|
Volumn 119, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 563-566
|
Comparison of the use of tympanic and extratympanic electrodes for electrocochleography
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
LIDOCAINE;
ACTION POTENTIAL;
ADULT;
AMPLITUDE MODULATION;
ARTICLE;
AUDIOMETRY;
AUDITORY THRESHOLD;
CLINICAL ARTICLE;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY;
ELECTROCOCHLEOGRAPHY;
ELECTRODE;
FEMALE;
FOREHEAD;
HUMAN;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
MALE;
MASTOID;
PATIENT SATISFACTION;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
PROSPECTIVE STUDY;
REPRODUCIBILITY;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
EARDRUM;
EQUIPMENT DESIGN;
EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE;
EVOKED RESPONSE AUDIOMETRY;
INSTRUMENTATION;
MICROELECTRODE;
MIDDLE AGED;
PHYSIOLOGY;
REFERENCE VALUE;
STANDARD;
UTILIZATION REVIEW;
ADULT;
AUDIOMETRY, EVOKED RESPONSE;
AUDITORY THRESHOLD;
CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES;
EQUIPMENT DESIGN;
EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
MALE;
MICROELECTRODES;
MIDDLE AGED;
PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
REFERENCE VALUES;
TYMPANIC MEMBRANE;
YOUNG ADULT;
|
EID: 64849103095
PISSN: 0023852X
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1002/lary.20105 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (8)
|
References (11)
|