A comparison of extratympanic versus transtympanic recordings in electrocochleography

International Journal of Audiology

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 135-140

  Noguchi, Yoshihiro ^a   Nishida, Hiroaki ^a   Komatsuzaki, Atsushi ^a  

^a TOKYO MEDICAL AND DENTAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Action potential; Cochlear microphonic; Detection threshold; Electrocochleography; Extratympanic; Transtympanic

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; ADULT; AGED; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COCHLEA POTENTIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROCOCHLEOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FREQUENCY MODULATION; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

ADULT; AGED; AUDIOMETRY, EVOKED RESPONSE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEA; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; TYMPANIC MEMBRANE;

EID: 0033032766     PISSN: 14992027     EISSN: 17088186     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/00206099909073015     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Ferraro J A, Krishnan G. Cochlear potentials in clinical audiology. Audiol Neurootol 1997; 2: 241–56
2. Eggermont J J, Odenthal D W. Methods in electrocochleography. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1974; 316: 17–24, Suppl
3. Ruth R A, Lambert P R, Ferraro J A. Electrocochleography: methods and clinical applications. Am J Otol 1988; 9: 1–11, Suppl
4. Nishida H, Okada M, Tanaka Y. Delayed responses in electrocochleography. ECoG, OAE and Intraoperative Monitoring, D, Höhmann. Kugler, Amsterdam and New York 1993; 41–4
5. Nishida H, Kumagami H. Electrocochleographic study of sudden deafness. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1978; 87: 571–8
6. Kumagami H, Nishida H, Baba M. Electrocochleographic study of Meniere's disease. Arch Otolaryngol 1982; 108: 284–8
7. Nishida H, Tanaka Y, Okada M, Inoue Y. Evoked otoacoustic emissions and electrocochleography in a patient with multiple sclerosis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1995; 104: 456–62
8. Noguchi Y, Komatsuzaki A, Nishida H. Cochlear microphonic potentials in patients with vestibular schwannomas. Otorhinolaryngology 1998; 60: 287–90
9. Crowley D E, Davis H, Beagley H A. Survey of the clinical use of electrocochleography. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1975; 84: 297–307
10. Ferraro J A, Murphy G B, Ruth R A. A comparative study of primary electrodes used in extra-tympanic electrocochleography. Semin Hear 1986; 7: 279–87
11. Stypulkowski P H, Staller S J. Clinical evaluation of a new ECoG recording electrode. Ear Hear 1987; 8: 304–10
12. Ferraro J A, Arenberg I K, Hassanein R S. Electrocochleography and symptoms of inner ear dysfunction. Arch Otolaryngol 1985; 111: 71–4
13. Huang T S, Hsu J C, Lee F P. Electrocochleograpic monitoring in endolymphatic sac surgery for Meniere's disease. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1994; 120: 552–9
14. Yoshie N, Yamaura K. Cochlear microphonic responses to pure tones in man recorded by a non-surgical method. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1969; 252: 37–69, Suppl
15. Elberling C, Salomon G. Cochlear microphonics recorded from the ear canal in man. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1973; 75: 489–95
16. Nishida H, Komatsuzaki A, Noguchi Y. A new electrode (HN-5) for CM measurement in extratympanic electrocochleography. Audiology 1998; 37: 7–16
17. Nishida H, Komatsuzaki A, Noguchi Y. Cochlear microphonics recordable at the non-shielded bedside using a new tubal transducer. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1997; 254: 46–9, (Suppl l)
18. Nishida H. Artifacts in electrocochleography. Otorhinolaryngology Tokyo 1983; 26: 753–7
19. Some Aspects of Electrocochleography (ECoG), C, Elbering. Fadl, Copenhagen 1977
20. Ponton C W, Don M, Eggermont J J. Place-specific derived cochlear microphonics from human ears. Scand Audiol 1992; 21: 131–41
21. Noguchi Y, Nishida H, Yokoyama K, Komatsuzaki A. Evaluation of data in electrocochleography. Audiology Jpn 1996; 39: 78–83
22. Yoshie N, Ohashi T. Clinical use of cochlear nerve action potential responses in man for differential diagnosis of hearing losses. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1969; 252: 71–87, Suppl
23. Elberling C. Action potentials recorded from the promontory and the surface, compared with recordings from the ear canal in man. Scand Audiol 1976; 5: 69–78
24. Humphries K N, Ashcroft P B, Douek E E. Extra-tympanic electrocochleography. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1977; 83: 303–9
25. Mori N, Saeki K, Matsunaga T, Asai H. Comparison between AP and SP parameters in trans-and extratympanic electrocochleography. Audiology 1982; 21: 228–41
26. Ruth R A, Lambert P R. Comparison of tympanic membrane to promontory electrode recordings of electrocochleographic responses in patients with Meniere's disease. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989; 100: 546–52
27. Schwaber M K, Hall J W. A simplified technique for transtympanic electrocochleography. Am J Otol 1990; 11: 260–5
28. Winzenburg S M, Margolis R H, Levine S C, Haines S J, Fournier E M. Tympanic and transtympanic electrocochleography in acoustic neuroma and vestibular nerve section surgery. Am J Otol 1993; 14: 63–9
29. Margolis R H, Rieks D, Fournier E M, Levine S E. Tympanic electrocochleography for diagnosis of Meniere's disease. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995; 121: 44–55
30. Wuyts F L, Van D, Heyning P H, Van Spaendonck M P, Molenberghs G. A review of electrocochleography: instrumentation settings and meta-analysis of criteria for diagnosis of endolymphatic hydrops. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1997; 526: 14–20, Suppl
31. Okada M, Nishida H, Tanaka Y. Evoked otoacoustic emissions and delayed microphonic potentials in the human ear. ECoG, OAE and Intraoperative Monitoring, D, Hohmann. Kugler, Amsterdam and New York 1993; 197–200