Ecological and Socioeconomic Correlates of Plant Invasions in Denmark: The Utility of Environmental Assessment Data

Ambio

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 89-94

  Thiele, Jan ^a   Kollmann, Johannes ^a   Andersen, Ulla Rose ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b NONE   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL INVASION; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; INTRODUCED SPECIES; INVASIVE SPECIES; SOCIOECONOMIC INDICATOR; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; SPECIES DIVERSITY;

ARTICLE; BIODIVERSITY; DENMARK; ECOSYSTEM; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; PLANT; SOCIOECONOMICS;

BIODIVERSITY; DENMARK; ECOSYSTEM; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; PLANTS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;

DENMARK; EURASIA; EUROPE; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA;

EID: 64849098848     PISSN: 00447447     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1579/0044-7447-38.2.89     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Davis, M.A., Grime, J.P. and Thompson, K. 2000. Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. J. Ecol. 88, 528-534.
2. Shea. K. and Chesson, P. 2002. Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17, 170-176.
3. Davis, M.A. 2005. Invasibility: the local mechanism driving community assembly and species diversity. Ecography 28, 696-704.
4. Foxcroft, L.C., Rouget, M. and Richardson, D.M. 2007. Risk assessment of riparian plant invasions into protected areas. Conserv. Biol. 21, 412-421.
5. Gelbard, J.L. and Belnap, J. 2003. Roads as conduits for exotic plant invasions in a semiarid landscape. Conserv. Biol. 17, 420-432.
6. Pauchard. A. and Alaback, P.B. 2004. Influence of elevation, land use. and landscape context on patterns of alien plant invasions along roadsides in protected areas of southcentral Chile. Conserv. Biol. 18, 238-248.
7. Hansen, M.J. and Clevenger. A.P. 2005. The influence of disturbance and habitat on the presence of non-native plant species along transport corridors. Biol. Conserv. 125, 249 259.
8. Hobbs, R.J. and Humphries, S.E. 1995. An integrated approach to the ecology and management of plant invasions. Conserv. Biol. 9, 761 770.
9. Arroyo, M.T.K, Marticorena, C, Matthei, O. and Cavieres, L. 2000. Plant invasions in Chile: present patterns and future predictions. In: Invasive Species in a Changing World: 2000. Mooney, H.A. and Hobbs, R.J. (eds). Island Press. Washington. DC, pp. 385-421.
10. Vila, M. and Pujadas, J. 2001. Land-use and socio-economic correlates of plant invasions in European and North African countries. Biol. Conserv. 100, 397-401.
11. Richardson, D.M., Rouget. M., Ralston. S.J., Cowling. R.M.. van Rensburg, B.J. and Thuiller. W. (2005). Species richness of alien plants in South Africa: environmental correlates and the relationship with indigenous plant species richness. Ecoscience 12, 391-402.
12. Kühn. I., Brandl, R., May, R. and Klotz, S. 2003. Plant distribution patterns in Germany-Will aliens match natives? Feddes Repert. 114. 559-573.
13. Collingham, Y.C., Wadsworth, R.A., Huntley, B. and Hulme, P.E. 2000. Predicting the spatial distribution of non-indigenous riparian weeds: issues of spatial scale and extent. J. Appl. Ecol. 37, (Suppl.), 13-27.
14. Nielsen, C, Hartvig, P. and Kollmann, J. 2008. Predicting the distribution of the invasive alien Heracleum maniegazzianum at two different spatial scales. Divers. Distrib. 14, 307-317.
15. For example, see http://www.nobanis.org
16. Tutin. T.G., Heywood, V.H., Burges. N.A., Moore. D.M.. Valentine. D.H.. Walters, S.M. and Webb, D.A. (eds). 1964-1980. Flora Europaea. Vol. 1 5. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
17. R Development Core Team 2006. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. (http://www. R-project.org)
18. Burnham, K.P. and Anderson, D.R. 1998. Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information-theoretic Approach. Springer, New York. 353 pp.
19. Legendre, P. and Legendre. L. 1998. Numerical Ecology (2nd ed). Elsevier Science. Amsterdam, 853 pp.
20. Sarkar. D. 2006. Lattice: Lattice Graphics. R package version 0.14-16.
21. Dansk Botanisk Forening. (http://www.botaniskforening.dk/1154-0.html)
22. Bruun, H.H. 2005. Biological flora of the British Isles. Rosa ruqosa Thunb. ex Murray../. Ecol. 93. 441-470.
23. NeoFlora. (http://www.floraweb.de/neoflora)
24. Alien Species in Poland, (http://www.iop.krakow.pl/ias)
25. Northern European and Baltic Network on Invasive Species, (http://www.nobanis.org)
26. Richardson. D.M. and Rejmánek. M. 2004. Conifers as invasive aliens: a global survey and predictive framework. Divers. Distrib. 10, 321-331.
27. Chytrý. M.. Pyšek, P., Tichý, L.. Knollova, I. and Danihelka. J. 2005. Invasions by alien plants in the Czech Republic: a quantitative assessment across habitats. Preslia 77, 339 354.
28. Maskell, L.C., Firbank, L.G., Thompson, K., Bullock, J.M. and Smart. S.M. 2006. Interactions between non-native plant species and the floristic composition of common habitats. J. Ecol. 94, 1052-1060.
29. Sorensen, M.M. and Tybirk, K. 2000. Vegetation analysis along a successional gradient from heath to oak forest. Nord. J. Bot. 20, 537-546.
30. Bastl, M.. Kocár, P.. Prach, K. and Pyšek, P. 1997. The effect of successional age and disturbance on the establishment of alien plants in man-made sites: An experimental approach. In: Plant Invasions: Studies from North America and Europe: 1997. Brock. J.H.. Wade, M., Pyšek, P. and Green. D. (eds). Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp. 191 201.
31. Thiele, J. and Otte, A. 2006. Analysis of habitats and communities invaded by Heracleum mantegazzianum Somm. et Lev. (Giant Hogweed) in Germany. Phvtococnologia 36, 281-320.
32. Pysek, P. and Prach, K. 1994. How important are rivers for supporting plant invasions? In: Ecology and Management of Invasive Riverside Plants. De Waal, L.C., Child, L., Wade, M.'and Brock, J.H. (eds). Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp. 16-26.
33. Planty-Tabacchi, A.-M., Tabacchi, E., Naiman, R.J., DeFerrari, C. and Décamps, H. 1996. Invasibility of species-rich communities in riparian zones. Conserv. Biol. 10, 598-607.
34. Laubel, A., Kronvang, B., Hald. A.B. and Jensen, C. 2003. Hydromorphological and biological factors influencing sediment and phosphorus loss via bank erosion in small lowland rural streams in Denmark. Hydrol. Process. 17, 3443-3463.
35. Hansen, B. and Nielsen, K.E. 1998. Comparison of acidic deposition to semi-natural ecosystems in Denmark -coastal heath, inland heath and oak wood. Atmos Environ 32. 1075-1086.
36. Liu, X., Ju. X., Zhang, Y., He, C., Kopsch, J. and Fusuo, Z. 2006. Nitrogen deposition in agroecosystems in the Beijing area. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 113. 370-377.
37. Juknys, R., Zaltauskaite, J. and Stakenas, V. 2007. Ion fluxes with bulk and throughfall deposition along an urban-suburban-rural gradient. Water Air Soil Pollut. 178, 363-372.
38. Alston. K.P. and Richardson, D.M. 2006. The roles of habitat features, disturbance, and distance from putative source populations in structuring alien plant invasions at the urban/wildland interface on the Cape Peninsula, South Africa. Biol. Conserv. 132, 183-198.
39. Kollmann, J.. Frederiksen. L., Vestergaard, P. and Bruun. H.H. 2007. Limiting factors for seedling emergence and establishment of the invasive non-native Rosa rugosa in a coastal dune system. Biol. Invasions 9, 31-42.
40. Burke, M.J.W. and Grime, J.P. 1996. An experimental study of plant community invasibility. Ecology 77, 776-790.
41. Pysek, P. 1991. Hcracleum mantegazzianum in the Czech Republic: dynamics of spreading from the historical perspective. Folia Geobot. 26, 439-454.
42. Thiele, J., Schuckert, U. and Otte, A. 2008. Cultural landscapes of Germany are patchcorridor-matrix mosaics for an invasive megaforb. Landscape Ecol. 23, 453-465.
43. Bimova, K., Mandák, B. and Kašparova, I. 2004. How does Reynoutriu invasion fit the various theories of invasibility? J. Veg. Sci. 15, 495-504.
44. Ellenberg, H. 1988. Vegetation Ecology of Central Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 731 pp.
45. Elton, C.S. 1958. The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants. Methuen, London, 181pp.
46. Davtes. K.F.. Harrison, S., Safford. H.D. and Vicrs, J.H. 2007. Productivity alters the scale dependence of the diversity-invasibilily relationship. Ecology 88, 1940-1947.
47. Fridley. J.D., Stachowicz. J.J.. Naeem, S., Sax, D.F., Seabloom, E.W., Smith, M.D., Stohlgren, T.J., Tilman, D., et al. 2007. The invasion paradox: reconciling pattern and process in species invasions. Ecology 88, 3-17.
48. Perelman, S.B., Chaneton. E.J., Batista, W.B., Burkart, S.E. and León. R.J.C. 2007. Habitat stress, species pool size and biotic resistance influence exotic plant richness in the flooding pampa grasslands. J. Ecol. 95, 662-673.
49. Hiebert, R.D. 1997. Prioritizing invasive plants and planning for management. In: Assessment and Management of Plant Invasions: 1997. Luken, J.O. and Thieret, J.W. (eds). Springer, New York. pp. 195-212.
50. First submitted 22 November 2007. Accepted for publication 18 February 2008.