A general pipeline for quality and statistical assessment of protein interaction data using R and Bioconductor

Nature Protocols

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 535-546

  Chiang, Tony ^a,b   Scholtens, Denise ^c  

^a EUROPEAN BIOINFORMATICS INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^b Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center   (United States)

^c NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BIOCONDUCTOR; COMPLEX FORMATION; CONDUCTOR; DATA ANALYSIS SOFTWARE; EXPLORATORY RESEARCH; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN PURIFICATION; PROTEIN QUALITY; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TWO HYBRID SYSTEM;

DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEXES; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; RESEARCH DESIGN; SOFTWARE;

EID: 64749102604     PISSN: 17542189     EISSN: 17502799     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2009.26     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Uetz, P. et al. A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 403, 623-627 (2000).
2. Newman, J.R., Wolf, E. & Kim, P.S. A computationally directed screen identifying interacting coiled coils from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 13203-13208 (2000).
3. Ito, T. et al. A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 4569-4574 (2001).
4. Tong, A.H.-Y. et al. A combined experimental and computational strategy to define protein interaction networks for peptide recognition modules. Science 295, 321-324 (2002).
5. Risseeuw, E.P. et al. Protein interaction analysis of SCF ubiquitin E3 ligase subunits from Arabidopsis. Plant J. 34, 753-767 (2003).
6. Hazbun, T. et al. Assigning function to yeast proteins by integration of technologies. Mol. Cell 6, 1353-1365 (2003).
7. Millson, S.H. et al. A two-hybrid screen of the yeast proteome for Hsp90 interactors uncovers a novel Hsp90 chaperone requirement in the activity of a stress-activated mitogen-activated protein kinase Slt2p (Mpk1p). Eukaryot. Cell 4, 849-860 (2005).
8. Ho, Y. et al. Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry. Nature 415 180-183 (2002).
9. Gavin, A.-C. et al. Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature 415, 141-147 (2002).
10. Gavin, A.-C. et al. Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery. Nature 440, 631-636 (2006).
11. Krogan, N.J. et al. Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 440, 637-643 (2006).
12. Ohi, M.D. et al. Proteomics analysis reveals stable multiprotein complexes in both fission and budding yeasts containing Myb-related Cdc5p/Cef1p, novel pre-mRNA splicing factors, and snRNAs. Mol. Cell. Biol. 7, 2011-2024 (2002).
13. Grandi, P. et al. 90S pre-ribosomes include the 35S pre-rRNA, the U3 snoRNP, and 40S subunit processing factors but predominantly lack 60S synthesis factors. Mol. Cell 10, 105-115 (2002).
14. Zhao, R. et al. Navigating the chaperone network: An integrative map of physical and genetic interactions mediated by the Hsp90 chaperone. Cell 120, 715-727 (2005).
15. Graumann, J. et al. Applicability of tandem affinity purification mudpit to pathway proteomics in yeast. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 3 226-237 (2004).
16. Chiang, T., Scholtens, D., Sarkar, D., Gentleman, R. & Huber, W. Coverage and error models of protein-protein interaction data by directed graph analysis. Genome Biol. 8, R186 (2007).
17. Scholtens, D., Chiang, T., Huber, W. & Gentleman, R. Estimating node degree in bait-prey graphs. Bioinformatics 24, 218-224 (2008).
18. Zhang, B., Park, B.H., Karpinets, T. & Samatova, N.F. From pull-down data to protein interaction networks and complexes with biological relevance. Bioinformatics 24, 979-986 (2008).
19. Scholtens, D., Vidal, M. & Gentleman, R. Local dynamic modeling of global interactome networks. Bioinformatics 21, 3548-3557 (2005).
20. R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria (2008).
21. Gentleman, R. et al. Bioconductor: Open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biol. 5, R80 (2004).
22. Shannon, P. et al. Cytoscape: A software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 13, 2498-2504 (2003).
23. Cline, M. et al. Integration of biological networks and gene expression data using Cytoscape. Nat. Protoc. 2, 2366-2382 (2007).
24. Milenkovic, T., Lai, J. & Przulj, N. GraphCrunch: A tool for large network analyses. BMC Bioinformatics 9, 70 (2008).
25. Royer, L., Reimann, M., Andreopoulous, B. & Schroeder, M. Unraveling protein networks with power graph analysis. PLoS Comput. Biol. 4, e1000108 (2008).
26. Tuttle, W.T. Graph Theory. Cambridge Mathematical Library, New York, (2001).
27. Stanley, R.P. Enumerative Combinatorics I. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, (1997).
28. Carey, V.J., Gentry, J., Whalen, E. & Gentleman, R. Network structures and algorithms in bioconductor. Bioinformatics 21, 135-136 (2005).
29. Huber, W., Carey, V.J., Long, L., Falcon, S. & Gentleman, R. Graphs in molecular biology. BMC Bioinformatics 8 (Suppl. 6): S8 (2007).
30. Chiang, T., et al. Rintact: Enabling computational analysis of molecular interaction data from the IntAct repository. Bioinformatics 24, 1100-1101 (2008).
31. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Gene ontology: Tool for the unification of biology. Nat. Genet. 25, 25-29 (2000).
32. Kanehisa, M. & Goto, S. KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 27-30 (2000).
33. Kerrien, S. et al. Broadening the horizon - level 2.5 of the HUPO-PSI format for molecular interactions. BMC Biol. 5, 44 (2007).
34. Stark, C. et al. BioGRID: A general repository for interaction datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, D535-D539 (2006).
35. Salwinski, L. et al. The database of interacting proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, D449-D451 (2004).
36. Mishra, G. et al. Human protein reference database - 2006 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, D411-D414 (2006).
37. Kerrien, S. et al. IntAct - open source resource for molecular interaction data. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, D561-D565 (2007).
38. Chatr-aryamontri, A. et al. MINT: The Molecular INTeraction database. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, D572-D574 (2007).
39. Orchard, S. et al. The minimum information required for reporting a molecular interaction experiment (MIMIx). Nat. Biotechnol. 25 894-898 (2007).
40. Falcon, S. & Gentleman, R. Using GOstats to test gene lists for GO term association. Bioinformatics 2, 257-258 (2006).
41. Stevens, S. & Abelson, J. Purification of the yeast U4/U6.U5 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle and identification of its proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 7226-7231 (1999).
42. Chowdhury, A., Mukhopadhyay, J. & Tharun, S. The decapping activator Lsm1p-7p-Pat1p complex has the intrinsic ability to distinguish between oligoadenylated and polyadenylated RNAs. RNA 13, 998-1016 (2007).