Imaging of small hepatic metastases of colorectal carcinoma: How to use superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the multidetector-row computed tomography age?

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 266-272

  Motosugi, Utaroh ^a   Ichikawa, Tomoaki ^a   Nakajima, Hiroto ^a   Sou, Hironobu ^a   Sano, Mika ^a   Sano, Katsuhiro ^a   Araki, Tsutomu ^a   Iino, Hiroshi ^a   Fujii, Hideki ^a   Nakazawa, Tadao ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YAMANASHI   (Japan)

Author keywords

Colorectal carcinoma; Liver; MDCT; Metastasis; SPIO

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSIS; IRON OXIDES; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PATHOLOGY; RESONANCE; SUPERPARAMAGNETISM;

COLORECTAL CARCINOMA; DYNAMIC CONTRAST-ENHANCED; FREE-RESPONSE RECEIVERS; IMAGING CONTRAST; MDCT; METASTASIS; MULTIDETECTOR ROW COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; POSITIVE PREDICTIVE VALUES; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS ANALYSIS; SUPERPARAMAGNETIC IRON OXIDES;

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

FERUCARBOTRAN; IOHEXOL; SUPERPARAMAGNETIC IRON OXIDE; CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; IRON; OXIDE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COLORECTAL CANCER; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LIVER METASTASIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; COLORECTAL TUMOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; LIVER TUMOR; METASTASIS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

AGED; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IOHEXOL; IRON; LIVER NEOPLASMS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; OXIDES; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 64749086675     PISSN: 03638715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e31817f5c82     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Seneterre E, Taourel P, Bouvier Y, et al. Detection of hepatic metastases: ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging versus unenhanced MR imaging and CT during arterial portography. Radiology. 1996;200: 785-792.
2. Frate CD, Bazzocchi M, Zulani C, et al. Detection of liver metastases: comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced and ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging examinations. Radiology. 2002;225:766-772.
3. Frate CD, Zuiani C, Londero V, et al. Comparing levovist-enhanced pulse inversion harmonic imaging and ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging of hepatic metastases. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180: 1339-1346.
4. Fretz CJ, Stark DD, Metz CE, et al. Detection of hepatic metastases: comparison of contrast-enhanced CT, unenhanced MR imaging, and iron oxide-enhanced MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990;155: 763-770.
5. Hagspiel KD, Neidl KF, Eichenberger AC, et al. Detection of liver metastases: comparison of superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced and unenhanced MR imaging at 1.5 T with dynamic CT, intraoperative US, and percutaneous US. Radiology. 1995;196:471-478.
6. Ward J, Naik KS, Guthrie JA, et al. Hepatic lesion detection: comparison of MR imaging after the administration of superparamagnetic iron oxide with dual-phase CT by using alternative-free response receiver operating characteristic analysis. Radiology. 1999;210:459-466.
7. Muller RD, Vogel K, Neumann K, et al. SPIO-MR imaging versus double-phase spiral CT in detecting malignant lesions of the liver. Acta Radiol. 1999;40:628-635.
8. Bluemke DA, Paulson EK, Choti MA, et al. Detection of hepatic lesions in candidates for surgery: comparison of ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging and dual-phase helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175:1653-1658.
9. Reimer P, Jahnke N, Fiebich M, et al. Hepatic lesion detection and characterization: value of nonenhanced MR imaging, superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MR imaging, and spiral CT-ROC analysis. Radiology. 2000;217:152-158.
10. Hu H. Multi-slice helical CT: scan and reconstruction. Med Phys. 1999;26:5-18.
11. Weg N, Scheer MR, Gabor MP. Liver lesions: improved detection with dual-detector-array CT and routine 2.5-mm thin collimation. Radiology. 1998;209:417-426.
12. Ward J, Robinson PJ, Guthrie JA, et al. Liver metastases in candidates for hepatic resection: comparison of helical CT and gadolinium- and SPIO-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology. 2005;237:170-180.
13. Onishi H, Murakami T, Kim T, et al. Hepatic metastases: detection with multi-detector row CT, SPIO-enhanced MR imaging, and both techniques combined. Radiology. 2006;239:131-138.
14. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2000;284: 3043-3045.
15. Ichikawa T, Erturk SM, Araki T. Multiphasic contrast-enhanced multidetector-row CT of liver: contrast-enhancement theory and practical scan protocol with a combination of fixed injection duration and patients' body-weight - tailored dose of contrast material. Eur J Radiol. 2006;58:165-176.
16. Kumano S, Murakami T, Kim T, et al. Using superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MRI to differentiate metastatic hepatic tumors and nonsolid benign lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;81:1335-1339.
17. Chakraborty DP, Winter LH. Free-response methodology: alternate analysis and a new observer-performance experiment. Radiology. 1990;174:873-881.
18. Fleiss JL. The measurement of interrater agreement. In: Fleiss JL, ed. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Wiley; 1981:212-236.
19. Nomura K, Kadoya M, Ueda K, et al. Detection of hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma comparison of histopathologic features of anatomically resected liver with results of preoperative imaging. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2007;41:789-795.
20. Kim YK, Ko SW, Hwang SB, et al. Detection and characterization of liver metastases: 16-slice multidetector computed tomography versus superparamagnetic iron oxide - enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:1337-1345.
21. Soyer P, Poccard M, Boudiaf M, et al. Detection of hypovascular hepatic metastases at triple-phase helical CT: sensitivity of phases and comparison with surgical and histopathologic findings. Radiology. 2004;231:413-420.
22. Kim YK, Lee JM, Kim CS, et al. Detection of liver metastases: gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced three-dimensional dynamic phases and one-hour delayed phase MR imaging versus superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MR imaging. Eur Radiol. 2005;15:220-228.
23. Nasu K, Kuroki Y, Nawano S, et al. Hepatic metastases: diffusion-weighted sensitivity-encoding versus SPIO-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology. 2006;239:122-130.
24. Coenegrachts K, Delanote J, Ter Beek L, et al. Improved focal liver lesion detection: comparison of single-shot diffusion-weighted echoplanar and single-shot T2 weighted turbo spin echo techniques. Br J Radiol. 2007;80:524-531.