Forensic Phonetics

Linguistics and Language Compass

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 671-711

  Jessen, Michael ^a  

^a BKA Bundeskriminalamt   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 64649088703     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1749818X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00066.x     Document Type: Review

References (92)

1. Alexander, Anil, Damien Dessimoz, Filippo Botti, and Andrzej Drygajlo. 2005. Aural and automatic forensic speaker recognition in mismatched conditions. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 12.214-34.
2. Allen, J. Sean, Joanne L. Miller, and David DeSteno. 2003. Individual talker differences in voice-onset-time. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 113.544-52.
3. Baldwin, John, and Peter French. 1990. Forensic phonetics. London, UK: Pinter.
4. Bijhold, Jurrien, Arnout Ruifrok, Michael Jessen, Zeno Geradts, Sabine Ehrhardt, and Ivo Alberink. 2007. Forensic audio and visual evidence 2004-2007: A review. 15th INTERPOL Forensic Science Symposium, October 2007, Lyon, France, http://www.forensic.to/webhome/enfsidiwg/ Interpol-review-2007-audio-visual-evidence-paper.pdf
5. Bilton, Michael. 2003. Wicked beyond belief. The hunt for the Yorkshire ripper. London, UK: Harper Collins.
6. Bimbot, Frédéric, Jean-François Bonastre, Corinne Fredouille, Guillaume Gravier, Ivan Magrin-Chagnolleau, Sylvain Meignier, Teva Merlin, Javier Ortega-García, Dijana Petrovska-Delacrétaz, and Douglas A. Reynolds. 2004. A tutorial on text-independent speaker verification. EURASIP Journal on Applied Signal Processing 4.430-51.
7. Blatchford, Helen, and Paul Foulkes. 2006. Identification of voices in shouting. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 13.241-54.
8. Botti, Filippo, Anil Alexander, and Andrzej Drygajlo. 2004. On compensation of mismatched recording conditions in the Bayesian approach for forensic automatic speaker recognition. Forensic Science International 146S.101-6.
9. Braun, Angelika. 1996. Age estimation by different listener groups. Forensic Linguistics 3.65-73.
10. Braun, Angelika. 1995. Fundamental frequency - How speaker-specific is it? Studies in forensic phonetics, ed. by Angelika Braun and Jens-Peter Köster, 9-23. Trier, Germany: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.
11. Broeders, A.P.A. 2001. Forensic speech and audio analysis, forensic linguistics 1998 to 2001: A review. 13th INTERPOL Forensic Science Symposium, 16-19 October 2001, Lyon, France, http://www.interpol.int/ Public/Forensic/IFSS/meeting13/Reviews/ForensicLinguistics.pdf
12. Broeders, A.P.A. 2004. Forensic speech and audio analysis, forensic linguistics. A review: 2001 to 2004. 14th INTERPOL Forensic Science Symposium, 19-22 October 2004, Lyon, France, 171-88, http://www.interpol.int/Public/Forensic/IFSS/meeting14/ReviewPapers.pdf
13. Broeders, A.P.A. 2006. Phonetics, Forensic. Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (2nd edn), ed. by Keith Brown, 460-3. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
14. Broeders, A.P.A., and A.G. van Amelsvoort. 1999. Lineup construction for forensic earwitness identification: A practical approach. Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, San Francisco, CA, vol. 2, 1373-6.
15. Byrne, Catherine, and Paul Foulkes. 2004. The 'mobile phone effect' on vowel formants. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 11.83-102.
16. Clark, Herbert H., and Jean E. Fox Tree. 2002. Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition 84.73-111.
17. Clopper, Cynthia G., and David B. Pisoni. 2005. Perception of dialect variation. The Handbook of speech perception, ed. by David B. Pisoni and Robert E. Remez, 313-337. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
18. Darby, John K. (ed.). 1981. Speech evaluation in psychiatry. New York, NY: Grune and Statton. Douglas, John, and Mark Olshaker. 1995. Mind hunter. Inside the FBI's elite serial crime unit. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
19. Drygajlo, Andrzej. 2007. Forensic automatic speaker recognition. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine. March.132-5.
20. Ellis, Stanley. 1994. The Yorkshire ripper enquiry: Part I. Forensic Linguistics 1.197-206.
21. Eriksson, Anders, and Francisco Lacerda. 2007. Charlatanry in forensic speech science: A problem to be taken seriously. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 14.169-93.
22. Fisher, Jim. 1999. The ghosts of Hopewell: Setting the record straight in the Lindbergh case. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
23. Fisher, Jim. 2000. The Lindbergh case. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press (paperback revision of the first 1987 edition).
24. Fitch, W. Tecumseh, and Jay Giedd. 1999. Morphology and development of the human vocal tract: A study using magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 106.1511-22.
25. Foulkes, Paul, and Anthony Barron. 2000. Telephone speaker recognition amongst members of a close social network. Forensic Linguistics 7.180-98.
26. Foulkes, Paul, and Gerard Docherty. 2006. The social life of phonetics and phonology. Journal of Phonetics 34.409-38.
27. French, Peter. 1990. Analytic procedures for the determination of disputed utterances. Texte zur Theorie und Praxis forensischer Linguistik, ed. by Hannes Kniffka, 201-13. Tübingen, Germany: Niemeyer.
28. French, Peter. 1994. An overview of forensic phonetics with particular reference to speaker identification. Forensic Linguistics 1.169-81.
29. French, Peter, and Philip Harrison. 2006. Investigative and evidential applications of forensic speech science. Witness testimony, psychological, investigative and evidential perspectives, ed. by Anthony Heaton-Armstrong, Eric Shepherd, Gisli Gudjonsson, and Davis Wolchover, 247-62. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
30. French, Peter, and Philip Harrison. (eds.). 2007. Position statement concerning use of impressionistic likelihood terms in forensic speaker comparison cases. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 14.137-44.
31. French, Peter, Philip Harrison, and Jack Windsor Lewis. 2006. R vs John Samuel Humble: The Yorkshire Ripper hoaxer trial. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 13.255-73.
32. Gfroerer, Stefan. 2003. Auditory-instrumental forensic speaker recognition. Proceedings of EUROSPEECH 2003, Geneva, Switzerland, 705-8.
33. Goldman Eisler, F. 1968. Psycholinguistics: Experiments in spontaneous speech. London, UK: Academic Press.
34. Gonzalez-Rodriguez, Joaquin, Andrzej Drygajlo, Daniel Ramos-Castro, Marta Garcia-Gomar, and Javier Ortega-Garcia. 2006. Robust estimation, interpretation and assessment of likelihood ratios in forensic speaker recognition. Computer Speech and Language 20.331-55.
35. Hammersley, Richard, and J. Don Read. 1996. Voice identification by humans and computers. Psychological issues in eyewitness identification, ed. by Siegfried Ludwig Sporer, Roy S. Malpass, and Guenter Koehnken, 117-52. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
36. Hirano, M. 1981. Clinical examination of voice. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
37. Hollien, Harry. 1990. The Acoustics of crime. The new science of forensic phonetics. New York, NY: Plenum.
38. Hollien, Harry. 2002. Forensic voice identification. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
39. Hudson, Toby, Gea de Jong, Kirsty McDougall, Philip Harrison, and Francis Nolan. 2007. F0 statistics for 100 young male speakers of Standard Southern British English. Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Saarbrücken, Germany, 6-10 August 2007, 1809-1812. http://www.icphs2007.de/conference/Papers/1570/1570.pdf
40. International Phonetic Association. 1999. Handbook of the International Phonetic Association. A guide to the use of the International Phonetic Alphabet. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
41. Jessen, Michael. 2007a. Forensic reference data on articulation rate in German. Science and Justice 47.50-67.
42. Jessen, Michael. 2007b. Speaker classification in forensic phonetics and acoustics. Speaker classification I: Fundamentals, features, and methods, ed. by Christian Müller, 180-204. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
43. Jessen, Michael, Olaf Köster, and Stefan Gfroerer. 2005. Influence of vocal effort on average and variability of fundamental frequency. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 12.174-213.
44. Johnson, Keith. 1997. Speech perception without speaker normalization: an exemplar model. Talker variability in speech processing, ed. by Keith Johnson and John W. Mullennix, 145-165. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
45. Kaplan, Ellen, and Michael Kaplan. 2006. Chances are...: Adventures in probability. New York, NY: Viking Books.
46. Keating, Patricia A. 1990. Phonetic representations in a generative grammar. Journal of Phonetics 18.321-34.
47. Köster, Olaf, and Jens-Peter Köster. 2004. The auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice quality in forensic speaker recognition. The Phonetician 89.9-37.
48. Köster, Olaf, Michael Jessen, Freshta Khairi, and Hartwig Eckert. 2007. Auditory-perceptual identification of voice quality by expert and non-expert listeners. Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Saarbrücken, Gertmany, 6-10 August 2007, 1845-1848, http://www.icphs2007.de/conference/Papers/1152/1152.pdf
49. Kreiman, Jody, Bruce. R. Gerrat, Kristin Precoda, and Gerald S. Berke. 1992. Individual differences in voice quality perception. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 35.512-20.
50. Künzel, Hermann J. 1987. Sprechererkennung: Grundzüge forensischer Sprachverarbeitung. Heidelberg, Germany: Kriminalistik Verlag.
51. Künzel, Hermann J. 1995. Field procedures in forensic speaker recognition. Studies in General and English Phonetics. Essays in Honour of Professor J. D. O'Connor, ed. by Jack Windsor Lewis, 68-84. London, UK: Routledge.
52. Künzel, Hermann J. 1997. Some general phonetic and forensic aspects of speaking tempo. Forensic Linguistics 4.48-83.
53. Künzel, Hermann J. 2000. Effects of voice disguise on speaking fundamental frequency. Forensic Linguistics 7.149-79.
54. Künzel, Hermann J. 2004. Tasks in forensic speech and audio analysis: A tutorial. The Phonetician 90.9-22.
55. Ladefoged, Peter. 1971. Preliminaries to linguistic phonetics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
56. Ladefoged, Peter, and Ian Maddieson. 1996. The sound of the world's languages. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
57. Laver, John. 1980. The phonetic description of voice quality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
58. Laver, John. 1994. Principles of phonetics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
59. McDougall, Kirsty. 2004. Speaker-specific formant dynamics: An experiment on Australian English /ai/. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 11.103-30.
60. McDougall, Kirsty. 2006. Dynamic features of speech and the characterization of speakers: Towards a new approach using formant frequencies. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 13.89-126.
61. McDougall, Kirsty, and Francis Nolan. 2007. Discrimination of speakers using the formant dynamics of /u:/ in British English. Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Saarbrücken, Germany, 6-10 August 2007, 1825-1828, http://www.icphs2007.de/ conference/Papers/1567/1567.pdf
62. McGehee, Frances. 1937. The reliability of the identification of the human voice. Journal of General Psychology 17.249-71.
63. Meuwly, D. 2000. Voice analysis. Encyclopedia of forensic sciences, ed. by Jay A. Siegel, Pekka J. Saukko, and Geoffrey C. Knupfer, 1413-21. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
64. Mokhtari, Parham, Tatsuya Kitamura, Hironori Takemoto, and Kiyoshi Honda. 2007. Principal components of vocal-tract area functions and inversion of vowels by linear regression of cepstrum coefficients. Journal of Phonetics 35.20-39.
65. Müller, Christian (ed.). 2007. Speaker classification vol. I and II. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
66. Nawka, Tadeus, and Lutz Christian Anders. 1996. Die auditive Bewertung heiserer Stimmen nach dem RBH-System. Stuttgart, Germany: Thieme (2 CDs).
67. Nolan, Francis. 1983. The phonetic bases of speaker recognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
68. Nolan, Francis. 1990. The limitations of auditory-phonetic speaker identification. Texte zur Theorie und Praxis forensischer Linguistik, ed. by Hannes Kniffka, 457-79. Tübingen, Germany: Niemeyer.
69. Nolan, Francis. 1994. Auditory and acoustic analysis in speaker recognition. Language and the law, ed. by John Gibbon, 326-45. London, UK: Longman.
70. Nolan, Francis. 1997. Speaker recognition and forensic phonetics. The handbook of phonetic sciences, ed. by William J. Hardcastle and John Laver, 744-67. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
71. Nolan, Francis. 2001. Speaker identification evidence: Its forms, limitations and roles. Proceedings of the conference 'Law and Language: Prospect and Retrospect', 12-15 December 2001, Levi (Finnish Lapland). http://www.ling.cam.ac.uk/francis/LawLang.doc
72. Nolan, Francis. 2003. A recent voice parade. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 10.277-91.
73. Nolan, Francis. 2005. Forensic speaker identification and the phonetic description of voice quality. A figure of speech. A festschrift for John Laver, ed. by W.J. Hardcastle and J. Mackenzie Beck, 385-411. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
74. Nolan, Francis, and Catalin Grigoras. 2005. A case for formant analysis in forensic speaker identification. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 12.143-73.
75. Nygaard, Lynne C. 2005. Perceptual integration of linguistic and nonlinguistic properties of speech. The handbook of speech perception, ed. by David B. Pisoni and Robert E. Remez, 390-413. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
76. Ormerod, David. 2001. Sounds familiar? - Voice identification evidence. Criminal Law Review 595-622.
77. Perfect, Timothy J., Laura J. Hunt, and Christopher M. Harris. 2002. Verbal overshadowing in voice recognition. Applied Cognitive Psychology 16.973-80.
78. Pfitzinger, Hartmut. 2002. Intrinsic phone durations are speaker-specific. Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing 2002, 2.1113-6, http://www.phonetik.uni-muenchen.de/ ~hpt/
79. Pisoni, David. 1997. Some thoughts on 'normalization' in speech perception. Talker variability in speech processing, ed. by Keith Johnson and John W. Mullennix, 9-32. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
80. Przybocki, Mark A., Alvin F. Martin, and Audrey N. Le. 2007. NIST speaker recognition evaluations utilizing the Mixer corpora - 2004, 2005, 2006. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing 15.1951-59.
81. Robertson, Bernard, and G.A. Vignaux. 1995. Interpreting evidence. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
82. Rose, Phil. 2005. Forensic speaker recognition at the beginning of the twenty-first century - An overview and a demonstration. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences 37.49-72.
83. Rose, Phil. 2006a. Technical forensic speaker recognition: Evaluation, types and testing of evidence. Computer Speech and Language 20.159-91.
84. Rose, Phil. 2006b. Accounting for correlation in linguistic-acoustic likelihood ratio-based forensic speaker discrimination. Proceedings of the Speaker and Language Recognition Workshop, 2006, Puerto Rico: IEEE Odyssey.
85. Rose, Phil, and Sally Duncan. 1995. Naïve auditory identification and discrimination of similar voices by familiar listeners. Forensic Linguistics 2.1-17.
86. Rose, Phil, Takashi Osanai, and Yuko Kinoshita. 2003. Strength of forensic speaker identification evidence: Multispeaker formant- and cepstrum-based segmental discrimination with a Bayesian likelihood ratio as threshold. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 10.179-202.
87. Rose, Philip. 2002. Forensic speaker identification. London, UK: Taylor and Francis.
88. Schiller, Niels O., and Olaf Köster. 1998. The ability of expert witnesses to identify voices: A comparison between trained and untrained listeners. Forensic Linguistics 5.1-9.
89. Shriberg, Elizabeth. 2007. Higher-level features in speaker recognition. Speaker classification I: Fundamentals, features, and methods, ed. by Christian Müller, 241-59. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
90. Shuy, Roger W. 2007. Language in the American courtroom. Language and Linguistics Compass 1.100-14.
91. Sporer, Siegfried Ludwig, Roy S. Malpass, and Guenter Koehnken (eds.). 1996. Psychological issues in eyewitness identification. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
92. Stevens, Kenneth N. 1998. Acoustic phonetics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.