Forensic speaker identification and the phonetic description of voice quality

A Figure of Speech: A Festschrift for John Laver

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 385-411

  Nolan, Francis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 30344482628     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410611888     Document Type: Chapter

References (24)

1. Baldwin, J. (1979). Phonetics and speaker identification. Medicine, Science and the Law, 19,231-232.
2. Baldwin, J., & French, J. P. (1990). Forensic phonetics. London: Pinter.
3. Beck, J. M. (1988). Organic variation and voice quality. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Edinburgh, Scotland.
4. Beck, J. M. (1997). Organic variation of the vocal apparatus. In W J. Hardcastle & J. Laver (Eds.), A handbook of phonetic sciences (pp. 256-297). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
5. Esling, J. H. (1978). Voice quality in Edinburgh: A sociolinguistic and phonetic study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Edinburgh, Scotland.
6. Hollien, H. (1990). The acoustics of crime: The new science of forensic phonetics. Plenum: New York.
7. Honikman, B. (1964). Articulatory settings. In D. Abercrombie, D. B. Fry, P A. D. MacCarthy N. C. Scott, & J. L. M. Trim (Eds.), In honour of Daniel Jones. London: Longman.
8. International Phonetic Association. (1999). Handbook of the International Phonetic Association. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
9. Künzel, H. J. (1987). Sprechererkennung: Grundzüge forensischer Sprachverarbeitung [Principles of forensic speech processing]. Heidelberg, Germany: Kriminalistik Verlag.
10. Künzel, H. J. (2001). Beware the ‘telephone effect’: the influence of telephone transmission on the measurement of formant frequencies. Forensic Linguistics, 8, 80-99.
11. Laver, J. (1976). The semiotic nature of phonetic data. York Papers in Linguistics, 6,55-62.
12. Laver, J. (1980). The phonetic description of voice quality. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
13. McDougall, K. (2002, December). Speaker-characterising properties of formant dynamics: A case study. Proceedings of the 9th Australian International Conference on Speech and Science Technology, Melbourne, 403-408.
14. Ní Chasaide, A., & Gobl, C. (1997). Voice source variation. In W J. Hardcastle & J. Laver (Eds.), A handbook of phonetic sciences (pp. 427-461). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
15. Nolan, F. (1982). Review of The Phonetic Description of Voice Quality by J. Laver. Journal of Linguistics, 18, 442-454.
16. Nolan, F. (1983). The phonetic bases of speaker recognition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
17. Nolan, F. (1991). Forensic phonetics.Journal of Linguistics, 27, 483-493.
18. Nolan, F. (1994). Auditory and acoustic analysis in speaker recognition. In J. Gibbons (Ed.), Language and the law (pp. 326-345). London: Longman.
19. Nolan, F. (1997). Speaker recognition and forensic phonetics. In W J. Hardcastle & J. Laver (Eds.), A handbook of phonetic sciences (pp. 744-767). Oxford: Blackwell.
20. Nolan, F. & Grabe, E. (1996). Preparing a voice line-up. Forensic Linguistics, 3, 74-94.
21. Robertson, B., & Vignaux, G. A. (1995). Interpreting evidence. London: Wiley.
22. Rose, P (2002). Forensic speaker identification. London: Taylor & Francis.
23. Stevens, K. N. (1989). On the quantal nature of speech. Journal of Phonetics, 17, 3-45.
24. Tosi, O. (1979). Voice identification: Theory and legal applications. Baltimore: University Park Press.