Accuracy of a computer-assisted navigation system in resurfacing hip arthroplasty

International Orthopaedics

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 391-395

  Pitto, R P ^a   Malak, S ^b   Anderson, I A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMUR; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; INFRARED RADIATION; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; VALGUS DEFORMITY; VARUS DEFORMITY;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE MALALIGNMENT; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMUR; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MODELS, ANATOMIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 64249122178     PISSN: 03412695     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-008-0644-6     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. ARW Barrett BL Davies MPSF Gomes 2007 Computer-assisted hip resurfacing surgery using the Acrobot navigation system J Eng Med 221 773 785
2. PE Beaule JL Lee MJ Le Duff 2004 Orientation of the femoral component in surface arthroplasty of the hip: a biomechanical and clinical analysis J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 86-A 2015 2021
3. JP Cobb V Kannan K Brust G Thevendan 2007 Navigation reduces the learning curve in resurfacing total hip arthroplasty Clin Orthop Rel Res 463 90 97
4. J Daniel PB Pynsent DJ McMinn 2004 Metal on metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis J Bone Joint Surgery [Br] 86 177 184
5. ET Davis P Gallie K Macgroarty 2007 The accuracy of image-free computer navigation in the placement of the femoral component of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing. A cadaveric study J Bone Joint Surgery [Br] 89 557 560
6. LD Dorr Y Hishiki Z Wan 2005 Development of imageless computer navigation for acetabular component position in total hip replacement Iowa Orthop J 25 1 9
7. T Hess T Gampe C Kottgen B Szawlowski 2004 Intraoperative navigation for hip resurfacing: methods and first results Orthopade 33 1183 1193
8. AJ Hodgson KB Inkpen M Shekhman 2005 Computer-assisted femoral head resurfacing Comput Aided Surg 10 337 343
9. A Hodgson N Helmy BA Masri 2007 Comparative repeatability of guide-pin axis positioning in computer-assisted and manual femoral head resurfacing arthroplasty Proc Inst Mech Eng 221 713 724
10. Krüger S, Zambelli PY, Leyvraz PF, Jolles BM (2007) Computer-assisted placement technique in hip resurfacing arthroplasty: improvement in accuracy? Int Orthop. Online First 24 Aug 2007
11. T Leenders D Vandevelde G Mahieu R Nuyts 2002 Reduction in variability of acetabular cup abduction using computer assisted surgery: a prospective and randomized study Comput Aided Surg 7 99 106
12. RP Pitto AJ Graydon L Bradley 2006 Accuracy of a computer assisted navigation system for total knee replacement J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 88 601 605
13. Pitto RP (2008) The trochanteric slide osteotomy approach for resurfacing hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop. Online First 21 May 2008
14. AJ Shimmin D Back 2005 Femoral neck fractures following Birmingham hip resurfacing. A. national review of 50 cases J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 87 463 464
15. JM Sikorski S Chauhan 2003 Computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery: do we need CAOS? J Bone Joint Surg 85 319 323
16. M Sparmann B Wolke H Czupalla 2003 Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 85 830 835