Prospective Electrocardiogram-Gated Delayed Enhanced Multidetector Computed Tomography Accurately Quantifies Infarct Size and Reduces Radiation Exposure

JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 412-420

  Chang, Hyuk Jae ^a   George, Richard T ^a   Schuleri, Karl H ^a   Evers, Kristine ^a   Kitagawa, Kakuya ^a   Lima, João A C ^a   Lardo, Albert C ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

computed tomography; myocardial infarction; perfusion; radiation; viability

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAM; GATED IMAGING; HEART INFARCTION; HEART INFARCTION SIZE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE QUALITY; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION EXPOSURE; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SWINE;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; CONTRAST MEDIA; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; MICROVESSELS; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; MYOCARDIUM; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SWINE; SWINE, MINIATURE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TRIIODOBENZOIC ACIDS;

EID: 64149110365     PISSN: 1936878X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2008.12.019     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Pagley P.R., Beller G.A., Watson D.D., Gimple L.W., and Ragosta M. Improved outcome after coronary bypass surgery in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and residual myocardial viability. Circulation 96 (1997) 793-800
2. Bax J.J., Schinkel A.F., Boersma E., et al. Early versus delayed revascularization in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and substantial viability: impact on outcome. Circulation 108 Suppl 1 (2003) II39-II42
3. Gerber B.L., Rochitte C.E., Melin J.A., et al. Microvascular obstruction and left ventricular remodeling early after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 101 (2000) 2734-2741
4. Wu K.C., and Lima J.A. Noninvasive imaging of myocardial viability: current techniques and future developments. Circ Res 93 (2003) 1146-1158
5. Fieno D.S., Kim R.J., Chen E.L., Lomasney J.W., Klocke F.J., and Judd R.M. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of myocardium at risk: distinction between reversible and irreversible injury throughout infarct healing. J Am Coll Cardiol 36 (2000) 1985-1991
6. Gray W.R., Buja L.M., Hagler H.K., Parkey R.W., and Willerson J.T. Computed tomography for localization and sizing of experimental acute myocardial infarcts. Circulation 58 (1978) 497-504
7. Higgins C.B., Siemers P.T., Schmidt W., and Newell J.D. Evaluation of myocardial ischemic damage of various ages by computerized transmission tomography. Time-dependent effects of contrast material. Circulation 60 (1979) 284-291
8. Higgins C.B., Siemers P.T., Newell J.D., and Schmidt W. Role of iodinated contrast material in the evaluation of myocardial infarction by computerized transmission tomography. Invest Radiol 15 (1980) S176-S182
9. Lardo A.C., Cordeiro M.A., Silva C., et al. Contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography viability imaging after myocardial infarction: characterization of myocyte death, microvascular obstruction, and chronic scar. Circulation 113 (2006) 394-404
10. Hoffmann U., Millea R., Enzweiler C., et al. Acute myocardial infarction: contrast-enhanced multi-detector row CT in a porcine model. Radiology 231 (2004) 697-701
11. Mahnken A.H., Bruners P., Katoh M., Wildberger J.E., Gunther R.W., and Buecker A. Dynamic multi-section CT imaging in acute myocardial infarction: preliminary animal experience. Eur Radiol 16 (2006) 746-752
12. Mahnken A.H., Koos R., Katoh M., et al. Assessment of myocardial viability in reperfused acute myocardial infarction using 16-slice computed tomography in comparison to magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 45 (2005) 2042-2047
13. Nikolaou K., Knez A., Sagmeister S., et al. Assessment of myocardial infarctions using multidetector-row computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 28 (2004) 286-292
14. Brodoefel H., Klumpp B., Reimann A., et al. Late myocardial enhancement assessed by 64-MSCT in reperfused porcine myocardial infarction: diagnostic accuracy of low-dose CT protocols in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 17 (2007) 475-483
15. Sigal-Cinqualbre A.B., Hennequin R., Abada H.T., Chen X., and Paul J.F. Low-kilovoltage multi-detector row chest CT in adults: feasibility and effect on image quality and iodine dose. Radiology 231 (2004) 169-174
16. Mahnken A.H., Bruners P., Muhlenbruch G., et al. Low tube voltage improves computed tomography imaging of delayed myocardial contrast enhancement in an experimental acute myocardial infarction model. Invest Radiol 42 (2007) 123-129
17. Husmann L., Valenta I., Gaemperli O., et al. Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating. Eur Heart J 29 (2008) 191-197
18. Morin R.L., Gerber T.C., and McCollough C.H. Radiation dose in computed tomography of the heart. Circulation 107 (2003) 917-922
19. Thurnher S.A., Capelastegui A., Del Olmo F.H., et al. Safety and effectiveness of single- versus triple-dose gadodiamide injection-enhanced MR angiography of the abdomen: a phase III double-blind multicenter study. Radiology 219 (2001) 137-146
20. Pearson III K. Regression, heredity, and panmixia. Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution. London, UK: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London (1896) 253-318
21. Bland J.M., and Altman D.G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1 (1986) 307-310
22. Westgard J.O., and Hunt M.R. Use and interpretation of common statistical tests in method-comparison studies. Clin Chem 19 (1973) 49-57
23. Conover W. Practical Nonparametric Statistics. 2nd edition (1980), John Wiley, New York, NY
24. Ruzsics B., Suranyi P., Kiss P., et al. Automated multidetector computed tomography evaluation of subacutely infarcted myocardium. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2 (2008) 26-32
25. Nieman K., Shapiro M.D., Ferencik M., et al. Reperfused myocardial infarction: contrast-enhanced 64-section CT in comparison to MR imaging. Radiology 247 (2008) 49-56