Assessment of Myocardial Infarctions Using Multidetector-Row Computed Tomography

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 286-292

  Nikolaou, Konstantin ^a   Knez, Andreas ^a   Sagmeister, Sonja ^a   Wintersperger, Bernd J ^a   Boekstegers, Peter ^a   Steinbeck, Gerhard ^a   Reiser, Maximilian F ^a   Becker, Christoph R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Computed tomography; Coronary heart disease; Myocardial infarction

Indexed keywords

ANGIOGRAPHY; CARDIOLOGY; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY;

COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IMAGES; CONTRAST-ENHANCED; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY HEART DISEASE; EJECTION FRACTION; HOUNSFIELD UNITS; MULTIDETECTOR ROW COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; POWER;

HEART;

CONTRAST MEDIUM; IMERON 350; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; APPARATUS; APPARATUS, EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HEART INFARCTION; HEART INFARCTION SIZE; HEART VENTRICULOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VOLUMETRY;

EID: 1642347109     PISSN: 03638715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00004728-200403000-00021     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Kim RJ, Fieno DS, Parrish TB, et al. Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function. Circulation. 1999;100:1992-2002.
2. Kitagawa K, Sakuma H, Hirano T, et al. Acute myocardial infarction: myocardial viability assessment in patients early thereafter comparison of contrast-enhanced MR imaging with resting (201)T1 SPECT. Single photon emission computed tomography. Radiology. 2003;226:138-144.
3. Huber DJ, Lapray JF, Hessel SJ. In vivo evaluation of experimental myocardial infarcts by ungated computed tomography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1981;136:469-473.
4. Slutsky RA, Mattrey RF, Long SA, et al. In vivo estimation of myocardial infarct size and left ventricular function by prospectively gated computerized transmission tomography. Circulation. 1983;67:759-765.
5. Schmermund A, Gerber T, Behrenbeck T, et al. Measurement of myocardial infarct size by electron beam computed tomography: a comparison with 99mTc sestamibi. Invest Radiol. 1998;33:313-321.
6. Georgiou D, Bleiweis M, Brundage BH. Conventional and ultrafast computed tomography in the detection of viable versus infarcted myocardium. Am J Card Imaging. 1992;6:228-236.
7. Georgiou D, Wolfkiel C, Brundage BH. Ultrafast computed tomography for the physiological evaluation of myocardial perfusion. Am J Card Imaging. 1994;8:151-158.
8. Ohnesorge B, Flohr T, Becker C, et al. Cardiac imaging by means of electrocardiographically gated multisection spiral CT: initial experience. Radiology. 2000;217:564-571.
9. Becker CR, Ohnesorge BM, Schoepf UJ, et al. Current development of cardiac imaging with multidetector-row CT. Eur J Radiol. 2000;36:97-103.
10. Achenbach S, Giesler T, Ropers D, et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses by contrast-enhanced, retrospectively electrocardiographicallygated, multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation. 2001;103:2535-2538.
11. Becker CR, Knez A, Leber A, et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses with multislice helical CT angiography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2002;26:750-755.
12. Knez A, Becker CR, Leber A, et al. Usefulness of multislice spiral computed tomography angiography for determination of coronary artery stenoses. Am J Cardiol. 2001;88:1191-1194.
13. Nieman K, Oudkerk M, Rensing BJ, et al. Coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography. Lancet. 2001;357:599-603.
14. Hilfiker PR, Weishaupt D, Marincek B. Multislice spiral computed tomography of subacute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2001;104:1083.
15. Nieman K, van Ooijen P, Rensing B, et al. Four-dimensional cardiac imaging with multislice computed tomography. Circulation. 2001;103(Suppl):E62.
16. Adams DF, Hessel SJ, Judy PF, et al. Computed tomography of the normal and infarcted myocardium. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1976;126:786-791.
17. Kramer PH, Goldstein JA, Herkens RJ, et al. Imaging of acute myocardial infarction in man with contrast-enhanced computed transmission tomography. Am Heart J. 1984;108:1514-1523.
18. Masuda Y, Yoshida H, Morooka N, et al. The usefulness of x-ray computed tomography for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1984;70:217-225.
19. Berman DS, Schisterman EF, Miranda R, et al. Nuclear cardiology and electron-beam computed tomography: competitive or complementary? Am J Cardiol. 2001;88(Suppl A):51E-55E.
20. Force T, Kemper A, Perkins L, et al. Overestimation of infarct size by quantitative two-dimensional echocardiography: the role of tethering and of analytic procedures. Circulation. 1986;73:1360-1368.
21. Narahara KA, Villanueva-Meyer J, Thompson CJ, et al. Comparison of thallium-201 and technetium-99m hexakis 2-methoxyisobutyl isonitrile single-photon emission computed tomography for estimating the extent of myocardial ischemia and infarction in coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1990;66:1438-1444.
22. Gould KL, Yoshida K, Hess MJ, et al. Myocardial metabolism of fluorodeoxyglucose compared to cell membrane integrity for the potassium analogue rubidium-82 for assessing infarct size in man by PET. J Nucl Med. 1991;32:1-9.