A world model of the pulp and paper industry: Demand, energy consumption and emission scenarios to 2030

Environmental Science and Policy

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 257-269

  Szabo L ^a   Soria, A ^a   Forsstrom J ^b   Keranen J T ^b   Hytonen E ^b  

^a JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

^b VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND   (Finland)

Author keywords

Bottom up modelling; Climate change; Pulp and paper sector

Indexed keywords

CARBON;

ARTICLE; CLIMATE CHANGE; COMMERCIAL PHENOMENA; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENERGY CONSUMPTION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; EXHAUST GAS; FOREST MANAGEMENT; HEATING; PAPER INDUSTRY; POLICY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULP MILL; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; SIMULATION; SOCIOECONOMICS; TECHNOLOGY; TIME; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 64049119304     PISSN: 14629011     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2009.01.011     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Brännlund R., Chung Y., Färe R., and Grosskopf S. Emissions trading and profitability. Environmental and Resource Economics 12 (1998) 345-356
2. Bruvoll, A., Torstein, B., Larsson, J., Telle, K., 2003. Technological changes in the pulp and paper industry and the role of uniform versus selective environmental policy. Discussion Papers No. 357. Statistics Norway; Research Department. See also: http://www.ssb.no/publikasjoner/DP/pdf/dp357.pdf.
3. Criqui P. International markets and energy prices: the POLES model. In: Lesourd J.B., Perceboi's J., and Valette P. (Eds). Models for Energy Policy (1996), Routledge, London 14-29
4. Davidsdottir B., and Ruth M. Capital Vintage and climate change policies: the case of US pulp and paper. Environmental Science & Policy 7 (2004) 221-233
5. Diesen, M. (Ed.), 1998. Economics of the Pulp and Paper Industry. TAPPI and the Finish Paper Engineer's Association. ISBN 952-5216-012.
6. Eriksson H., and Harvey S. Black liquor gasification-consequences for both industry and society. Energy 29 (2004) 581-612
7. European Commission, 2003. World energy, technology and climate policy outlook 2030-WETO. Office for Official Publication of the European Communities, Luxembourg. ISBN 92 894 4186 0.
8. European Commission, EC 2003/87 directive establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC. Official Journal of the European Union 2003.
9. Food and Agricultural Organisation of the United Nations (FAO), 1998. Global Fibre Supply Model. See also: http://www.fao.org//DOCREP/006/X0105E/X0105E00.HTM.
10. 2 free paper?. Resources Conversation and Recycling 42 (2004) 317-336
11. Farla J., Blok K., and Scipper L. Energy efficiency developments in the pulp and paper industry: a cross-country comparison using physical production data. Energy Policy 25 (1997) 745-758
12. Ince, P.J., 1998. Long-range outlook for U.S. paper and paperboard demand, technology, and fiber supply-demand equilibria. In: USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory Proceedings.
13. Jaakko Pöyry Ltd., 2006. World paper markets up to 2020. Know-how Wire Magazine, January 2006. Jaakko Pöyry Ltd. See also: http://forestindustry.poyry.com/linked/en/news/KnowHowWire_January2006_internet.pdf.
14. JIRACS, 2003. Development of World Forest Products Model (WFPM). JIRACS Newsletter No. 35.
15. In: Kallio M., Dykstra D., and Binkley C. (Eds). The Global Forest Sector: An Analytical Perspective (1987), John Wiley & Sons, New York
16. Kallio, M., Moiseyev, I., Solberg, B., 2004. The Global Forest Sector Model EFI-GTM. The Model Structure. European Forest Institute, Internal Report No. 15.
17. Mannaerts, H., 2000. STREAM: substance throughput related to economic activity model: a partial equilibrium model for material flows in the economy. Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis, CPB Research Memorandum, No. 165. The Hague. ISBN 90 5833 042 7.
18. Martin, N., Anglani, N., Einstein, D., Khurshch, M., Worrell, E., Price, L.K., 2000. Opportunities to improve energy efficiency and reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the U.S. Pulp and Paper Industry. Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. LBNL-46141. See also: http://www.energystar.gov/ia/business/industry/LBNL-46141.pdf.
19. 2 reductions through energy measures in Swedish pulp and paper mills. Energy 28 (2003) 691-710
20. Ruth M., Davidsdottir B., and Laitner S. Impacts of market-based climate change policies on the US pulp and paper industry. Energy Policy 28 (2000) 259-270
21. 2 emission trading within the European Union and Annex B countries: the cement industry case. Energy Policy 34 (2006) 72-87
22. Tomberline, D., Zhu, S., Buongiorno, J., 1998. The Global Forest Products Model (GFPM): Users Manual and Guide to Installation. FAO Working Paper No. GFPOS/WP/02. Forestry Policy and Planning Division, Rome.
23. Van Vuuren D.P., Strengers B.J., and De Vries H.J.M. Long term perspectives on world metal use-a system dynamics model. Resources Policy 25 (1999) 239-255
24. International Energy Agency (IEA) (2006) Energy Balances.