Potential and cost-effectiveness of CO2 reductions through energy measures in Swedish pulp and paper mills

Energy

Volumn 28, Issue 7, 2003, Pages 691-710

  Mollersten K ^a   Yan, J ^a   Westermark, M ^a  

^a ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COST EFFECTIVENESS; ENERGY UTILIZATION; GAS EMISSIONS; PAPER AND PULP MILLS;

BLACK LIQUOR GASIFICATION (BLG);

CARBON DIOXIDE;

CARBON EMISSION; COGENERATION; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENERGY USE; PULP AND PAPER INDUSTRY;

CARBON DIOXIDE; COST EFFECTIVENESS; EMISSION; PAPER MILLS; PULP MILLS;

SWEDEN;

EID: 0037409143     PISSN: 03605442     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0360-5442(03)00002-1     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Climate Change 2001: Mitigation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
2. Nilsson JN, Larson ED, Gilbreath KR, Gupta A. Energy efficiency and the pulp and paper industry. Berkeley, CA: American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, 1995.
3. Schlamadinger B, Apps M, Bohlin L, Gustavsson L, Jungmeier G, Marland G, Pingould K, Savolainen I. Towards a standard methodology for greenhouse gas balances of bioenergy systems in comparison with fossil energy systems. Biomass and Bioenergy 1997;13(6):359-75.
4. Mannisto H, Mannisto E. The impact of the Kyoto Agreement on forest industry in Canada. In: Preprints 85th annual meeting Pulp and Paper Technical Association of Canada, Montreal, Canada. Montreal: Pulp and Paper Technical Association of Canada; 1999. p. B417-B22.
5. Bruce DM. Benchmarking energy consumption and identifying opportunities for conservation. Pulp & Paper Canada 2000;101(11):35-8.
6. Koleff AM. Energy efficiency in the US pulp and paper industry-impacts on greenhouse gas emissions. In: Proceedings 1998 TAPPI international environmental conference & exhibit, Vancouver. 1998. p. 237-44.
7. Isaksson A. Flexible and efficient biomass energy systems in the pulp industry, licenciate treatise no TRITA-KETR127. Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Chemical Engineering and Technology, 2000.
8. 2 emission quota. World Resource Review 2001;13(4):509-25.
9. 2-reducing measures in the pulp and paper industry. In: Williams DJ, Durie RA, McMullan P, Paulson CAJ, Smith AY, editors. Fifth International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies. Cairns, Australia. Collingwood: CSIRO Publishing; 2001. p. 1253-8.
10. Upton BH, Mannisto H. Technologies for reducing carbon dioxide emissions: A resource manual for pulp, paper, and wood products manufacturers, report no. 01-05. Research Triangle Park, NC: National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, 2001.
11. Khrushch M, Worrell E, Price L, Martin N, Einstein D. Carbon emissions reduction potential in the chemicals and pulp and paper industries by applying CHP technologies, report no. LBNL-43739. Berkeley, CA: LBNL, 1999.
12. Martin N, Anglani N, Einstein D, Khrushch M, Worrell E, Price LK. Opportunities to improve energy efficiency and reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the US pulp and paper industry, report no LBNL-46141. Berkeley, CA:Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 2000.
13. Swedish Forest Industries Federation. The Swedish forest industries-facts and figures 1998. Stockholm, 1999.
14. Wiberg R. Energy consumption in the pulp and paper industry 1994. Stockholm: ÅF-IPK, 1995 (in Swedish).
15. Byman K, Sjödin J. Base industry's greenhouse gas emissions. Stockholm: ÅF-Energikonsult, 1999 (in Swedish).
16. National Board of Forestry. Statistical Yearbook of Forestry 2001, Official Statistics of Sweden. Jönköping, 2001 (in Swedish).
17. STFI. The ecocyclic pulp mill phase 1, final report KAM 1 1996-1999 no. A31. Stockholm: STFI, 2000.
18. ÅF-Energikonsult. Possibilities for the industry to achieve reduced carbon dioxide emissions. Stockholm: ÅF-Energikonsult, 1999 (in Swedish).
19. Sandberg E. Future electricity utilisation-potentials for improved efficiency. Stockholm: NUTEK, 1995 (in Swedish).
20. Larson ED, Kreutz T G, Consonni S. Combined biomass and black liquor gasifier/gas turbine cogeneration at pulp and paper mills. In: Proceedings International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exhibition, Stockholm, Sweden. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 1998. p. 98-GT-339.
21. Willoughby E, Martin V, Yan J. Biomass-based systems for cogeneration of transportation fuel, electricity and heat. In: Proceedings 13th International Symposium on Alcohol Fuels, Stockholm, Sweden. 2000.
22. 2 emissions. Biomass and Bioenergy (in press).
23. Franck P-Å, Berntsson T. Analysis of certain consequences of long-term agreements for promotion of industrial energy efficiency improvements. Gothenburg: Chalmers Industriteknik, 1999 (in Swedish).
24. Swedish Energy Agency. Price sheet for biofuels, peat etc. Eskilstuna: STEM, 2000 (in Swedish).
25. Swedish Energy Agency. Environmentally-adapted efficient heating and electricity utilisation, report no. EB 8:1998. Eskilstuna: STEM, 1998 (in Swedish).
26. Elam N. Methanol and ethanol from lignocellulosic Swedish wood fuels, report no. 1994/1. Vällingby: Vattenfall Utveckling AB, 1994 (in Swedish).
27. Anon. Chemical engineering plant cost index. Chemical Engineering 2001;108(5):158.
28. Skeppe H, Alstom Power Sweden. Personal communication 03.19.2002.
29. Swedish Governmental Energy Commission. Restructuring of the energy system. Stockholm: Norstedts tryckeri AB, 1995 (in Swedish).
30. Nyberg M. Electricity conservation at Holmen Paper, Wargön mill: Energy measurements-pumps, report no. 2000 89 1050. Stockholm: Swedish State Power Board, 1989a (in Swedish).
31. Nyberg M. Electricity conservation at Holmen Paper, Wargön mill: Energy measurements-fans, report no. 2000 89 1056. Stockholm: Swedish State Power Board, 1989b (in Swedish).
32. Eriksson P.-E, Vattenfall AB. Personal communication 04.22.2000.
33. Nygaard J. Kraft recovery boilers with external superheater, report no. 628. Stockholm: Värmeforsk, 1998 (in Swedish).
34. Larson E, Consonni S, Kreutz T. Preliminary economics of black liquor gasifier/gas turbine cogeneration at pulp and paper mills. J Engng for Gas Turbines and Power 2000;122:255-61.
35. Bergqvist K., Elger R., Hagelin A., Hallia E., Nilsson H., Sundquist L., Wahlberg PE. Biofuels from gasified black liquor. Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Chemical Engineering and Technology, 2000 (in Swedish).
36. Brandberg Å Ekbom T., Hjerpe C.-J, Hjortsberg H., Landälv, I., Sävbark, B. BioMeet: planning of biomass-based methanol energy combine-Trollhättan region, report no. XVII/4.1030/Z/98-368. Stockholm: Ecotraffic R&D AB and Nykomb Synergetics AB.
37. Östling P-O, Stora Norrsundet. Personal communication 02.17.2000.
38. Häggström, R. Producer gas unit-availability and economy report no. KM 99.45. Karlsborg: AssiDomän Karlsborg, Teknikavdelningen, 1999 (in Swedish).
39. Olsson M, Svedberg G. Pre-study concerning the feasibility of using biomass fuel for lime kilns in pulp mills, report no. TRITA-KET R92. Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Chemical Engineering and Technology, 1998 (in Swedich).
40. Ekström C., Amnell G., Anheden M., Eidensten L., Kierkegaard G. Forest biomass fuel-a study of environmental consequences and economy of utilisation alternatives, report no. U 01:30. Stockholm: Vattenfall Utveckling AB.
41. 2 removal systems for fossil-fuelled power plant processes. Energy Convers Mgmt 1997;38(Suppl), S173-S178.
42. David J., Herzog H.J. The cost of carbon capture. In Williams D.J. Durie, R.A. McMullan P. Paulson CAJ, Smith, editors. Fifth International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Cairns, Australia. Collingwood: CSIRO Publishing; 2001. p. 985-90. Publishing.
43. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Technologies, policies and measures for mitigating climate change. IPCC Technical paper 1. Cambridge University Press, 1996.
44. Swedish Energy Agency. Biofuel from the forest. Report no. ER 9:2002. Eskilstuna: Swedish Energy Agency, 2002 (in Swedish).
45. 2 reductions and specific costs of the energy policy restructuring programme. Eskilstuna (Sweden): The Swedish Energy Agency, 1999 (in Swedish).
46. NUTEK. Consequences of increased biomass fuel utilisation, report no. R 1996:36. Stockholm: NUTEK, 1996 (in Swedish).
47. 2 emissions applied on district heating technologies. International Journal of Energy Research (in press).
48. Virtanen Y, Nilsson S. Some environmental policy implications of recycling paper products in western Europe, executive report no. 22. Laxenburg: IIASA, 1992.
49. Weaver P.M., Landis Gabel H., Bloemhof-Ruwaard JM., Wassenhove L.N. Optimising environmental product life cycles-A case study of the European pulp and paper sector. Environ Res Economics 1997;9:199-224.
50. Berglin N., Eriksson H., Berntsson T. Performance evaluation of competing designs for efficient cogeneration from black liquor. black liquor. In: Proceedings 2nd Biennial Johan Gullichsen Colloquium, Helsinki, Finland. Helsinki: Finnish Paper Engineers' Association; 1999. p. 55-67.
51. Lyytinen, H. (1987). Biomass gasification as a fuel supply for lime kilns: description of recent installations. Tappi J, 70(7), 77-80.