The capture of heritable variation for genetic quality through social competition

Genetica

Volumn 134, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 89-97

  Wolf, Jason B ^a   Harris, W Edwin ^a   Royle, Nick J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Competition; Competition dependent traits; Condition dependent traits; Genetic quality; Genic capture; Lek paradox

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; BEHAVIOR GENETICS; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; MALE; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; REVIEW;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; FEMALE; GENETICS, BEHAVIORAL; MALE; MODELS, GENETIC; VARIATION (GENETICS);

EID: 48149108591     PISSN: 00166707     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10709-007-9214-x     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. JC Adell V Molina JA Castro 1989 Unmasking frequency-dependent selection in tri-cultures of Drosophila melanogaster Genetica 79 77 83
2. Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton
3. MA Asmussen E Basnayake 1990 Frequency-dependent selection: the high potential for permanent genetic variation in the diallelic, pairwise interaction model Genetics 125 215 230
4. P Bijma WM Muir E Ellen 2007 Multilevel selection 2: estimating the genetic parameters determining inheritance and response selection Genetics 175 289 299
5. Borgia G (1979) Sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. In: Blum MS, Blum MN (eds) Sexual selection and reproductive competition in the insects. Academic Press, London, pp 19-80
6. Bürger R (2000) The mathematical theory of selection, recombination, and mutation. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK
7. R Bürger A Gimelfarb 2004 The effects of intraspecific comeptition and stabilizing selection on a polygenic trait Genetics 167 1425 1443
8. JA Castro A Moya JL Mènsua 1985 Comeptitive selection in mono-, di- and tri-genotype cultures of Drosophila melanogaster Zeitschrift Zool System Evol 23 214 228
9. N Colegrave 1993 Does larval competition affect fecundity independently of its effect on adult weight? Ecol Entomol 18 275 277
10. GE Dickerson 1955 Genetic slippage in response to selection for multiple objectives Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 20 213 224
11. Fisher RA (1930) The genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford
12. SA Frank M Slatkin 1992 Fisher's fundamental theorum of natural selection Trends Ecol Evol 7 92 95
13. WD Hamilton M Zuk 1982 Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites? Science 218 384 387
14. Harris WE, McKane AJ, and Wolf JB (in press) The maintenance of heritable variation through social competition. Evolution
15. M Hemmat P Eggleston 1989 Analysis of competitive interactions in tricultures of Drosophila melanogaster Heredity 64 215 222
16. Höglund J, Alatalo RV (1995) Leks. Princeton University Press, Princeton
17. Y Iwasa A Pomiankowski 1994 The evolution of mate preferences for multiple sexual ornaments Evolution 48 853 867
18. Y Iwasa A Pomiankowski S Nee 1991 The evolution of costly mate preferences. II. The "handicap" principle Evolution 45 1431 1442
19. MD Jennions M Petrie 1997 Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences Biol Rev (Cambridge) 72 283 327
20. M Kirkpatrick MJ Ryan 1991 The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek Nature 350 33 38
21. JS Kotiaho LW Simmons JL Tomkins 2001 Towards a resolution of the lek paradox Nature 410 684 686
22. Maynard Smith J (1982) Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
23. JR de Miranda M Hemmat P Eggleston 1991 The competition diallel and the exploitation and interference components of larval competition in Drosophila melanogaster Heredity 66 333 342
24. AJ Moore ED III Brodie JB Wolf 1997 Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process: I. direct and indirect genetic effects of social interactions Evolution 51 1352 1362
25. Mousseau TA, Sinervo B, Endler JA (2000) Adaptive genetic variation in the wild. Oxford University Press, New York
26. LD Mueller 1988 Evolution of competitive ability in Drosophila by density-dependent natural selection Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 85 4383 4286
27. WM Muir 2005 Incorporation of competitive effects in forest tree or animal breeding programs Genetics 170 1247 1259
28. Partridge L, Endler JA (1987) Life history constraints on sexual selection. In: Bradbury JW, Andersson M (eds) Sexual selection: testing the alternatives. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, pp 265-277
29. JM Pèrez-Tomè MA Toro 1982 Competition of similar and non-similar genotypes Nature 299 153 154
30. A Pomiankowski AP Møller 1995 A resolution of the lek paradox Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 260 21 29
31. L Rowe D Houle 1996 The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variation by condition dependent traits Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 263 1415 1421
32. B Sinervo CM Lively 1996 The rock-paper-scissors game and the evolution of alternative male strategies Nature 380 240 243
33. JL Tomkins J Radawan JS Kotiaho 2004 Genic capture and resolving the lek paradox Trends Ecol Evol 19 323 328
34. DR Weisbrot 1966 Genotypic interactions among competing strains and species of Drosophila Genetics 53 422 435
35. J Wolf 2003 Genetic architecture and evolutionary constraint when the environment contains genes Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100 4655 4660
36. JB Wolf ED III Brodie JM Cheverud 1998 Evolutionary consequences of indirect genetic effects Trends Ecol Evol 13 64 69