Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at sonographically guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy of breast mass

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 192, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 1135-1141

  Youk, Ji Hyun ^a,b   Kim, Eun Kyung ^a   Kim, Min Jung ^a  

^a Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b CHA University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Biopsy; Breast neoplasms; Needle biopsy; Sonography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATYPICAL DUCTAL HYPERPLASIA; BREAST HYPERPLASIA; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER SURGERY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CLINICAL FEATURE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MALIGNANT NEOPLASTIC DISEASE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; NEEDLE BIOPSY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADULT; AGED; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 63849327963     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.08.1144     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Liberman L. Clinical management issues in percutaneous core breast biopsy. Radiol Clin North Am 2000; 38:791-807
2. Parker SH, Burbank F, Jackman RJ, et al. Percutaneous large-core breast biopsy: a multi-institutional study. Radiology 1994; 193:359-364
3. Fajardo LL, Pisano ED, Caudry DJ, et al.; Radiologist Investigators of the Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group V. Stereotactic and sonographic large-core biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: results of the Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group V study. Acad Radiol 2004; 11:293-308
4. Meyer JE, Smith DN, Lester SC, et al. Large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions. JAMA 1999; 281:1638-1641
5. Jackman RJ, Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM. Atypical ductal hyperplasia: can some lesions be defined as probably benign after stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy, eliminating the recommendation for surgical excision? Radiology 2002; 224:548-554
6. Darling ML, Smith DN, Lester SC, et al. Atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ as revealed by large-core needle breast biopsy: results of surgical excision. AJR 2000; 175:1341-1346
7. Margenthaler JA, Duke D, Monsees BS, Barton PT, Clark C, Dietz JR. Correlation between core biopsy and excisional biopsy in breast high-risk lesions. Am J Surg 2006; 192:534-537
8. Schreer I, Luttges J. Precursor lesions of invasive breast cancer. Eur J Radiol 2005; 54:62-71
9. Bedei L, Falcini F, Sanna PA, et al. Atypical ductal hyperplasia of the breast: the controversial management of a borderline lesion-experience of 47 cases diagnosed at vacuum-assisted biopsy. Breast 2006; 15:196-202
10. Liberman L, Cohen MA, Dershaw DD, Abramson AF, Hann LE, Rosen PP. Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotaxic core biopsy of breast lesions: an indication for surgical biopsy. AJR 1995; 164:1111-1113
11. Grady I, Gorsuch H, Wilburn-Bailey S. Ultrasound-guided, vacuum-assisted, percutaneous excision of breast lesions: an accurate technique in the diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia. J Am Coll Surg 2005; 201:14-17
12. Ko E, Han W, Lee JW, et al. Scoring system for predicting malignancy in patients diagnosed with atypical ductal hyperplasia at ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2008; 112:189-195
13. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS), 4th ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2003
14. Liberman L, Feng TL, Dershaw DD, Morris EA, Abramson AF. US-guided core breast biopsy: use and cost-effectiveness. Radiology 1998; 208:717-723
15. Philpotts LE. Controversies in core-needle breast biopsy. Semin Roentgenol 2001; 36:270-283
16. Youk JH, Kim EK, Kim MJ, Oh KK. Sonographically guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy of breast masses: a review of 2,420 cases with long-term follow-up. AJR 2008; 190:202-207
17. Page DL, Dupont WD, Rogers LW, Rados MS. Atypical hyperplastic lesions of the female breast: a long-term follow-up study. Cancer 1985; 55: 2698-2708
18. Page DL, Rogers LW. Combined histologic and cytologic criteria for the diagnosis of mammary atypical ductal hyperplasia. Hum Pathol 1992; 23:1095-1097
19. Tavassoli FA, Norris HJ. A comparison of the results of long-term follow-up for atypical intraductal hyperplasia and intraductal hyperplasia of the breast. Cancer 1990; 65:518-529
20. Rao A, Parker S, Ratzer E, Stephens J, Fenoglio M. Atypical ductal hyperplasia of the breast diagnosed by 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy. Am J Surg 2002; 184:534-537
21. Liberman L, Holland AE, Marjan D, et al. Underestimation of atypical ductal hyperplasia at MRIguided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. AJR 2007; 188:684-690
22. Berg WA. Image-guided breast biopsy and management of high-risk lesions. Radiol Clin North Am 2004; 42:935-946
23. Maganini RO, Klem DA, Huston BJ, Bruner ES, Jacobs HK. Upgrade rate of core biopsy-determined atypical ductal hyperplasia by open excisional biopsy. Am J Surg 2001; 182:355-358
24. Smith DN, Rosenfield Darling ML, Meyer JE, et al. The utility of ultrasonographically guided large-core needle biopsy: results from 500 consecutive breast biopsies. J Ultrasound Med 2001; 20:43-49
25. Schoonjans JM, Brem RF. Fourteen-gauge ultrasonographically guided large-core needle biopsy of breast masses. J Ultrasound Med 2001; 20:967-972
26. Mainiero MB, Koelliker SL, Lazarus E, Schepps B, Lee CH. Ultrasound-guided large-core needle biopsy of the breast: frequency and results of repeat biopsy. J Womens Imaging 2002; 4:52-57
27. Philpotts LE, Hooley RJ, Lee CH. Comparison of automated versus vacuum-assisted biopsy methods for sonographically guided core biopsy of the breast. AJR 2003; 180:347-351
28. Crystal P, Koretz M, Shcharynsky S, Makarov V, Strano S. Accuracy of sonographically guided 14-gauge core-needle biopsy: results of 715 consecutive breast biopsies with at least two-year follow-up of benign lesions. J Clin Ultrasound 2005; 33:47-52
29. Brown TA, Wall JW, Christensen ED, et al. Atypical hyperplasia in the era of stereotactic core needle biopsy. J Surg Oncol 1998; 67:168-173
30. Hoang JK, Hill P, Cawson JN. Can mammographic findings help discriminate between atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ after needle core biopsy? Breast 2008; 17:282-288
31. Winchester DJ, Bernstein JR, Jeske JM, et al. Upstaging of atypical ductal hyperplasia after vacuum-assisted 11-gauge stereotactic core needle biopsy. Arch Surg 2003; 138:619-622
32. Adrales G, Turk P, Wallace T, Bird R, Norton HJ, Greene F. Is surgical excision necessary for atypical ductal hyperplasia of the breast diagnosed by Mammotome? Am J Surg 2000; 180:313-315
33. Houssami N, Ciatto S, Ellis I, Ambrogetti D. Underestimation of malignancy of breast core-needle biopsy: concepts and precise overall and category specific estimates. Cancer 2007; 109:487-495
34. Fishman JE, Milikowski C, Ramsinghani R, Velasquez MV, Avram G. US-guided core-needle biopsy of the breast: how many specimens are necessary? Radiology 2003; 226:779-782
35. Sohn V, Arthurs Z, Herbert G, et al. Atypical ductal hyperplasia: improved accuracy with the 11-gauge vacuum-assisted versus the 14-gauge core biopsy needle. Ann Surg Oncol 2007; 14:2497-2501
36. Cho N, Moon WK, Cha JH, et al. Sonographically guided core biopsy of the breast: comparison of 14-gauge automated gun and 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy methods. Korean J Radiol 2005; 6:102-109
37. olivar AV, Alonso-Bartolome P, Garcia EO, Ayensa FG. Ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy of on-palpable breast lesions: a prospective analysis in 204 cases. Acta Radiol 2005; 46:690-695