Conditions of practice in perceptual skill learning

Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport

Volumn 80, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 32-43

  Memmert, D ^a   Geppert, S ^a   Seiler, D ^a   Hagemann, N ^b   Althoetmar, R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Context interference; Easy to hard effect; Feedback; Perception

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COGNITION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PERCEPTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SPORT; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIME; VIDEORECORDING;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COGNITION; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR SKILLS; PERCEPTION; SPORTS; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; TIME FACTORS; VIDEO RECORDING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 63849269619     PISSN: 02701367     EISSN: 21683824     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2009.10599527     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Abernethy, B., & Russell, D. G. (1987a). Expert-novice differences in an applied selective attention task. Journal of Sport Psychology, 9, 326-345.
2. Abernethy, B., & Russell, D. G. (1987b). The relationship between expertise and visual search strategy in a racquet sport. Human Movement Science, 6, 283-319.
3. Abernethy, B., Wann, J. P., & Parks, S. L. (1998). Training perceptual-motor skills for sport. In B. Elliott (Ed.), Training in sport: Applying sport science (pp. 1-68). Chichester, England: Wiley.
4. Bilodeau, E. A. (1966). Acquisition of skill. New York: Academic Press.
5. Bjork, R. A. (1988). Retrieval practice and the maintenance of knowledge. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory, Vol. II (pp. 396-401). London: Wiley.
6. Chiviacowsky, S., & Wulf, G. (2002). Self-controlled feedback: Does it enhance learning because performers get feedback when they need it? Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 73, 408-415.
7. Coh, M., Jovanovic-Golubovic, D., & Bratic, M. (2004). Motor learning in sport. Physical Education and Sport, 2, 45-59.
8. Del Rey, P. (1989). Training and contextual interference effects on memory and transfer. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 60, 342-347.
9. Del Rey, P., Wughalter, E. H., & Whitehurst, M. (1982). The effects of contextual interference on females with varied experience in open sport skills. Research Quarterly for Exercise a, nd Sport, 53, 108-115.
10. Farrow, D., & Abernethy, B. (2002). Can anticipatory skills be learned through implicit video-based perceptual training? Journal of Sports Sciences, 20, 471-485.
11. Farrow, D., Chivers, P., Hardingham, C., & Sachse, S. (1998). The effect of video-based perceptual training on the tennis return of serve. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 29, 231-242.
12. Gabriele, T. E., Lee, T. D., & Hall, C. R. (1991). Contextual interference in movement timing: Specific effects in retention and transfer. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 20, 177-188.
13. Goldstone, R. L. (1998). Perceptual Learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 585-612.
14. Goode, S. L., & Magill, R. A. (1986). Contextual interference effects in learning three badminton serves. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 57, 308-314.
15. Guadagnoli, M. A., Dornier, L. A., & Tandy, R. D. (1996). Optimal length for summary knowledge of result: The influence of task-related experience and complexity. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 67, 239-248.
16. Guadagnoli, M. A., & Kohl, R. M. (2001). Utilization of knowledge of results for motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 33, 217-224.
17. Hagemann, N., & Memmert, D. (2006). Coaching anticipatory skill in badminton: Laboratory- versus field-based perceptual training? Journal of Human Movements Studies, 50, 381-398.
18. Hagemann, N., & Strauss, B. (2006). Perzeptive expertise von badmintonspielern [Perceptual expertise in badminton players]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 214(1), 37.
19. Hagemann, N., Strauss, B., & Canal-Bruland, R. (2006). Attention-oriented training of perceptual skills. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 28, 143-158.
20. Hall, K G., & Magill, R. A. (1995). Variability of practice and contextual interference in motor skill learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 27, 299-309.
21. Hill, H., & Pollick, F. E. (2000). Exaggerating temporal differences enhances recognition of individuals from point light displays. Psychological Science, 11, 223-228.
22. Jackson, R. C., & Farrow, D. (2005). Implicit perceptual training: How, when, and why? Human Movement Science, 24, 308-325.
23. Janelle, C. M., Barba, D. A., Frehlich, S. G., Tennant, L. K., & Cauraugh, J. H. (1997). Maximizing performance effectiveness through videotape replay and a self-controlled learning environment. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 68, 269-279.
24. Lee, T. D. (1988). Transfer-appropriate processing: A framework for conceptualizing practice effects in motor learning. In O. G. Meijer and K. Roth (eds.), Complex movement behavior: The motor-action controversy (pp. 201-215). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
25. Lee, T. D., & Magill, R. A. (1983). The locus of contextual interference in motor-skill acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, and Cognition, 9, 730-746.
26. Lee, T. D., Magill, R. A., & Weeks, D. J. (1985). Influence of practice schedule on testing schema theory predictions in adults. Journal of Motor Behavior 17, 283-299.
27. Lee, T. D., Swinnen, S. P., & Serrien, D. J. (1994). Cognitive effort and motor learning. Quest, 46, 328-344.
28. Mackintosh, N. J. (1974). The psychology of animal learning. London: Academic.
29. Magill, R. A., & Hall, K G. (1990). A review of the contextual interference effect in motor skill acquisition. Human Movement Science, 9, 241-289.
30. McNevin, N. H., Wulf, G., & Carlson, C. (2000). Effects of at- tentional focus, self-control, and dyad training effects on motor learning: Implications for physical rehabilitation. Physical Therapy, 80, 373-385.
31. Park, J-H., Shea, C. H., & Wright, D. L. (2000). Reduced-fre- quency concurrent and terminal feedback: A test of the guidance hypothesis. Journal of Motor Behavior, 32, 287-296.
32. Pollick, F. E., Fidopiastis, C., & Braden, V. (2001). Recognizing the style of spatially exaggerated tennis serves. Perception, 30, 323-338.
33. Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal ofExperimental Psychology, 32, 3-25.
34. Rhodes, G., Brennan, S., & Carey, S. (1987). Identification and ratings of caricatures: Implications for mental representations of faces. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 473-497.
35. Salmoni, A. W., Schmidt, R. A., & Walter, C. B. (1984). Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical appraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 355-386.
36. Schmidt, R. A. (1991). Frequent augmented feedback can degrade learning: Evidence and interpretations. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor neuroscience (pp. 59-75). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
37. Schmidt, R. A., & Bjork, R. A. (1992). New conceptualizations of practice. Common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training. Psychological Science, 3, 207-217.
38. Schmidt, R. A., & Wrisberg, C. A. (2000). Motor learning and performance. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
39. Schmidt, R. A., Young, D. E., Swinnen, S., & Shapiro, D. E. (1989). Summary knowledge of results for skill acquisition: Support for the guidance hypothesis. Journal ofExperimental Psychololgy: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 325-359.
40. Shapiro, D. C., & Schmidt, R. A. (1982). The schema theory: Recent evidence and developmental implications. In J. A. S. Kelso & J. E. Clark (Eds.), The development of movement control and co-ordination (pp. 113-150). New York: Wiley.
41. Shea, C. H., Kohl, R., & Indermill, C. (1990). Contextual interference: Contributions of practice. Acta Psychologies, 73, 145-157.
42. Shea, C. H., & Morgan, R. B. (1979). Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. Journal ofExperimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 179-187.
43. Shea, C. H., & Wulf, G. (2005). Schema theory: A critical appraisal and reevaluation. Journal of Motor Behavior, 37, 85-101.
44. Shea, C. H., & Zimny, S. T. (1983). Context effects in memory and learning movement information. In R. A. Magill (Ed.), Memory and control of action (pp. 345-366). Amsterdam: North Holland.
45. Sherwood, D. E. (1996). The benefits of random variable practice for spatial accuracy and error defection in a rapid aiming task. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 67, 35-43.
46. Sherwood, D. E., & Lee, T. D. (2003). Schema theory: Critical review and implications for the role of cognition in a new theory of motor learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 74, 376-382.
47. Smeeton, N. J., Williams, A. M., Hodges, N. J., & North, J. Developing perceptual skill in tennis through explicit, guided-discovery, and discovery methods. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 24(Suppl.), 175.
48. Smeeton, N. J., Williams, A. M., Hodges, N. J., & Ward, P. The relative effectiveness of various instructional approaches in developing anticipation skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11(2), 98-110.
49. Sparrow, W. A., Shinkfield, A. J., Day, R. H., Hollitt, S., & Jolley, D. (2002). Visual perception of movement kinematics and the acquisition of “action prototypes.” Motor Control, 6, 146-165.
50. Starkes, J. L., & Allard, F. (1993). Cognitive Issues in MotorExpertise. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishing.
51. Titzer, R., Shea, J. B., & Romack, J. (1993). The effect of learner control on the acquisition and retention of a motor task. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 15(Suppl.), 84.
52. Weeks, D. L., & Kordus, R. N. (1998). Relative frequency of knowledge of performance and motor skill learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 69, 224-230.
53. Wightman, D. C., & Lintern, G. (1985). Part-task training strategies for tracking and manual control. Human Factors, 27, 267-283.
54. Williams, A. M., Davids, K., & Williams, J. G. (1999). Visual perception and action in sport. London: E & F.N. Spon.
55. Williams, A. M., & Grant, A. (1999). Training perceptual skill in sport. InternationalJournal of Sport Psychology, 30, 194-220.
56. Williams, A. M., & Ward, P. (2003). Perceptual expertise: Development in sport. In J. L. Starkes & K. A. Ericsson (Eds.), Expert performance in sports (pp. 219-249). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
57. Williams, A. M., Ward, P., & Chapman, C. (2003). Training perceptual skill in field hockey: Is there transfer from the laboratory to the field. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 74, 98-103.
58. Williams, A. M., Ward, P., Knowles, J. M., & Smeeton, N. J. (2002). Anticipation skill in a real-world task: Measurement, training, and transfer in tennis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8, 259-270.
59. Williams, A. M., Ward, P., & Smeeton, N. J. (2004). Perceptual and cognitve expertise in sport. In A. M. Williams & N. J. Hodges (Eds.), Skill acquisition in sport (pp. 328-347). London: Routledge.
60. Williams, A. M., Ward, P., Smeeton, N. J., & Allen, D. (2004). Developing anticipation skills in tennis using on-court instruction: Perception versus perception and action. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 16, 350-360.
61. Winstein, C. J., & Schmidt, R. A. (1990). Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 677-691.
62. Wrisberg, C. A. (1991). A field test of the effect of contextual variety during skill acquisition. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 11, 21-30.
63. Wrisberg, C. A., & Liu, Z. (1991). The effect of contextual variety on the practice, retention, and transfer of an applied motor skill. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 6p2li, e4d0m6-o4t1o2r. skill. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport.
64. Wulf, G., McConnel, N., Gärtner, M., & Schwarz, A. (2002). Feedback and attentional focus: Enhancing the learning of sport skills through external-focus feedback. Journal of Motor Behavior, 34, 171-182.
65. Wulf, G., & Schmidt, R. A. (1994). Feedback-induced variability and the learning of generalized motor programs. Journal of Motor Behavior, 26, 348-361.
66. Wulf, G., & Shea, C. H. (2002). Principles derived from the study of simple skills do not generalize to complex skill learning. Psychonomics Bulletin and Review, 9, 185-211.
67. Wulf, G., & Shea, C. H. (2004). Understanding the role of augmented feedback: The good, the bad and the ugly. In A. M. Williams & N. J. Hodges (Eds), Skill acquisition in sport: Research theory and practice (pp. 121-144). London: Routledge.
68. Young, D. E., Cohen, M. J., & Husak, W. S. (1993). Contextual interference and motor skill acquisition: On the processes that influence retention. Human Movement Science, 12, 577-600.
69. Zelaznik, H. N. (1996). Advances in Motor Learning and Control. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.