Numerical analyses of biomechanical behavior of various orthodontic anchorage implants;Numerische Untersuchungen zum biomechanischen Verhalten verschiedener orthodontischer Ankerimplantate

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 70, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 115-127

  Stahl, Eva ^a   Keilig, Ludger ^a   Abdelgader, Iman ^a   Jäger, Andreas ^a   Bourauel, Christoph ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Bone quality; Finite element method; Mini implants; Orthodontic anchorage

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE DENSITY; BONE STRESS; CANCELLOUS BONE; CORTICAL BONE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; JAW; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MECHANICAL STRESS; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; ORTHODONTIC ANCHORAGE PROCEDURES; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TOOTH;

EID: 63849216912     PISSN: 14345293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00056-009-0817-y     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Abdelgader I. Numerical and experimental investigation of different types of mini implants used for orthodontic anchorage. Bonn: Medizinische Fakultät der Universität, Med Diss, 2006.
2. Cope JB. Temporary anchorage devices in orthodontics: A paradigm shift. Semin Orthod 2005;11:3-9.
3. Deguchi T, Nasu M, Murakami K, et al. Quantitative evaluation of cortical bone thickness with computed tomographic scanning for orthodontic implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:721.e7-721.e12.
4. Diedrich P. Verschiedene orthodontische Verankerungssysteme. Eine kritische Betrachtung. Fortschr Kieferorthop 1993;54:156-171.
5. Frost HM. A 2003 update of bone physiology and Wolff's Law for clinicians. Angle Orthod 2004;74:3-15.
6. Heibel H, Alt KW, Wachter R, et al. Kortikalisdicke am Unterkiefer unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Miniplattenosteosynthese. Morphometrische Analyse an Sektionsmaterial. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 2001;5:180-185.
7. Isidor F. Influence of forces on peri-implant bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17(Suppl 2):8-18.
8. Kahl-Nieke B. Einführung in die Kieferorthopädie. München, Jena: Urban & Fischer, 2001:184.
9. Liou EJ, Pai BC, Lin JC. Do miniscrews remain stationary under orthodontic forces? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126:42-47.
10. Ludwig B, Böhm B. Mini-Implantate in der Kieferorthopädie: innovative Verankerungskonzepte. Berlin: Quintessenz Verlags-GmbH, 2007
11. Melsen B, Lang NP. Biological reactions of alveolar bone to orthodontic loading of oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:144-152.
12. Ono A, Motoyoshi M, Shimizu N. Cortical bone thickness in the buccal posterior region for orthodontic mini-implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;37:334-340.
13. Rahimi A, Keilig L, Bendels G, et al. 3D reconstruction of dental specimens from 2D histological images and microCT-scans. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2005;8:167-176.