Against accommodation: Heim, van der Sandt, and the presupposition projection problem

Nous-Supplement: Philosophical Perspectives

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 171-205

  Gauker, Christopher ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 63849203848     PISSN: 15208583     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1520-8583.2008.00145.x     Document Type: Review

References (41)

1. Beaver, David. 2001. Presupposition and Assertion in Dynamic Semantics. CSLI Publications
2. Beaver, David & Henk Zeevat. 2007. Accommodation. In B. Ramchand & C. Reiss, eds., Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces. Oxford University Press
3. Chierchia, Gennaro. 1995. Dynamics of Meaning: Anaphora, Presupposition and the Theory of Grammar. University of Chicago Press
4. Davis, Steven. Ed. 1991. Pragmatics: A Reader. Oxford University Press
5. Gauker, Christopher. 1998. What is a context of utterance? Philosophical Studies 91: 149-172
6. Gauker, Christopher. 2001. Situated inference versus conversational implicature. Noûs 35: 163-189
7. Gauker, Christopher. 2003. Words without Meaning. MIT Press
8. Gauker, Christopher. 2005. Conditionals in Context. MIT Press
9. Geurts, Bart. 1999. Presuppositions and Pronouns. Current Research in the Semantics/ Pragmatics Interface, vol. 3. Elsevier
10. Geurts, Bart. 2005. Entertaining alternatives: disjunctions as modals. Natural Language Semantics 13: 383-410
11. Glanzberg, Michael. 2005. Presuppositions, truth values, and expressing propositions. In Gerhard Preyer and Georg Peter, eds., Contextualism in Philosophy: Knowledge, Meaning and Truth, pp. 349-396. Oxford University Press
12. Green, G. M. 1968. On too and either, and not just on too and either, either. In B. J. Darden, C.-J. N. Bailey & A. Davidson, eds., Papers from the Fourth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 22-39. Department of Linguistics, University of Chicago
13. Grice, Paul. 1989. Logic and conversation. In his Studies in the Way of Words. Harvard University Press. (Reprinted in Davis 1991.)
14. Heim, Irene. 1983. On the projection problem for presupposition. In D. P. Flickinger, M. Barlow & M. T. Wescoat, eds., Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, pp. 114-126. Stanford Linguistics Association, Dept. of Linguistics. Stanford University. (Reprinted in Davis 1991.)
15. Heim, Irene. 1988. The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. Garland Publishing
16. Heim, Irene. 1992. Presupposition projection and the semantics of attitude verbs. Journal of Semantics 9: 183-221
17. Jaszczolt, K. M. 2005. Default Semantics: Foundations of a Compositional theory of Acts of Communication. Oxford University Press
18. Kamp, Hans. 1981. A theory of truth and semantic representation. In J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen & M. Stokhof, eds., Formal Methods in the Study of Language, Part 1, pp. 277-322. Amsterdam: Mathematical Centre Tracts
19. Kamp, Hans & Uwe Reyle. 1993. From Discourse to Logic. Kluwer
20. Kaplan, David. 1989. Demonstratives: an essay on the semantics, logic, metaphysics, and epistemology of demonstratives and other indexicals. In J. Almog, J. Perry, & H. Wettstein, eds., Themes from Kaplan, pp. 481-564. Oxford University Press
21. Karttunen, Lauri. 1974. Presupposition and linguistic context. Theoretical Linguistics 1: 181-194. (Reprinted in Davis 1991.)
22. Karttunen, Lauri. & Stanley Peters. 1979. Conventional implicatures in montague grammar. In C. Oh & D. Dineen, eds., Syntax and Semantics 11: Presupposition, pp. 1-56. Academic Press
23. Keenan, Edward. L. 1973. Presupposition in natural logic. The Monist 57: 344-370
24. Krahmer, Emiel. 1998. Presupposition and Anaphora. CSLI Publications
25. Kripke, Saul. 1990. Presupposition and anaphora: remarks on the formulation of the projection problem. Unpublished manuscript. Princeton University
26. Lewis, David. 1979. Scorekeeping in a language game. Journal of Philosophical Logic 8: 339-359. (Reprinted in Davis 1991.)
27. Predelli, Stefano. 1995. Contexts: Meaning, Truth, and the Use of Language. Oxford University Press
28. Simons, Mandy. 2003. Presupposition and accommodation: understanding the Stalnakerian picture. Philosophical Studies 112: 251-278
29. Simons, Mandy. 2005a. Presupposition and relevance. In Zoltán Gendler Szabó, ed., Semantics versus Pragmatics. Oxford University Press
30. Simons, Mandy. 2005b. Dividing things up: the semantics of or and the modal/or interaction. Natural Language Semantics 13: 271-316
31. Soames, Scott. 1982. How presuppositions are inherited. Linguistic Inquiry 13: 483-545. (Reprinted in Davis 1991.)
32. Stalnaker, Robert. 1972. Pragmatics. In D. Davidson & G. Harman, eds., Semantics of Natural Language, pp. 380-397. Reidel Publishers
33. Stalnaker, Robert. 1973. Presuppositions. Journal of Philosophical Logic 2: 447-457
34. Stalnaker, Robert. 1998. On the representation of context. Journal of Language, Logic and Information 7: 3-19
35. Stalnaker, Robert. 1999. Pragmatic presuppositions. In his Context and Content, pp. 47-62. Oxford University Press. (Originally published in 1974. Also reprinted in Davis 1991.)
36. Stalnaker, Robert. 2002. Common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy 25: 701-721
37. Thomason, Richmond. 1990. Accommodation, meaning, and implicature: interdisciplinary foundations for pragmatics. In P. R. Cohen, J. Morgan & M. E. Pollack, Intentions in Communication, pp. 325-363. MIT Press
38. van der Sandt, Rob A. 1992. Presupposition projection as anaphora resolution. Journal of Semantics 9: 333-377
39. van der Sandt, Rob A. and Bart Geurts. 2001. Too. Proceedings of the 13th Amsterdam Colloquium. University of Amsterdam
40. von Fintel, Kai. 2000. What is presupposition accommodation? Unpublished manuscript. Massachusetts Institute of Technology
41. Zeevat, Henk. 2003. Particles: presupposition triggers, context markers or speech act markers. In R. Blutner & H. Zeevat, eds., Pragmatics and Optimality Theory, pp. 91-111. Palgrave