Population viability management: Ecological standards to guide adaptive management for rare species

Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 158-165

  Bakker, Victoria J ^a   Doak, Daniel F ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT; BIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS; CANID; ENDANGERED SPECIES; POPULATION MODELING; POPULATION VIABILITY ANALYSIS; RARE SPECIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SPECIES CONSERVATION; TOLERANCE;

POTATO VIRUS M;

EID: 63849087293     PISSN: 15409295     EISSN: 15409309     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/070220     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Bakker VJ, Doak DF, Roemer GW, et al. Estimating and incorporating ecological drivers and parameter uncertainty into a demographic population viability analysis for the island fox (Urocyon littoralis). Ecol Monogr. In press.
2. Bormann BT, Haynes RW, and Martin JR. 2007. Adaptive management of forest ecosystems: did some rubber hit the road? BioScience 57: 186-91.
3. Bradshaw CJA, Fukuda Y, Letnic M, et al. 2006. Incorporating known sources of uncertainty to determine precautionary harvests of saltwater crocodiles. Ecol Appl 16: 1436-48.
4. Burnham KP and Anderson D. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference, 2nd edn. New York, NY: Spring-Verlag.
5. Butterworth DS. 2007. Why a management procedure approach? Some positives and negatives. ICES J Mar Sci 64: 613-17.
6. Butterworth DS and Punt AE. 1999. Experiences in the evaluation and implementation of management procedures. ICES J Mar Sci 56: 985-98.
7. Caughley G. 1994. Directions in conservation biology. J Anim Ecol 63: 215-44.
8. Coonan TJ. 2003. Recovery strategy for island foxes (Urocyon littoralis) on the northern Channel Islands. Ventura, CA: National Park Service.
9. Coulson T, Mace GM, Hudson E, et al. 2001. The use and abuse of population viability analysis. Trends Ecol Evol 16: 219-21.
10. Dimond WJ and Armstrong DP. 2007. Adaptive harvesting of source populations for translocation: a case study with New Zealand robins. Conserv Biol 21: 114-24.
11. Fieberg J and Ellner SP. 2000. When is it meaningful to estimate an extinction probability? Ecology 81: 2040-47.
12. Gerber LR, Beger M, McCarthy MA, et al. 2005. A theory for optimal monitoring of marine reserves. Ecol Lett 8: 829-37.
13. Halpern BS, Regan HM, Possingham HP, et al. 2006. Accounting for uncertainty in marine reserve design. Ecol Lett 9: 2-11.
14. Harwood J and Stokes K. 2003. Coping with uncertainty in ecological advice: lessons from fisheries. Trends Ecol Evol 18: 617-22.
15. Hauser CE, Pople AR, and Possingham HP. 2006. Should managed populations be monitored every year? Ecol Appl 16: 807-19.
16. Island Fox Recovery Coordination Group. 2007. Recovery plan for four subspecies of island fox (Urocyon littoralis). Ventura, CA: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
17. Kendall BE. 1998. Estimating the magnitude of environmental stochasticity in survivorship data. Ecol Appl 8: 184-93.
18. Krebs CJ. 2002. Two complementary paradigms for analysing population dynamics. Philos T Roy Soc B 357: 1211-19.
19. Latta BC. 2005. Channel Islands golden eagle translocation program summary report 1999-2004. Santa Cruz, CA: Santa Cruz Predatory Bird Research Group.
20. Lindenmayer DB and Possingham HP. 1996. Ranking conservation and timber management options for leadbeater's possum in southeastern Australia using population viability analysis. ConservBiol 10: 235-51.
21. McCarthy MA, Andelman SJ, and Possingham HP. 2003. Reliability of relative predictions in population viability analysis. Conserv Biol 17: 982-89.
22. Millar RB and Meyer R. 2000. Bayesian state-space modeling of age-structured data: fitting a model is just the beginning. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 57: 43-50.
23. Milner-Gulland EJ, Shea K, Possingham H, et al. 2001. Competing harvesting strategies in a simulated population under uncertainty. Anim Conserv 4: 157-67.
24. Moore CT and Conroy MJ. 2006. Optimal regeneration planning for old-growth forest: addressing scientific uncertainty in endangered species recovery through adaptive management. Forest Sci 52:155-72.
25. Morris WF, Bloch PL, Hudgens BR, et al. 2002. Population viability analysis in endangered species recovery plans: past use and future improvements. Ecol Appl 12: 708-12.
26. Nichols JD and Williams BK. 2006. Monitoring for conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 21: 668-73.
27. Plaganyi EE, Rademeyer RA, Butterworth DS, et al. 2007. Making management procedures operational - innovations implemented in South Africa. ICES J Mar Sri 64: 626-32.
28. Punt AE. 2006. The FAO precautionary approach after almost 10 years: have we progressed towards implementing simulationtested feedback-control management systems for fisheries management? Nat Resour Model 19: 441-64.
29. Punt AE and Donovan GP 2007. Developing management procedures that are robust to uncertainty: lessons from the International Whaling Commission. ICES J Mar Sci 64: 603-12.
30. Roemer GW, Coonan TJ, Garcelon DK, et al. 2001. Feral pigs facilitate hyperpredation by golden eagles and indirectly cause the decline of the island fox. Anim Conserv 4: 307-18.
31. Rubin ES, Bakker VJ, Efford MG, et al. 2007. A population monitoring framework for five sub-species of island fox (Urocyon littoralis). Encinitas, CA: Conservation Biology Institute.
32. Spencer W, Rubin E, Stallcup J, et al. 2006. Framework monitoring plan for the San Clemente island fox with specific recommendations for the 2006 field season. Encinitas, CA: Conservation Biology Institute.
33. Staples DF, Taper ML, and Shepard BB. 2005. Risk-based viable population monitoring. Conserv Biol 19: 1908-16.
34. Thompson PM, Wilson B, Grellier K, et al. 2000. Combining power analysis and population viability analysis to compare traditional and precautionary approaches to conservation of coastal cetaceans. Conserv Biol 14: 1253-63.
35. USFWS (US Fish and Wildlife Service). 2004. Listing the San Miguel Island fox, Santa Rosa Island fox, Santa Cruz Island fox, and Santa Catalina Island fox as endangered. Federal Register 69: 10335-53. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
36. White GC. 2000. Population viability analysis: data requirements and essential analysis. In: Boitani L and Fuller TK (Eds). Research techniques in animal ecology. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
37. Yokomizo H, Haccou P, and Iwasa Y. 2004- Multiple-year optimization of conservation effort and monitoring effort for a fluctuating population. J Theor Biol 230: 157-71.