An adaptive design and interpolation technique for extracting highly nonlinear response surfaces from deterministic models

Reliability Engineering and System Safety

Volumn 94, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 1173-1182

  Shahsavani, D ^a   Grimvall, A ^b  

^a SHAHROOD UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

^b LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Computer experiments; Emulator; Exeperimental design; Interpolation; Response surface

Indexed keywords

DECOMPOSITION; DOMAIN DECOMPOSITION METHODS; INTERPOLATION; NONLINEAR CONTROL SYSTEMS; SEQUENTIAL SWITCHING; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

ADAPTIVE DESIGNS; COMPUTER CODE MODELS; COMPUTER EXPERIMENTS; DATA POINTS; DETERMINISTIC MODELS; DOMAIN DECOMPOSITIONS; EMULATOR; ENTIRE DOMAINS; EXEPERIMENTAL DESIGN; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS; HIGHLY NONLINEAR; INPUT SPACES; INPUT VARIABLES; INTERPOLATION METHODS; INTERPOLATION TECHNIQUES; MODEL OUTPUTS; NEIGHBOURHOOD; NEW DESIGNS; NON-LINEAR FEATURES; NON-LINEAR RESPONSE; POINT DESIGNS; QUADRATIC POLYNOMIALS; RESPONSE SURFACE; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGIES; SEQUENTIAL DESIGNS; SIMPLE MODIFICATIONS; SPACE FILLINGS; STRONGLY NONLINEAR; TEST RUNS;

DESIGN;

EID: 63749115553     PISSN: 09518320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2008.10.013     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Box G.E.P., and Draper N.R. A basis for the selection of a response surface design. J Am Stat Assoc 54 (1959) 622-654
2. Box G.E.P., and Draper N.R. Empirical model-building and response surfaces (1987), Wiley, New York
3. Wu C.F.J., and Hamada M. Experiments: planning, analysis, and parameter design optimization (2000), Wiley, New York
4. Myers R.H., and Montgomery D.C. Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments (2002), Wiley Interscience, New York
5. McKay M.D., Beckman R.J., and Conover W.J. A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics 21 2 (1979) 239-245
6. Iman R.L., and Conover W.J. Small sample sensitivity analysis techniques for computer models, with an application to risk assessment. Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods A9 (1980) 1749-1842
7. Iman R.L., and Conover W.J. A distribution-free approach to inducing rank correlation among input variables. Communications in Statistics: Simulation and Computation B11 (1982) 311-334
8. Sacks J., Schiller S.B., and Welch W.J. Designs for computer experiments. Technometrics 31 1 (1989) 41-47
9. Sacks J., Welch W.J., Mitchell T.J., and Wynn H.P. Design and analysis of computer experiments. Statistical Science 4 4 (1989) 409-435
10. Koehler JR. Design and estimation issues in computer experiments. Dissertation, Department of Statistics, Stanford University, 1990.
11. Koehler J.R., and Owen A.B. Computer experiments. In: Ghosh S., and Rao C.R. (Eds). Handbook of statistics vol. 13 (1996), Elsevier, Amsterdam 261-308
12. Helton J.C., and Davis F.J. Latin hypercube sampling and the propagation of uncertainty in analyses of complex systems (2002), Sandia National Laboratories, SAND2001-0417, Albuquerque, NM
13. Helton J.C., and Davis F.J. Latin hypercube sampling and the propagation of uncertainty in analyses of complex systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 81 (2003) 23-69
14. Kennedy M.C., and O'Hagan A. Predicting the output from a complex code when fast approximation are available. Biometrika 87 1 (2000) 1-13
15. Li G., Wang S.-W., and Rabitz H. Practical approaches to construct RS-HDMR component functions. J Phys Chem A 106 (2002) 8721-8733
16. Li G., Hu J., Wang S.-W., Georgopoulos P.G., Schoendorf J., and Rabitz H. Random sampling-high dimensional model representation (RS-HDMR) and orthogonality of its different order component functions. J Phys Chem A 110 (2006) 2474-2485
17. Oakley J.E., and O'Hagan A. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis of complex models: a Bayesian approach. J R Stat Soc B 66 (2004) 751-769
18. Storlie C.B., and Helton J.C. Multiple predictor smoothing methods for sensitivity analysis: description of techniques. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 93 (2008) 28-54
19. Storlie C.B., and Helton J.C. Multiple predictor smoothing methods for sensitivity analysis: example results. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 93 (2008) 55-77
20. Currin C., Mitchell T., Morris M., and Ylvisaker D. Bayesian prediction of deterministic functions, with applications to the design and analysis of computer experiments. J Am Stat Assoc 86 (1991) 953-963
21. Morris M.D., Mitchell T.J., and Ylvisaker D. Bayesian design and analysis of computer experiments: use of derivatives in surface prediction. Technometrics 35 3 (1993) 243-255
22. Welch W.J., Buck R.J., Sacks J., Wynn H.P., Mitchell T.J., and Morris M.D. Screening, predicting, and computer experiments. Technometrics 34 1 (1992) 15-25
23. Craig P.S., Goldstein M., Rougier J.C., and Seheult A.H. Bayesian forecasting for complex systems using computer simulators. J Am Stat Assoc 96 (2001) 717-729
24. Bursztyn D., and Steinberg D.M. Comparison of designs for computer experiments. J Stat Plan Inference 136 (2006) 1103-1119
25. Iske A., and Levesley J. Multilevel scattered data approximation by adaptive domain decomposition. Numer Algorithms 39 1-3 (2005) 187-198
26. Busby D., Farmer C.L., and Iske A. Hierarchical nonlinear approximation for experimental design and statistical data fitting. SIAM J Sci Comput 29 1 (2007) 49-69
27. Cressie N.A.C. Statistics for spatial data (1993), Wiley, New York
28. Chilès J.P., and Delfiner P. Geostatistics: modeling spatial uncertainty (1999), Wiley, New York
29. Schimek M.G. Smoothing and regression: approaches, computation, and application (2000), Wiley, New York
30. Silver G.L. Analysis of three-dimensional grids: five- and nine-point cubes. Appl Math Comput 160 1 (2005) 133-140
31. Whitehead P.G., Wilson E.J., and Butterfield D. A semi-distributed nitrogen model for multiple source assessments in catchments (INCA): model structure and process equations. Sci Total Environ 210-211 (1998) 547-558
32. Whitehead P.G., Wilson E.J., Butterfield D., and Seed K. A semi-distributed integrated flow and nitrogen model for multiple source assessment in catchments (INCA): application to large river basins in South Wales and Eastern England. Sci Total Environ 210-211 (1998) 559-583
33. Wade A.J., Durand P., Beaujouan V., Wessel W.W., Raat K.J., Whitehead P.G., et al. A nitrogen model for European catchments: INCA, new model structure and equations. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 6 (2002) 559-582
34. Shao J. Linear model selection by cross-validation. J Am Stat Assoc 88 (1993) 486-494
35. Krause P., Boyle D.P., and Bäse F. Comparison of different efficiency criteria for hydrological model assessment. Adv Geosci 5 (2005) 89-97
36. O'Hagan A. The Gaussian emulation machine (GEM). Accessed 2008-09-15 at 〈http://www.tonyohagan.co.uk/academic/GEM/index.htmlwww.tonyohagan.co.uk/academic/GEM/index.html〉.
37. Osidele O.O., and Beck M.B. An inverse approach to the analysis of uncertainty in models of environmental systems. Integrated Assess 4 (2003) 265-282
38. Osidele O.O., and Beck M.B. Food web modelling for investigating ecosystem behaviour in large reservoirs of the south-eastern United States: lessons from Lake Lanier, Georgia. Ecol Modell 173 (2004) 129-158