Erratum: Study on some aspects of machinability in unreinforced and reinforced polyamides (Journal of Composite Materials (2009) 43: 7 (DOI: 10.1177/0021998309101298);Study on some aspects of machinability in unreinforced and reinforced polyamides

Journal of Composite Materials

Volumn 43, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 725-739

  Gaitonde, V N ^a   Karnik, S R ^a   Mata, Francisco ^b   Davim, J Paulo ^c  

^a KLE TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (India)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CASTILLA LA MANCHA   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AVEIRO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Cemented carbide (K10) tool; Machinability; Polyamides; Response surface methodology.; Turning

Indexed keywords

CARBIDE TOOLS; MACHINABILITY; POLYAMIDES; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

CEMENTED CARBIDES; CUTTING CONDITIONS; MACHINING FORCE; METALLIC MATERIAL; PARAMETRIC -ANALYSIS; PROPERTY PROFILES; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY; SPECIFIC CUTTING PRESSURE;

TURNING;

EID: 63749114865     PISSN: 00219983     EISSN: 1530793X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0021998309350687     Document Type: Erratum

References (15)

1. Palabiyik, M. and Bahadur, S. (2002). Tribological Studies of Polyamide 6 and High-density Polyethylene Blends Filled with PTFE and Copper Oxide and Reinforced with Short Glass Fibers, Wear, 253: 369-376.
2. Mata, F., Reis, P. and Davim, J.P. (2006). Physical Cutting Model of Polyamide Composites (PA66 GF30), Mater. Sci. For., 514-516: 643-647.
3. Davim, J.P. and Mata, F. (2007). Comparative Evaluation of the Turning of Reinforced and Unreinforced Polyamide, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 33: 911-914.
4. Chavarria, F. and Paul, D.R. (2004). Comparison of Nanocomposites Based on Nylon 6 and Nylon 66, Polymer, 45: 8501-8505.
5. Chen, Y.K., Modi, O.P., Mhay, A.S., Chrysanthou, A. and O'sullivan, J.M. (2003). The Effect of Different Metallic Counter Face Materials and Different Surface Treatments on the Wear and Friction of Polyamide 66 and its Composite in Rolling - Sliding Contact, Wear, 255: 714-721.
6. Franke, R., Haase, I., Lehmann, D., Hupfer, B. and Janke, A. (2007). Manufacturing and Tribological Properties of Sandwich Materials with Chemically Bonded PTFE-PA 66 and PA 66/GF, Wear, 262: 958-971.
7. Pedrose, A.G., Mei, L.H.A., Agnelli, J.A.M. and Rosa, D.S. (2002). The Influence of the Drying Process Time on the Final Properties of Recycled Glass Fiber Reinforced Polyamide, Polym. Test., 21: 229-232.
8. Jordon J., Jacob, K.I., Tannenbaum, R., Sharaf, M.A. and Jasiuk, I. (2005). Experimental Trends in Polymer Nanocomposites - A review, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 393: 1-11.
9. Davim, J.P., Reis, P., Lapa, V. and Antonio, C.C. (2003). Machinability Study on Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Unreinforced and Reinforced (GF30) for Applications in Structural Components, Compos. Struct., 62: 67-73.
10. Davim, J.P. and Reis, P. (2004). Machinability Study on Composite (Polyetheretherketone Reinforced with 30% Glass Fiber-PEEK GF30) using Polycrystalline Diamond (PCD) and Cemented Carbide (K20) tools, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 23: 412-418.
11. Davim, J.P. and Mata, F. (2004). Influence of Cutting Parameters on Surface Roughness in Turning Glass-fiber-reinforced Plastics using Statistical Analysis, Ind. Lubr. Tribol., 56 (5). 270-274.
12. Davim, J.P. and Mata, F. (2005) Optimisation of Surface Roughness on Turning Fiber-reinforced Plastics (FRPs) with Diamond Cutting Tools, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 26: 319-323.
13. EI-Sonbaty, Khashaba, U.A. and Machaly, T. (2004). Factors Affecting the Machinability of GFR/Epoxy Composite, Compos. Struct., 63: 329-338.
14. Groover, M.P. (1996). Fundamentals of Modern Manufacturing Materials, Processes and Systems, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
15. Montgomery, D.C. (2003). Design and Analysis of Experiments, John Wiley and Sons, New York.