Pathways to the entrepreneurial university: Towards a global convergence

Science and Public Policy

Volumn 35, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 681-695

  Etzkowitz, Henry ^a   Ranga, Marina ^a   Benner, Mats ^b   Guaranys, Lucia ^c   Maculan, Anne Marie ^d   Kneller, Robert ^e  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY BUSINESS SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c FINEP   (Brazil)

^d FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC RESEARCH; CAPITAL; ENTREPRENEUR; HIGHER EDUCATION; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEM; MODELING; UNIVERSITY SECTOR;

ASIA; BRAZIL; EURASIA; EUROPE; FAR EAST; JAPAN; NORTH AMERICA; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA; SOUTH AMERICA; SWEDEN; UNITED STATES;

EID: 63749110168     PISSN: 03023427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/030234208X389701     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Benner, Mats 2003. 'Kunskapsmiljöer i förändring'. In Den vildväxande högskolan, L Kim and P Mårtens (eds.). Nora, Sweden: Nya Doxa.
2. Collins, Philip 2008. 'Karl Marx: Did he get it all right?', Times Online, 21 October 2008. Available at , last accessed on 28 October 2008.
3. David, Jeremy J 1981. Transatlantic Industrial Revolution: The Diffusion of Textile Technologies between Britain and America, 1790-1830s. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Drucker, Peter 1985. Entrepreneurship and Innovation: Practice and Principles. New York: Harper Business.
5. Etzkowitz, Henry 1983. Entrepreneurial scientists and entrepreneurial universities in American academic science. Minerva, 21, 198-233.
6. Etzkowitz, Henry 1990. The capitalization of knowledge, Theory and Society, 19(1), 107-121.
7. Etzkowitz, Henry 2003. Research groups as 'quasi-firms: The invention of the entrepreneurial university'. Research Policy, 32, 109-121.
8. Etzkowitz, Henry 2005. The renewal of venture capital: Toward a counter-cyclical model. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 17(1), 73-87.
9. Etzkowitz, Henry 2008. The Triple Helix: University-Industry-Government Innovation In Action London: Routledge.
10. Etzkowitz, H, J Dzisah and M Ranga 2008. Beyond Bologna: The Novum Trivium and transition to the European entrepreneurial university. Paper presented at the conference on Rethinking the University after Bologna, Antwerp, 12-13 December 2008.
11. Etzkowitz, H, J Mello and M Almeida 2005. Towards 'meta-innovation' in Brazil: The evolution of the incubator and the emergence of a triple helix. Research Policy, 35(4), 411-424.
12. Etzkowitz, H, J Levitt and M Gulbrandsen 2000. Public Venture Capital. New York: Harcourt.
13. Globerman, Steven and Larry Olson 1986, Government-sponsored venture capital programmes: Survey results and analysis. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 4, 7-17.
14. Goktepe, Devrim 2008. Inside the Ivory Tower: Inventors & Patents at Lund University. Lund University: Lund.
15. Hall, Peter and David Soskice 2001. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Harrison, R T and C M Mason 1989. The role of the Business Expansion Scheme in the UK. Omega, 17, 147-157.
17. Hofstadter, R 1955. Academic Freedom in the Age of the College. New York: Columbia University Press.
18. Hood, Neil 2000. Public venture capital and economic development: The Scottish experience, Venture Capital, 2(4), 313-341.
19. HSV (The Swedish National Agency for Higher Education) 2005. Högskolan samverkar. (Universities Collaborate). Stockholm: Högskoleverket.
20. Jencks, C and D Riesman 1968. The Academic Revolution. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
21. Keuschnigg, Christian 2003. Public Policy and Venture Capital Backed Innovation, LSE Working Paper no. 004. Available at , last accessed on 8 November 2008.
22. Kneller, R W 2003a. University-industry cooperation and technology transfer in Japan compared with the US: Another reason for Japan's economic malaise? University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law, 24(2), 329-449.
23. Kneller, R W 2003b. Autarkic drug discovery in Japanese pharmaceutical companies: Insights into national differences in industrial innovation. Research Policy, 32(10), 1805-1827.
24. Lerner, J 1996. The Government as Venture Capitalist: The Long Run Impact of the SBIR Programme. Harvard Business School Working Paper 96-038, Cambridge, MA, also published as: National Bureau for Economic Research Working Paper 5753. Washington, DC: National Bureau for Economic Research.
25. Mason, Colin M 2008. Public policy support for the informal venture capital market in europe: A critical review. International Small Business Journal, in press.
26. MEXT (Academic Advisory Committee, IP Working Group) 2002. Intellectual Property Working Group Report (in Japanese: Kagaku gijutsu gakujutus shingikai, gijutsu kenkyuu kiban bukai, sangakukan renkei suishin i-inkai, chiteki zaisan wakingu gu-rupu, Chiteki zaisan wa-kingu gu-rupu houkokushou) (issued 1 November 2002). Tokyo, unpublished document.
27. Mickillop, Sir Tom, Fellow of the Royal Society (2008). The Times. Monday 2 June 2008.
28. Murray, G C 1998. A policy response to regional disparities in the supply of risk capital to new technology-based firms in the European Union. Regional Studies, 32, 405-419.
29. Murray, G 1999. Seed capital funds and the effect of scale economies. Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 1, 351-384.
30. Ornstein, Martha 1928. The Role of the Scientific Societies in the Seventeenth Century. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
31. Press, E and J Washburn 2000. The kept university. Atlantic Monthly 285, 39-54.
32. Ranga, L M and H Etzkowitz 2008. Creative reconstruction: Towards a triple helix-based innovation strategy in Central and Eastern Europe Countries', In Theory and Practice of Triple Helix Model in Developing Countries. Issues and Challenges. M Saad and G Zawdie (eds.). London: Routledge.
33. Ranga L M, J Miedema and R Jorna 2008. Enhancing the innovative capacity of small firms through triple helix interactions: Challenges and opportunities. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(6), 697-716.
34. Riesman, David 1958. Constraint and Variety in American Higher Education. Lincoln, NB: University of Nebraska Press.
35. Rossiter, Margaret 1975. The Emergence of Agricultural Science: Justus Liebig and the Americans, 1840-1880. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
36. Schumpeter, Joseph A 1951. Economic theory and entrepreneurial history. In Essays on Economic Topics of Joseph Schumpeter, R V Clemence (ed.), Port Washington, NY: Kennikat Press.
37. Sellenthin, M O 2006. Beyond the Ivory Tower: A Comparison of Patent Rights Regimes in Sweden and Germany. Linköping, Sweden: Department of Technology and Social Change, Linköping University.
38. SOU (Government Commissions Report) 2005. Nyttiggörande av högskoleuppfinningar (Utilization of university inventions). Stiockholm: Fritzes.
39. Stokes, D 1997. Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
40. Sunley, P, Klagge, B, Berndt, C and Martin, R 2005. Venture capital programmes in the UK and Germany: In what sense regional policies? Regional Studies, 39(2), 255-273.
41. Thompson, C and K Bayer 1992. The Geography of 'New Entrepreneurial State' Activity: Public Venture Capital Programs in the United States. Working Paper No. 10. Madison, WI: The Robert M La Follette Institute of Public Affairs, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
42. Viale, R and H Etzkowitz 2005. The third academic revolution: Polyvalent knowledge; the DNA of the triple helix. Theme Paper for 5th Triple Helix Conference, 18-21 May 2005, Turin, Italy. Available at , last accessed 8 November 2008.
43. VINNOVA (The Swedish Governmental Agency for Innovation Systems) 2003. The Swedish National Innovation System 1970-2003. Stockholm: VINNOVA.
44. VINNOVA (The Swedish Governmental Agency for Innovation Systems) 2006. På jakt efter innovationssystem (Transl. In search of Innovation Systems). Stockholm: VINNOVA.