Clinical ligation forces and intraoral friction during sliding on a stainless steel archwire

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 123, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 408-415

  Iwasaki, Laura R ^a   Beatty, Mark W ^a   Randall, C Jared ^b   Nickel, Jeffrey C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b Department of Growth and Development ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

STAINLESS STEEL;

ARTICLE; CHEWING GUM; FRICTION; LIGATION; MASTICATION; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; ORTHODONTICS; PERIODONTAL DISEASE; WIRE FIXATION; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CALIBRATION; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MECHANICAL STRESS; OBSERVER VARIATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICS; SURFACE PROPERTY; VIBRATION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BITE FORCE; CALIBRATION; CHEWING GUM; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; FRICTION; HUMANS; LIGATION; MASTICATION; MATCHED-PAIR ANALYSIS; OBSERVER VARIATION; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; ORTHODONTIC WIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STAINLESS STEEL; STATISTICS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TOOTH MOVEMENT; VIBRATION;

EID: 0037851983     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mod.2003.61     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Sullivan D. An investigation into the three-dimensional force and movement characteristics of selected low modulus initial alignment archwires [thesis]. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba; 1982.
2. Levin KJ. The influence of ligation on orthodontic force and moment delivery [thesis]. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba; 1985.
3. Frank CA, Nikolai RJ. A comparative study of frictional resistances between orthodontic bracket and arch wire. Am J Orthod 1980;78:593-609.
4. Garner LD, Allai WW, Moore BK. A comparison of frictional forces during simulated canine retraction of a continuous edge-wise arch wire. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1986;90:199-203.
5. Kusy RP, Whitley JQ. Coefficients of friction for arch wires in stainless steel and polycrystalline alumina bracket slots. I. The dry state. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;98:300-12.
6. Bednar JR, Gruendeman GW, Sandrik JL. A comparative study of frictional forces between orthodontic brackets and arch wires. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991;100:513-22.
7. Bednar JR, Gruendeman GW. The influence of bracket design on moment production during axial rotation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;104:254-61.
8. Keith O, Jones SP, Davies EH. The influence of bracket material, ligation force and wear on frictional resistance of orthodontic brackets. Br J Orthod 1993;20:109-15.
9. Edwards GD, Davies EH, Jones SP. The ex vivo effect of ligation technique on the static frictional resistance of stainless steel brackets and archwires. Br J Orthod 1995;22:145-53.
10. Articolo LC, Kusy RP. Influence of angulation on the resistance to sliding in fixed appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;115:39-51.
11. Michelberger DJ, Eadie RL, Faulkner MG, Glover KE, Prasad NG, Major PW. The friction and wear patterns of orthodontic brackets and archwires in the dry state. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;118:662-74.
12. Hixon EH, Aasen TO, Clark RA, Klosterman R, Miller SS, Odom WM. On force and tooth movement. Am J Orthod 1970;57:476-8.
13. Braun S, Bluestein M, Moore BK, Benson G. Friction in perspective. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;115:619-27.
14. Huffman DJ, Way DC. A clinical evaluation of tooth movement along arch wires of two different sizes. Am J Orthod 1983;83:453-9.
15. Ziedenberg MJ. In vivo testing of friction on orthodontic arch wire [thesis]. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba; 1997.
16. Omana HM, Moore RN, Bagby MD. Frictional properties of metal and ceramic brackets. J Clin Orthod 1992;26:425-32.
17. Thorstenson GA, Kusy RP. Resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets versus conventional stainless steel twin brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and wet (saliva) states. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;120:361-70.
18. Sims AP, Waters NE, Birnie DJ, Pethybridge RJ. A comparison of the forces required to produce tooth movement in vitro using two self-ligating brackets and a pre-adjusted bracket employing two types of ligation. Eur J Orthod 1993;15:377-85.
19. Shivapuja PK, Berger J. A comparative study of conventional ligation and self-ligation bracket systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;106:472-80.
20. Kapila S, Angolkar PV, Duncanson MG Jr, Nanda RS. Evaluation of friction between edgewise stainless steel brackets and orthodontic wires of four alloys. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;98:117-26.
21. Yamaguchi K, Nanda RS, Morimoto N, Oda Y. A study of force application, amount of retarding force, and bracket width in sliding mechanics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;109:50-6.
22. Huget EF, Patrick KS, Nunez LJ. Observations on the elastic behavior of a synthetic orthodontic elastomer. J Dent Res 1990;69:496-501.
23. Rock WP, Wilson HJ. The effect of bracket type and ligation method upon forces exerted by orthodontic archwires. Br J Orthod 1989;16:213-7.
24. Loftus BP, Årtun J, Nicholls JI, Alonzo TA, Stoner JA. Evaluation of friction during sliding tooth movement in various bracket-arch wire combinations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;116:336-45.