Solving the correspondence problem in robotic imitation across embodiments: Synchrony, perception and culture in artifacts

Imitation and Social Learning in Robots, Humans and Animals: Behavioural, Social and Communicative Dimensions

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 249-274

  Alissandrakis, Aris ^a   Nehaniv, Chrystopher L ^a   Dautenhahn, Kerstin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HERTFORDSHIRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 63549122619     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511489808.017     Document Type: Chapter

References (14)

1. Alissandrakis, A. (2003). Imitation and Solving the Correspondence Problem for Dissimilar Embodiments -A Generic Framework. PhD thesis, University of Hert fordshire.
2. Alissandrakis, A., Nehaniv, C. L. and Dautenhahn, K. (2002). Imitation with ALICE: learning to imitate corresponding actions across dissimilar embodiments. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics: Part A, 32(4), 482-96.
3. Byrne, R. W. (1999). Imitation without intentionality. Using string parsing to copy the organization of behaviour. Animal Cognition, 2, 63-72.
4. Dautenhahn, K. and Nehaniv, C. L. (2002). An agent-based perspective on imitation. In Dautenhahn, K. and Nehaniv, C. L. (eds.), Imitation in Animals and Artifacts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1-40.
5. Dawkins, R. (1976). The Selfish Gene. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
6. Heyes, C. M. and Ray, E. D. (2000). What is the significance of imitation in animals? Advances in the Study of Behavior, 29, 215-45.
7. Kuniyoshi, Y., Inaba, M. and Inoue, H. (1994). Learning by watching: extracting reusable task knowledge from visual observations of human performance. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 10, 799-822.
8. Kuniyoshi, Y., Inoue, H. and Inaba, M. (1990). Design and implementation of a system that generates assembly programs from visual recognition of human action sequences. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Intelligent Robots and Systems IROS’90, 567-74.
9. Nehaniv, C. L. and Dautenhahn, K. (1998). Mapping between dissimilar bodies: affordances and the algebraic foundations of imitation. In Demiris, J. and Birk, A. (eds.), Proceedings of the European Workshop on Learning Robots 1998 (EWLR-7), Edinburgh, 20 July 1998, 64-72.
10. Nehaniv, C. L. and Dautenhahn, K. (2000). Of hummingbirds and helicopters: an algebraic framework for interdisciplinary studies of imitation and its applications. In Demiris, J. and Birk, A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Approaches to Robot Learning. World Scientific Series in Robotics and Intelligent Systems, 136-61.
11. Nehaniv, C. L. and Dautenhahn, K. (2001). Like me? - measures of correspondence and imitation. Cybernetics and Systems, 32(1-2), 11-51.
12. Nehaniv, C. L. and Dautenhahn, K. (2002). The correspondence problem. In Dautenhahn, K. and Nehaniv, C. L. (eds.), Imitation in Animals and Artifacts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 41-61.
13. Rendell, L. and Whitehead, H. (2001). Culture in whales and dolphins. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(2), 309-82.
14. Whiten, A., Goodall, J., McGrew, W., Nishida, T., Reynolds, V., Sugiyama, Y., Tutin, C., Wrangham, R. and Boesch, C. (1999). Cultures in chimpanzees. Nature, 399, 682-5.