Utilizing a geometry of context for enhanced implicit feedback

International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 273-282

  Melucci, Massimo ^a   White, Ryen W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^b MICROSOFT RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Geometry of information retrieval; Implicit relevance feedback

Indexed keywords

ALTERNATIVE ALGORITHMS; GEOMETRIC FRAMEWORKS; IMPLICIT FEEDBACKS; IMPLICIT RELEVANCE FEEDBACK; INTERACTION CONTEXTS; MULTIPLE SOURCES; POTENTIAL VALUES; QUERY STATEMENTS; RELEVANCE JUDGMENTS; RETRIEVAL PERFORMANCE; SEARCH SYSTEMS; SEARCH TASKS; USER STUDIES;

COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; IMAGE RETRIEVAL; INFORMATION SERVICES; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; LEARNING ALGORITHMS; METADATA;

FEEDBACK;

EID: 63449140710     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1321440.1321480     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (41)

1. N.J. Belkin. Helping people find what they don't know. Comm. of ACM, 43(8):58-61, 2000.
2. G.W. Furnas, T.K. Landauer, L.M. Gomez, and S. Dumais. The vocabulary problem in human-system communication. Comm. of the ACM, 30(11):964-971, 1987.
3. G. Salton and C. Buckley. Improving retrieval performance by relevance feedback. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(4):288-297, 1990.
4. C. Buckley, G. Salton, and J. Allan. The effect of adding relevance information in a relevance feedback environment. Proc. of SIGIR, pp. 292-300, New York, NY, USA, 1994. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.
5. M. Beaulieu. Experiments with interfaces to support query expansion. J. of IR, 53(1):8-19, 1997.
6. D. Kelly and J. Teevan. Implicit feedback for inferring user preference: a bibliography. SIGIR Forum, 37(2):18-28, 2003.
7. M. Morita and Y. Shinoda. Information filtering based on user behavior analysis and best match text retrieval. Proc. of SIGIR, pp. 272-281, New York, NY, USA, 1994. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.
8. M. Claypool, P. Le, M. Wased, and D. Brown. Implicit interest indicators. Proc. of the Int.l Conf. on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 33-40, New York, NY, USA, 2001.
9. C. Vogt. Passive feedback collection - an attempt to debunk the myth of clickthroughs. Proc. of TREC, pp. 141-150, Gaithersburg, MD, 2000.
10. E. Agichtein, E. Brill, and S. Dumais. Improving web search ranking by incorporating user behavior information. Proc. of SIGIR, pp. 19-26, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM Press.
11. R.W. White and D. Kelly. A study on the effects of personalization and task information on implicit feedback performance. Proc. of CIKM, pp. 297-306, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM Press.
12. J. Teevan, S. Dumais, and E. Horvitz. Personalizing search via automated analysis of interests and activities. Proc. of SIGIR, pp. 449-456, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM Press.
13. S. Fox, K. Karnawat, M. Mydland, S. Dumais, and T. White. Evaluating implicit measures to improve web search. ACM TOIS, 23(2):147-168, 2005.
14. T. Joachims, L. Granka, B. Pan, H. Hembrooke, and G. Gay. Accurately interpreting clickthrough data as implicit feedback. Proc. of SIGIR, pp. 154-161, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM Press.
15. D. Kelly and N.J. Belkin. Display time as implicit feedback: understanding task effects. Proc. of SIGIR, pp. 377-384, New York, NY, USA, 2004. ACM Press.
16. R.W. White, I. Ruthven, and J.M. Jose. A study of factors affecting the utility of implicit relevance feedback. Proc. of SIGIR, pp. 35-42, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM Press.
17. J. Budzik and K. Hammond. Watson: Anticipating and contextualizing information needs. Meeting of the ASIS, pp. 727-740, Medford, NJ, 1999.
18. R.W. White, I. Ruthven, and J.M. Jose. Finding relevant documents using top ranking sentences: an evaluation of two alternative schemes. Proc. of SIGIR, pp. 57-64, New York, NY, USA, 2002. ACM Press.
19. J. Kim, D.W. Oard, and K. Romanik. Using implicit feedback for user modeling in internet and intranet searching. Technical report, College of Library and Information Services, University of Maryland at College Park, 2000.
20. H. Lieberman. Letizia: An agent that assists web browsing. In Chris S. Mellish, editor, Proc. of IJCAI, pp. 924-929, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 1995. Morgan Kaufmann publishers Inc.: San Mateo, CA, USA.
21. T. Joachims, D. Freitag, and T. Mitchell. Webwatcher: A tour guide for the world wide web. Proc. of IJCAI, pp. 770-777, San Francisco, CA, 1997. Morgan Kaufmann.
22. E. Horvitz, J. Breese, D. Heckerman, D. Hovel, and K. Rommelse. The Lumiere project: Bayesian user modeling for inferring the goals and needs of software users. Proc. of the Conf. on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 256-265, Madison, WI, July 1998.
23. T. Joachims. Optimizing search engines using clickthrough data. Proc. of SIGKDD, pp. 133-142, New York, NY, USA, 2002. ACM Press.
24. F. Radlinski and T. Joachims. Query chains: learning to rank from implicit feedback. Proc. of SIGKDD, pp. 239-248, New York, NY, USA, 2005.
25. R.W. White, M. Bilenko, and S. Cucerzan. Studying the use of popular destinations to enhance web search interaction. Proc. of SIGIR, pp. 159-166, New York, NY, USA, 2007.
26. G. Salton, A. Wong, and C.S. Yang. A vector space model for automatic indexing. Comm. of the ACM, 18(11):613-620, November 1975.
27. G. Salton. Automatic Text Processing. Addison-Wesley, 1989.
28. S.K.M. Wong and V.V. Raghavan. Vector space model of information retrieval - a reevaluation. Proc. of SIGIR, pp. 167-185, Cambridge, England, 1984.
29. D. Dubin. The most influential paper Gerard Salton never wrote. Library Trends, 52(4):748-764, 2004.
30. C.J. van Rijsbergen. The Geometry of Information Retrieval. Cambridge University Press, UK, 2004.
31. M. Melucci. Context modeling and discovery using vector space bases. Proc. of CIKM, pp. 808-815, Bremen, Germany, November 2005.
32. M. Melucci. Ranking in context using vector spaces. Proc. of CIKM, pp. 477-478, Arlington, VA, USA, November 2006.
33. M. Melucci. Exploring a mechanics for context-aware information retrieval. Proc. of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Quantum Interaction, Stanford, CA, USA, March 2007. AAAI Press.
34. G. Salton. Mathematics and information retrieval. J. of Documentation, 35(1):1-29, 1979.
35. S. Deerwester, S.T. Dumais, G.W. Furnas, T. Landauer, and R. Harshman. Indexing by latent semantic analysis. J. of Am. Soc. Inf. Science, 41(6):391-407, 1990.
36. P. Ingwersen and K. Jarvelin. The Turn: Integration of Information Seeking and Retrieval in Context. Springer, 2005.
37. D. Kelly. Understanding Implicit Feedback And Document Preference: A Naturalistic User Study. PhD thesis, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 2004.
38. W. Kraaij, T. Westerveld, and D. Hiemstra. The importance of prior probabilities for entry page search. Proc. of SIGIR, pp. 27-34, Tampere, Finland, 2002. ACM Press.
39. K. Jarvelin and J. Kekalainen. Cumulated gain-based evaluation of IR techniques. ACM TOIS, 20(4):422-446, 2002.
40. A. Singhal, C. Buckley, and M. Mitra. Pivoted document length normalization. Proc. of SIGIR, pp. 21-29, Zurich, Switzerland, 1996. ACM Press.
41. I. Campbell. Interactive evaluation of the ostensive model using a new test collection of images with multiple relevance assessments. J. of IR, 2(1):85-112, 2000.