Studying the use of popular destinations to enhance web search interaction

Proceedings of the 30th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR'07

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 159-166

  White, Ryen W ^a   Bilenko, Mikhail ^a   Cucerzan, Silviu ^a  

^a MICROSOFT RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Enhanced web search; Search destinations; User studies

Indexed keywords

ENHANCED WEB SEARCH; SEARCH DESTINATIONS; USER STUDIES;

QUERY PROCESSING; SEARCH ENGINES; USER INTERFACES; WEBSITES;

WEB SERVICES;

EID: 36448946825     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1277741.1277771     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Agichtein, E., Brill, E. & Dumais, S. (2006). Improving Web search ranking by incorporating user behavior information. In Proc. SIGIR, 19-26.
2. Anderson, C. et al. (2001). Adaptive Web navigation for wireless devices. In Proc. IJCAI, 879-884.
3. Anick, P. (2003). Using terminological feedback for Web search refinement: A log-based study. In Proc. SIGIR, 88-95.
4. Beaulieu, M. (1997). Experiments with interfaces to support query expansion. J. Doc. 53, 1, 8-19.
5. Borlund, P. (2000). Experimental components for the evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems. J. Doc. 56, 1, 71-90.
6. Downey et al. (2007). Models of searching and browsing: languages, studies and applications. In Proc. IJCAI, 1465-72.
7. Dumais, S.T. & Belkin, N.J. (2005). The TREC interactive tracks: putting the user into search. In Voorhees, E.M. and Harman, D.K. (eds.) TREC: Experiment and Evaluation in Information Retrieval. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 123-153.
8. Furnas, G. W. (1985). Experience with an adaptive indexing scheme. In Proc. CHI, 131-135.
9. Hickl, A. et al. (2006). FERRET: Interactive question-answering for real-world environments. In Proc. of COLING/ACL, 25-28.
10. Jones, R., et al. (2006). Generating query substitutions. In Proc. WWW, 387-396.
11. Koenemann, J. & Belkin, N. (1996). A case for interaction: a study of interactive information retrieval behavior and effectiveness. In Proc. CHI, 205-212.
12. O'Day, V. & Jeffries, R. (1993). Orienteering in an information landscape: how information seekers get from here to there. In Proc. CHI, 438-445.
13. Radlinski, F. & Joachims, T. (2005). Query chains: Learning to rank from implicit feedback. In Proc. KDD, 239-248.
14. Salton, G. & Buckley, C. (1988) Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. Inf. Proc. Manage. 24, 513-523.
15. Silverstein, C. et al. (1999). Analysis of a very large Web search engine query log. SIGIR Forum 33, 1, 6-12.
16. Smyth, B. et al. (2004). Exploiting query repetition and regularity in an adaptive community-based Web search engine. User Mod. User Adapt. Int. 14, 5, 382-423.
17. Spink, A. et al. (2002). U.S. versus European Web searching trends. SIGIR Forum 36, 2, 32-38.
18. Spink, A., et al. (2006). Multitasking during Web search sessions. Inf. Proc. Manage., 42, 1, 264-275.
19. Wexelblat, A. & Maes, P. (1999). Footprints: history-rich tools for information foraging. In Proc. CHI, 270-217.
20. White, R.W. & Drucker, S.M. (2007). Investigating behavioral variability in Web search. In Proc. WWW, 21-30.
21. White, R.W. & Marchionini, G. (2007). Examining the effectiveness of real-time query expansion. Inf. Proc. Manage. 43, 685-704.