Weed management in peanut with herbicide combinations containing imazapic and other pesticides

Weed Technology

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 6-10

  Jordan, David L ^a   Lancaster, Sarah H ^a   Lanier, James E ^a   Lassiter, Bridget R ^a   Johnson, P Dewayne ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Pesticide compatibility; Weed management

Indexed keywords

CROP YIELD; DICOTYLEDON; FUNGICIDE; HERBICIDE; MONOCOTYLEDON; WEED CONTROL;

AMBROSIA; AMBROSIA ARTEMISIIFOLIA; ARACHIS HYPOGAEA; CHAMAESYCE NUTANS; CHENOPODIUM ALBUM; CYPERUS ESCULENTUS; DIGITARIA SANGUINALIS; ECLIPTA;

EID: 63449126877     PISSN: 0890037X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1614/WT-08-041.1     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Anonymous. 2007a. Cadre herbicide label. BASF Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC.
2. Anonymous. 2007b. Strongarm herbicide label. Dow AgroSciences, Indianapolis, IN.
3. Bailey, W. A., J. W. Wilcut, D. L. Jordan, C. W. Swann, and V. B. Langston. 1999. Weed management in peanut (Arachis hypogaea) with didosulam preemergence. Weed Technol. 13:450-456.
4. Frans, R. E., R. Talbert, D. Marx, and H. Crowley. 1986. Experimental designs and techniques for measuring and analyzing plant responses to weed control practices. Pages 29-46 in N. D. Camper, ed. Research Methods in Weed Science. Champaign, IL: Southern Weed Science Society. 486 p.
5. Grey, T. L. and G. R. Wehtje. 2005. Residual weed control systems in peanut. Weed Technol. 19:560-567.
6. Jordan, D. L. 2007. Weed management in peanuts. Pages 47-74 in 2007 Peanut Information. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University Cooperative Extension Service Series AG-331. 132 p.
7. Jordan, D. L., A. S. Culpepper, W. J. Grichar, J. Tredaway-Ducar, B. J. Brecke, and A. C. York. 2003. Weed control with combinations of selected fungicides and herbicides applied postemergence to peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Peanut Sci. 30:1-7.
8. Jordan, D. L., B. L. Robinson, and P. D. Johnson. 2007. How to lose a really good weed management research field in a hurry. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 60:193.
9. Lancaster, S. H., J. B. Beam, J. E. Lanier, D. L. Jordan, and P. D. Johnson. 2007. Weed and peanut (Arachis hypogaea) response to diclosulam applied postemergence. Weed Technol. 21:618-622.
10. Lancaster, S. H., D. L. Jordan, A. C. York, I. C. Burke, F. T. Corbiri, Y. S. Sheldon, J. W. Wilcut, and D. W. Monks. 2005. Influence of selected fungicides on efficacy of clethodim and sethoxydim. Weed Technol. 19:397-403.
11. Prostko, E. P. 2004. Strongarm applied postemergence in Georgia peanut. Proc. Am. Peanut Res. Ed. Soc. 36:30.
12. Troxler, S. C, J. A. Tredaway, D. L. Jordan, S. D. Askew, and J. W. Wilcut. 2001. Weed management in peanuts with reduced rates of diclosulam, flumioxazin, and imazapic. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 54:36.
13. Wilcut, J. W., A. C. York, W. J. Grichar, and G. R. Wehtje. 1995. The biology and management of weeds in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Pages 207-224 in H. E. Pattee and H. T. Stalker, eds. Advances in Peanut Science. Stillwater, OK: American Peanut Research and Education Society. 566 p.