Classifying species versus naming clades

Taxon

Volumn 53, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 795-798

  Cantino, Philip D ^a  

^a OHIO UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLADISTICS; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; TAXONOMY;

EID: 6344262375     PISSN: 00400262     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/4135453     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Barkley, T. M., DePriest, P., Funk, V., Kiger, R. W., Kress, W. J., McNeill, J., Moore, J., Nicolson, D. H., Stevenson, D. W. & Wheeler, Q. D. 2004a. A review of the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature with respect to its compatibility with phylogenetic classification. Taxon 53: 159-161.
2. st Century: a report from a workshop on integrating traditional nomenclature and phylogenetic classification. Taxon 53: 153-158.
3. Baum, D. A., Alverson, W. S. & Nyffeler, R. 1998. A durian by any other name: taxonomy and nomenclature of the core Malvales. Harvard Pap. Bot. 3: 315-330.
4. Bryant, H. N. & Cantino, P. D. 2002. A review of criticisms of phylogenetic nomenclature: is taxonomic freedom the fundamental issue? Biol. Rev. 77: 39-55.
5. Cantino, P. D. 2000. Phylogenetic nomenclature: addressing some concerns. Taxon 49: 85-93.
6. Cantino, P. D. & de Queiroz, K. 2003. PhyloCode: A Phylogenetic Code of Biological Nomenclature. Version 2. [http://www.ohiou.edu/phylocode/]
7. Cantino, P. D., Olmstead, R. G. & Wagstaff, S. J. 1997. A comparison of phylogenetic nomenclature with the current system: a botanical case study. Syst. Biol. 46: 313-331.
8. Cantino, P. D., Wagstaff, S. J. & Olmstead, R. G. 1999. Caryopteris (Lamiaceae) and the conflict between phylogenetic and pragmatic considerations in botanical nomenclature. Syst. Bot. 23: 369-386.
9. de Queiroz, K. 1997. The Linnaean hierarchy and the evolutionization of taxonomy, with emphasis on the problem of nomenclature. Aliso 15: 125-144.
10. de Queiroz, K. & Cantino, P. D. 2001. Phylogenetic nomenclature and the PhyloCode. Bull. Zool. Nom. 58: 254-271.
11. de Queiroz, K. & Gauthier, J. 1992. Phylogenetic taxonomy. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23: 449-480.
12. de Queiroz, K. & Gauthier, J. 1994. Toward a phylogenetic system of biological nomenclature. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9: 27-31.
13. Greuter, W., McNeill, J., Barrie, F. R., Burdet, H. M., Demoulin, V., Filgueiras, T. S., Nicolson, D. H., Silva, P. C., Skog, J. E., Trehane, P., Turland, N. J. & Hawksworth, D. L. (eds.). 2000. International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (Saint Louis Code) adopted by the Sixteenth International Botanical Congress St. Louis, Missouri, July-August 1999. Koeltz Scientific Books, Königstein. [Regnum Veg. 138.]
14. Greuter, W., McNeill, J., Barrie, F. R., Burdet, H. M., Demoulin, V., Filgueiras, T. S., Nicolson, D. H., Silva, P. C., Skog, J. E., Trehane, P., Turland, N. J. & Hawksworth, D. L. (eds.). 2000. International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (Saint Louis Code) adopted by the Sixteenth International Botanical Congress St. Louis, Missouri, July-August 1999. Koeltz Scientific Books, Königstein. [Regnum Veg. 138.]
15. Hibbett, D. S. & Donoghue, M. J. 1998. Integrating phylogenetic analysis and classification in fungi. Mycologia 90: 347-356.
16. Jørgensen, P. M. 2004. Rankless names in the Code? Taxon 53: 162.
17. Judd, W. S., Campbell, C. S., Kellogg, E. A. & Stevens, P. F. 2002. Plant Systematics: a Phylogenetic Approach, ed. 2. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
18. Kron, K. A. 1997. Exploring alternative systems of classification. Aliso 15: 105-112.
19. Moore, G., Barkley, T. M., DePriest, P., Funk, V., Kiger, R. W. & Kress, W. J. 2004. (065-067) Proposals to amend Article 3.1, Article 22.3, and Article 26.3. Taxon 53: 214.
20. Pleijel, F. & Rouse, G. W. 2003. Ceci n'est pas une pipe: names, clades and phylogenetic nomenclature. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Research 41: 162-174.
21. Zomlefer, W. B. 1994. Guide to Flowering Plant Families. Univ. North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.