Caryopteris (Lamiaceae) and the conflict between phylogenetic and pragmatic considerations in botanical nomenclature

Systematic Botany

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 369-386

  Cantino, Philip D ^a   Wagstaff, Steven J ^b   Olmstead, Richard G ^c  

^a OHIO UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LANDCARE RESEARCH   (New Zealand)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032452775     PISSN: 03636445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2419511     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. ABU-ASAB, M. S., P. D. CANTINO, J. W. NOWICKE, and T. SANG. 1993. Systematic implications of pollen morphology in Caryopteris (Labiatae). Systematic Botany 18: 502-515.
2. BRIQUET, J. 1895. Verbenaceae. Pp. 132-182 in Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, eds. A. Engler and K. Prantl, teil 4, abt. 3a. Leipzig, Germany: W. Engelmann.
3. BRUMMITT, R. K. 1997. Taxonomy versus cladonomy, a fundamental controversy in biological systematics. Taxon 46: 723-734.
4. _ and M. S. M. SOSEF. 1998. Paraphyletic taxa are inherent in Linnaean classification - a reply to Freudenstein. Taxon 47: 411-412.
5. CAIN, A. J. 1959. The post-Linnaean development of taxonomy. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London 170: 234-244.
6. CANTINO, P. D. 1992. Evidence for a polyphyletic origin of the Labiatae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 79: 361-379.
7. _. 1998. Binomials, hyphenated uninomials and phylogenetic nomenclature. Taxon 47: 425-429.
8. _, R. M. HARLEY, and S. J. WAGSTAFF. 1992. Genera of Labiatae: status and classification. Pp. 511-522 in Advances in labiate science, eds. R. M. Harley and T. Reynolds. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
9. _, R. G. OLMSTEAD, and S. J. WAGSTAFF. 1997. A comparison of phylogenetic nomenclature with the current system: a botanical case study. Systematic Biology 46: 313-331.
10. CATALÁN, P., E. A. KELLOGG, and R. G. OLMSTEAD. 1997. Phylogeny of Poaceae subfamily Pooideae based on chloroplast ndhF gene sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 8: 150-166.
11. CHEN, S.-L. and M. G. GILBERT. 1994. Caryopteris. Pp. 43-47 in Flora of China, eds. Z.-Y. Wu and P. H. Raven, vol.17. Beijing: Science Press.
12. CRONQUIST, A. 1978. Once again, what is a species? Pp. 3-20 in Biosystematics in agriculture, ed. J. A. Romberger. Montclair, New Jersey: Allanheld, Osmun & Co.
13. _. 1981. An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
14. _. 1987. A botanical critique of cladism. Botanical Review 53: 1-52.
15. DAVIS, J. I. 1995. A phylogenetic structure for the monocotyledons, as inferred from chloroplast DNA restriction site variation, and a comparison of measures of clade support. Systematic Botany 20: 503-527.
16. DE QUEIROZ, K. 1996. A phylogenetic approach to biological nomenclature as an alternative to the Linnaean systems in current use. In Proceedings of a mini-symposium on biological nomenclature in the 21st century, ed. J. L. Reveal [http://www.life.umd.edu/ bees/96sym.html].
17. _. 1997. The Linnaean hierarchy and the evolutionization of taxonomy, with emphasis on the problem of nomenclature. Aliso 15: 125-144.
18. _. 1998 The general lineage concept of species, species criteria, and the process of speciation: a conceptual unification and terminological recommendations. Pp. 57-75, in Endless forms: species and speciation, eds. D. J. Howard and S. H. Berlocher. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
19. _ and J. GAUTHIER. 1990. Phylogeny as a central principle in taxonomy: phylogenetic definitions of taxon names. Systematic Zoology 39: 307-322.
20. _ and _. 1992. Phylogenetic taxonomy. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 23: 449-480.
21. _ and _. 1994. Toward a phylogenetic system of biological nomenclature. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9: 27-31.
22. DONOGHUE, M. J. and P. D. CANTINO. 1988. Paraphyly, ancestors, and the goals of taxonomy: a botanical defense of cladism. Botanical Review 54: 107-128.
23. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phytogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
24. FREUDENSTEIN, J. V. 1998. Paraphyly, ancestors, and classification - a response to Sosef and Brummitt. Taxon 47: 95-104.
25. MADDISON, D. R. 1991. The discovery and importance of multiple islands of most-parsimonious trees. Systematic Zoology 40: 315-328.
26. _, M. RUVOLO, and D. L. SWOFFORD. 1992. Geographic origins of human mitochondrial DNA: phylogenetic evidence from control region sequences. Systematic Biology 41: 111-124.
27. MICHENER, C. D. 1964. The possible use of uninominal nomenclature to increase the stability of names in biology. Systematic Zoology 13: 182-190.
28. OWENS, S. J. and J. L. UBERA-JIMÉNEZ. 1992. Breeding systems in Labiatae. Pp. 257-280 in Advances in labiate science, eds. R. M. Harley and T. Reynolds. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
29. PEI, C. and S.-L. CHEN. 1982. Verbenaceae. Flora reipublicae popularis sinicae, vol. 65 (1). Beijing: Science Press.
30. RICE, K. A., M. J. DONOGHUE, and R. G. OLMSTEAD. 1997. Analyzing large data sets: rbcL 500 revisited. Systematic Biology 46: 554-563.
31. RIMPLER, H., C. WINTERHALTER, and U. FALK. 1992. Cladistic analysis of the subfamily Caryopteridoideae Briq. and related taxa of Verbenaceae and Lamiaceae using morphological and chemical characters. Pp. 39-54 in Advances in labiate science, eds. R. M. Harley and T. Reynolds. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
32. SCHANDER, C. 1998. Mandatory categories and impossible hierarchies - a reply to Sosef. Taxon 47: 407-410.
33. _ and M. THOLLESSON. 1995. Phylogenetic taxonomysome comments. Zoologica Scripta 24: 263-268.
34. SOSEF, M. S. M. 1997. Hierarchical models, reticulate evolution and the inevitability of paraphyletic supraspecific taxa. Taxon 46: 75-85.
35. SU, S.-W. 1985. A study on the two types of flowers in Schnabelia oligophylla
36. Handel-Mazzetti. Bulletin of Botanical Research 5: 109-120.
37. SWOFFORD, D. L. 1991. PAUP: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 3.1. Champaign: Illinois Natural History Survey.
38. WAGSTAFF, S. J. and R. G. OLMSTEAD. 1997. Phylogeny of Labiatae and Verbenaceae inferred from rbcL sequences. Systematic Botany 22: 165-179.
39. _, L. HICKERSON, R. SPANGLER, P. A. REEVES, and R. G. OLMSTEAD. 1998. Phylogeny and character evolution in Labiatae s.l., inferred from cpDNA sequences. Plant Systematics and Evolution 209: 265-274.
40. WELZEN, P. C. VAN. 1998. Phylogenetic versus Linnaean taxonomy, the continuing story. Taxon 47: 413-423.
41. WU, C. Y. and S. CHOW. 1962. Cardioteucris C. Y. Wu, Holocheila (Kudo) S. Chow - duo genera nova labiatarum ex Provencia Yunnan. Acta Botanica Sinica 10: 247-252.