Modeled climate change effects on distributions of Canadian butterfly species

Canadian Journal of Zoology

Volumn 82, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 851-858

  Peterson, A Townsend ^a   Martínez Meyer, Enrique ^b   González Salazar, Constantino ^b   Hall, Peter W ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

^c UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME WORLD CONSERVATION MONITORING CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ECOLOGY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

BUTTERFLY SPECIES; PHENOLOGY; POLITICAL CIRCLES;

BIODIVERSITY;

BIODIVERSITY; BUTTERFLY; CLIMATE CHANGE; GENERAL CIRCULATION MODEL; NICHE; PHENOLOGY; ZOOGEOGRAPHY;

CANADA; NORTH AMERICA;

INVERTEBRATA; LEPIDOPTERA;

EID: 6344256673     PISSN: 00084301     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/Z04-064     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Anderson, R.P., Lew, D., and Peterson, A.T. 2003. Evaluating predictive models of species' distributions: criteria for selecting optimal models. Ecol. Model. 162: 211-232.
2. Austin, M.P., Nicholls, A.O., and Margules, C.R. 1990. Measurement of the realized qualitative niche: environmental niches of five Eucalyptus species. Ecol. Monogr. 60: 161-177.
3. Bakkenes, M., Alkemade, J.R.M., Ihle, F., Leemansand, R., and Latour, J.B. 2002. Assessing effects of forecasted climate change on the diversity and distribution of European higher plants for 2050. Global Change Biol. 8: 390-407.
4. Carey, P.D., and Brown, N.J. 1994. The use of GIS to identify sites that will become suitable for a rare orchid, Himantoglossum hircinum L., in a future changed climate. Biodivers. Lett. 2: 117-123.
5. Carpenter, G., Gillison, A.N., and Winter, J. 1993. DOMAIN: a flexible modeling procedure for mapping potential distributions of animals and plants. Biodivers. Conserv. 2: 667-680.
6. Chapin, F.S.I., Zavaleta, E.S., Eviner, V.T., Naylor, R.L., Vitousek, P.M., Reynolds, H.L., Hooper, D.U., Lavorel, S., Sala, O.E., Hobbie, S.E., Mack, M.C., and Diaz, S. 2000. Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature (Lond.), 405: 234-242.
7. Dobson, A., Jolly, A., and Rubenstein, D. 1989. The greenhouse effect and biological diversity. Trends Ecol. Evol. 4: 64-68.
8. Emanuel, W.R., Shugart, H.H., and Stevenson, M.P. 1985. Climate change and the broad-scale distribution of terrestrial ecosystem complexes. Clim. Change, 7: 29-43.
9. Erasmus, B.F.N., Van Jaarsveld, A.S., Chown, S.L., Kshatriya, M., and Wessels, K.J. 2002. Vulnerability of South African animal taxa to climate change. Global Change Biol. 8: 679-693.
10. Flato, G.M., Boer, G.J., Lee, W.G., McFarlane, N.A., Ramsden, D., Reader, M.C., and Weaver, A.J. 1999. The Canadian Center for Climate Modelling and Analysis Global Coupled Model and its climate. Clim. Dyn. 16: 451-467.
11. Foley, J.A., Prentice, I.C., Ramankutty, N., Levis, S., Pollard, D., Sitch, S., and Haxeltine, A. 1996. An integrated biosphere model of land surface processes, terrestrial carbon balance and vegetation dynamics. Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 10: 603-628.
12. Grinnell, J. 1917. Field tests of theories concerning distributional control. Am. Nat. 51: 115-128.
13. Haxeltine, A., and Prentice, I.C. 1996. BIOME3: An equilibrium terrestrial biosphere model based on ecophysiological constraints, resource availability and competition among plant functional types. Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 10: 693-709.
14. Huntley, B., Berry, P.M., Cramer, W., and McDonald, A.P. 1995. Modelling present and potential future ranges of some European higher plants using climate response surfaces. J. Biogeogr. 22: 967-1001.
15. Inouye, D.W., Barr, B., Armitage, K.B., and Inouye, B.D. 2000. Climate change is affecting altitudinal migrants and hibernating species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97: 1630-1633.
16. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2003. Climate data archive. Available from http://www.ipcc.ch/ [accessed 1 February 2003].
17. Kadmon, R., and Heller, J. 1998. Modelling faunal responses to climatic gradients with GIS: land snails as a case study. J. Biogeogr. 25: 527-539.
18. Karl, T.R., Knight, R.W., Easterling, D.R., and Quayle, R.G. 1996. Indices of climate change for the United States. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 77: 279-292.
19. Kerr, J.T. 2001. Butterfly species richness patterns in Canada: energy, heterogeneity, and the potential consequences of climate change. Conserv. Ecol. [online], 5: 10. Available from http://www.consecol.org/vol15/iss11/art10 [cited 1 March 2003].
20. King, G.A., and Leemans, R. 1990. Effects of global climate change on global vegetation. In Response and feedback of forest systems to global climate change. Edited by G.A. King, J.K. Winjun, P.K. Dixon, and L.Y. Arnaut. Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, Oreg.
21. MacArthur, R. 1972. Geographical ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
22. Magnuson, J. 2001. 150-year global ice record reveals major warming trend. Inter-Am. Inst. Global Change Res. 24: 22-25.
23. Melillo, J.M., Prentice, I.C., Farquhar, G.D., Schulze, E.-D., and Sala, O.E. 1996. Terrestrial biotic responses to environmental change and feedbacks to climate. In Climate change 1995: the science of climate change. Edited by J.T. Houghton, L.G. Meira Filho, B.A. Callander, N. Harris, A. Kattenberg, and K. Maskell. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. pp. 444-481.
24. Nakicenovic, N., and Swart, R. (Editors). 2000. Emissions scenarios: a special report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
25. Parmesan, C. 1996. Climate and species' range. Nature (Lond.), 382: 765-766.
26. Parmesan, C., and Yohe, G. 2003. A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature (Lond.), 421: 37-42.
27. Parmesan, C., Ryrholm, N., Stefanescu, C., Hill, J.K., Thomas, C.D., Descimon, H., Huntley, B., Kaila, L., Kullberg, J., Tammaru, T., Tennent, J., Thomas, J.A., and Warren, M. 1999. Poleward shift of butterfly species' ranges associated with regional warming. Nature (Lond.), 399: 579-583.
28. Peters, R.L., and Darling, J.D.S. 1985. The greenhouse effect and nature reserves. Bioscience, 35: 707-717.
29. Peters, R.L., and Myers, J.P. 1991-1992. Preserving biodiversity in a changing climate. Issues Sci. Technol. 1991-1992: 66-72.
30. Peterson, A.T. 2001. Predicting species' geographic distributions based on ecological niche modeling. Condor, 103: 599-605.
31. Peterson, A.T. 2003. Projected climate change effects on Rocky Mountain and Great Plains birds: generalities of biodiversity consequences. Global Change Biol. 9: 647-655.
32. Peterson, A.T., and Cohoon, K.C. 1999. Sensitivity of distributional prediction algorithms to geographic data completeness. Ecol. Model. 117: 159-164.
33. Peterson, A.T., and Vieglais, D.A. 2001. Predicting species invasions using ecological niche modeling. Bioscience, 51: 363-371.
34. Peterson, A.T., Soberon, J., and Sanchez-Cordero, V. 1999. Conservatism of ecological niches in evolutionary time. Science (Wash., D.C.), 285: 1265-1267.
35. Peterson, A.T., Sanchez-Cordero, V., Soberon, J., Bartley, J., Buddemeier, R.H., and Navarro-Siguenza, A.G. 2001. Effects of global climate change on geographic distributions of Mexican Cracidae. Ecol. Model. 144: 21-30.
36. Peterson, A.T., Ball, L.G., and Cohoon, K.C. 2002a. Predicting distributions of tropical birds. Ibis, 144: e27-e32.
37. Peterson, A.T., Ortega-Huerta, M.A., Bartley, J., Sanchez-Cordero, V., Soberon, J., Buddemeier, R.H., and Stockwell, D.R.B. 2002b. Future projections for Mexican faunas under global climate change scenarios. Nature (Lond.), 416: 626-629.
38. Peterson, A.T., Sanchez-Cordero, V., Beard, C.B., and Ramsey, J.M. 2002c. Ecologic niche modeling and potential reservoirs for Chagas disease, Mexico. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 8: 662-667.
39. Peterson, A.T., Stockwell, D.R.B., and Kluza, D.A. 2002d. Distributional prediction based on ecological niche modeling of primary occurrence data. In Predicting species occurrences: issues of scale and accuracy. Edited by J.M. Scott, P.J. Heglund, and M.L. Morrison. Island Press, Washington, D.C. pp. 617-623.
40. Pope, V.D., Gallani, M.L., Rowntree, V.J., and Stratton, R.A. 2002. The impact of new physical parametrizations in the Hadley Centre climate model - HadAM3. Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research, Bracknell, Berks, U.K.
41. Prentice, I.C., and Webb, N.R. 1989. Developing a global vegetation dynamics model: results of an IIASA summer workshop. RR-89-7. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.
42. Prentice, I.C., and Webb, T., III. 1998. BIOME 6000: reconstructing global mid-Holocene vegetation patterns from palaeoecological records. J. Biogeogr. 25: 997-1005.
43. Prentice, I.C., Cramer, W., Harrison, S.P., Leemans, R., Monserud, R.A., and Solomon, A.M. 1992. A global biome model based on plant physiology and dominance, soil properties and climate. J. Biogeogr. 19: 117-134.
44. Price, J. 2000. Modeling the potential impacts of climate change on the summer distributions of Massachusetts passerines. Bird Observ. 28: 224-230.
45. Rutherford, M.C., Powrie, L.W., and Schulze, R.E. 2000. Climate change in conservation areas of South Africa and its potential impact on floristic composition: a first assessment. Divers. Distrib. 5: 253-262.
46. Scachetti-Pereira, R. 2002. Desktop GARP. Available from http:// www.lifemapper.org/desktopgarp/ [accessed 1 February 2003].
47. Siqueira, M.F.D., and Peterson, A.T. 2003. Global climate change consequences for cerrado tree species. Biota Neotrop. [online], 3(2): 1-14. Available from http://www.biotaneotropica.org.br/v3n2/pt/abstract? article+BN00803022003 [cited 1 June 2003].
48. Stockwell, D.R.B. 1999. Genetic algorithms II. In Machine learning methods for ecological applications. Edited by A.H. Fielding. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston. pp. 123-144.
49. Stockwell, D.R.B., and Noble, I.R. 1992. Induction of sets of rules from animal distribution data: a robust and informative method of analysis. Math. Comp. Simul. 33: 385-390.
50. Stockwell, D.R.B., and Peters, D.P. 1999. The GARP modelling system: problems and solutions to automated spatial prediction. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Syst. 13: 143-158.
51. Stockwell, D.R.B., and Peterson, A.T. 2002a. Controlling bias in biodiversity data. In Predicting species occurrences: issues of scale and accuracy. Edited by J.M. Scott, P.J. Heglund, and M.L. Morrison. Island Press, Washington, D.C. pp. 537-546.
52. Stockwell, D.R.B., and Peterson, A.T. 2002b. Effects of sample size on accuracy of species distribution models. Ecol. Model. 148: 1-13.
53. Tian, H., Hall, C., and Qi, Y. 1998. Modeling primary productivity of the terrestrial biosphere in changing environments: toward a dynamic biosphere model. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 15: 541-557.
54. Tian, H., Melillo, J.M., Kicklighter, D.W., McGuire, A.D., Moore, B., III, and Vörösmarty, C.J. 1999. Parameters for global ecosystem models. Nature (Lond.), 399: 536.
55. U.S. Geological Survey. 2000. Hydro-1K data set. Available from http://edcdaac.usgs.gov/gtopo30/hydro/ [accessed 1 June 2002].
56. Visser, M.E., van Noordwijk, A.J., Tinbergen, J.M., and Lessells, C.M. 1998. Warmer springs lead to mistimed reproduction in great tits (Parus major). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 265: 1867-1870.
57. Walker, P.A., and Cocks, K.D. 1991. HABITAT: a procedure for modelling a disjoint environmental envelope for a plant or animal species. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. Lett. 1: 108-118.
58. Walther, G.-R., Post, E., Convey, P., Menzel, A., Parmesan, C., Beebee, T.J.C., Fromentin, J.-M., Hoegh-Guldberg, X.X., and Bairlein, F. 2002. Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature (Lond.), 416: 389-395.