The oil drop experiment: An illustration of scientific research methodology and its implications for physics textbooks

Instructional Science

Volumn 32, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 357-386

  Rodríguez, María A ^a   Niaz, Mansoor ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE ORIENTE   (Venezuela)

Author keywords

history and philosophy of science; Millikan Ehrenhaft controversy; oil drop experiment; physics textbooks

Indexed keywords

EID: 6344240567     PISSN: 00204277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:TRUC.0000044641.19894.ed     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. American Association of Physics Teachers, AAPT (1999). What is science? American Journal of Physics 67: 659.
2. Arons, A.B. (1990). A Guide to Introductory Physics Teaching. New York: Wiley.
3. Auerbach, D. (2000).What is science - isn't there more to it? American Journal of Physics 67: 305.
4. Bär, R. (1922). Naturwissenschaften 10: 344-345.
5. Brush, S.G. (2000). Thomas Kuhn as a historian of science. Science and Education 9: 39-58.
6. Cartwright, N. (1983). How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
7. Dirac, P.A.M. (1977). Ehrenhaft, the subelectron and the quark. In C. Weiner, ed., History of Twentieth Century Physics, pp. 290-293. New York: Academic Press.
8. Dobson, K. (2000). Is physics debatable? Physics Education 35: 1.
9. Ehrenhaft, F. (1910a). Uber die kleinsten messbaren elektrizitä tsmengen. Zweite vorläufige mitteilung der methode zur bestimmung des elektrischen elementarquantums. Anzeiger Akad. Wiss (Vienna) 10: 118-119.
10. Ehrenhaft, F. (1910b). Uber die messung von elektrizitätsmengen, die ladung des einwertigen wasserstoffions oder elektrons zu unterschreiten scheinen. Zweit vorläufige mitteilung seiner methode zur bestimmung des elektrischen elementarquantums. Anzeiger Akad. Wiss (Vienna) 13: 215.
11. Ehrenhaft, F. (1914). Annalen der Physik 44: 657.
12. Ehrenhaft, F. (1941). The microcoulomb experiment. Philosophy of Science 8: 403-457.
13. Fairbank, W. & Franklin, A. (1982). Did Millikan observe fractional charges on oil drops? American Journal of Physics 50: 394-397.
14. Gell-Mann, M. (1971). How scientists can really help. Physics Today 24: 23-25.
15. Giere, R.N. (1995). The skeptical perspective: Science without laws of nature. In F. Weinert, ed., Laws of Nature: Essays on the Philosophical, Scientific and Historical Dimensions, pp. 120-138. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
16. Goodstein, D. (2001). In defense of Robert Andrews Millikan. American Scientist 89: 54-60.
17. Hellemans, A. (1999). Picking up bits of the electron's charge. Science 284: 1251.
18. Holton, G. (1978). Subelectrons, presuppositions, and the Millikan-Ehrenhaft dispute. Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 9: 161-224.
19. Holton, G. (1986). The Advancement of Science and its Burdens. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20. Holton, G. (2000). Personal communication, September.
21. Jones, L.W. (1977). A review of quark search experiments. Review of Modern Physics 49: 717-752.
22. Jones, R.C. (1995). The Millikan oil-drop experiment: Making it worthwhile. American Journal of Physics 63: 970-977.
23. Kapusta, J.I. (1975). Best measuring time for a Millikan oil drop experiment. American Journal of Physics 43: 799-800.
24. Kitcher, P. (1993). The Advancement of Science: Science without Legend, Objectivity without Illusions. New York: Oxford University Press.
25. Kragh, H. (1999). Quantum Generations: A History of Physics in the Twentieth Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26. Kuhn, T.S. (1970a). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2nd edn.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27. Kuhn, T.S. (1970b). Logic of discovery or psychology of research? In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave, eds., Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, pp. 1-23. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28. Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave, eds., Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, pp. 91-195. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
29. LaRue, G.S., Phillips, J.D. & Fairbank, W.M. (1981). Observation of fractional charge of (1/3) e on matter. Physics Review Letters 46: 967.
30. Laudan, L. (1996). Beyond Positivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
31. Laudan, R., Laudan, L. & Donovan, A. (1988). Testing theories of scientific change. In A. Donovan, L. Laudan & R. Laudan eds., Scrutinizing Science: Empirical Studies of Scientific Change, pp. 3-44. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
32. Lorentz, H.A. (1952). The Theory of Electrons. New York: Dover. (Original work Published 1909).
33. Mar, N.M., Lee, E.R., Fleming, G.R., C.K. Casey, B., Perl, M.L., Garwin, E.L., Hendricks, C.D., Lackner, K.S. & Shaw, G.L. (1996). Improved search for elementary particles with fractional electric charge. Physical Review D 53: 6017-6032.
34. Millikan, R.A. (1903). Mechanics Molecular Physics and Heat. Boston: Ginn.
35. Millikan, R.A. (1910). A new modification of the cloud method of determining the elementary electrical charge and the most probable value of that charge. Philosophical Magazine 19: 209-228.
36. Millikan, R.A. (1911). Physical Review 32: 349.
37. Millikan, R.A. (1913). On the elementary electrical charge and the Avogadro constant. Physical Review 2: 109-143.
38. Millikan, R.A. (1916). The existence of a subelectron? Physical Review 8: 595-625.
39. Millikan, R.A. (1917). The Electron: Its Isolation and Measurement and the Determination of some of its Properties. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40. Millikan, R.A. (1947). Electrons (+ and -), Protons, Photons, Neutrons, and Cosmic Rays (2nd edn.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press (first published in 1935).
41. Millikan, R.A. (1950). The Autobiography of Robert A. Millikan. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall, Inc.
42. Millikan, R.A. (1965). The electron and the light-quant from the experimental point of view (Nobel prize acceptance speech, 1923). Nobel Lectures: Physics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
43. Millikan, R.A. & Begeman, L. (1908). On the charge carried by the negative ion of an ionized gas. Physical Review 26: 197-198.
44. Niaz, M. (1998). From cathode rays to alpha particles to quantum of action: a rational reconstruction of structure of the atom and its implications for chemistry textbooks. Science Education 82: 527-552.
45. Niaz, M. (2000a). The oil drop experiment: A rational reconstruction of the Millikan-Ehrenhaft controversy and its implications for chemistry textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37: 480-508.
46. Niaz, M. (2000b). A rational reconstruction of the kinetic molecular theory of gases based on history and philosophy of science and its implications for chemistry textbooks. Instructional Science 28: 23-50.
47. Niaz, M. (2001). Understanding nature of science as progressive transitions in heuristics principles. Science Education 85: 684-690.
48. Perl, M.L. & Lee, E.R. (1997). The search for elementary particles with fractional electric charge and the philosophy of speculative experiments. American Journal of Physics 65: 698-706.
49. Pickering, A. (1984). Constructing Quarks: A Sociological History of Particle Physics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
50. Polanyi, M. (1964). Personal Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press (first published 1958).
51. Redish, E.F. (1999). Millikan lecture 1998: Building a science of teaching physics. American Journal of Physics 67(7): 562-573.
52. Segal, B.G. (1989). Chemistry: Experiment and Theory (2nd edn.). New York: Wiley.
53. Seife, C. (2000). CERN stakes claim on new state of matter. Science 287: 949-951.
54. Stinner, A. (1989). The teaching of physics and the contexts of inquiry: from Aristotle to Einstein. Science Education 73: 591-605.
55. Thomson, J.J. (1898). Philosophical Magazine 46: 528.
56. Townsend, J.S. (1897). Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 9: 244.
57. Wilson, H.A. (1903). Philosophical Magazine 5: 429.
58. Wilson, D. (1983). Rutherford: Simple Genius. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.