Phylogeny of Maculinea blues (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) based on morphological and ecological characters: Evolution of parasitic myrmecophily

Cladistics

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 362-375

  Pech, Pavel ^a   Fric, Zdeněk ^a,b   Konvička, Martin ^a,b   Zrzavý, Jan ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH BOHEMIA   (Czech Republic)

^b INSTITUTE OF ENTOMOLOGY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUTTERFLY; EVOLUTION; HOST-PARASITE INTERACTION; MORPHOLOGY; MYRMECOPHILY; PHYLOGENY;

ARION; CAMPANULACEAE; FORMICIDAE; GENTIANACEAE; GLAUCOPSYCHE; LAMIACEAE; LEPIDOPTERA; LYCAENIDAE; MACULINEA; MACULINEA ALCON; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; PAPILIONOIDEA; POLYOMMATINAE; ROSACEAE;

EID: 6344240554     PISSN: 07483007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2004.00031.x     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Agenjo, R., 1967. Morfología y distribución geográfica en España de la 'Escamas azules' Glaucpsyche melanops (B., 1828) (Lep. Lycaenidae). Eos, 43, 13-20.
2. Akino, T., Knapp, J.J., Thomas, J.A., Elmes, G.W., 1999. Chemical mimicry and host specificity in the butterfly Maculinea rebeli, a social parasite of Myrmica ant colonies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. 266, 1419-1426.
3. Als, T.D., Nash, D. R., Boomsma, J.J., 2002. Geographical variation in host-ant specificity of the parasitic butterfly Maculinea alcon in Denmark. Ecol. Entomol. 27, 403-414.
4. Angiosperm Phylogeny Group, 2003. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 141, 399-436.
5. Asahi, J., Kanda, S., Kawata, M., Kohara, Y., 1999. The Butterflies of Sakhalin in Nature. Hokkaido Shimbun Press, Sapporo, Japan.
6. Bálint, Z., 1989. Hairstreaks, coppers and blues from Mongolia (Lep., Lycaenidae). Atalanta, 19, 87-100.
7. Beldade, P., Koops, K., Brakefield, P.M., 2002. Modularity, individuality, and evo-devo in butterfly wings. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 99, 14262-14267.
8. Beneš, J., Konvièka, M., Dvoøák, J., Fric, Z., Havelda, Z., Pavlièko, A., Vrabec. V., Weidenhoffer, Z., 2002. Butterflies of the Czech Republic: Distribution and Conservation. Spoleènost pro ochranu motýlù, Praha.
9. Berlov, O., 2001. Tsvetnoi Atlas-Opredelitel' Dnevnykh Babochek Basseina Ozera Baikal [Coloured Determination Key of the Butterflies of the Lake Baikal Basin]. URL: http://babochki.narod.ru.
10. Bernardi, G., 1972. Note sur la variation géographique de l'armure génitale mâle des Iolana (Lep. Lycaenidae). B. Soc. Entomol. Fr. 77, 160-167.
11. Beuret, H., 1958. Zur systematischen Stellung einiger wenig bekannter Glaucopsychidi (Lep., Lycaenidae). Mitt. Entomol. Ges. Basel, 8, 81-100.
12. Brakefield, P.M., 2003. The power of evo-devo to explore evolutionary constraints: experiments with butterfly eyespots. Zoology, 106, 283-290.
13. Cano, J.M., 1981. Similitudes biologicas y diferentias ecologicas entre Glaucopsyche alexis (Poda) y Glaucopsyche melanops (Boisduval). (Lep. Lycaenidae). B. Estation Centr. Ecol. 10, 59-70.
14. D'Abrera, B., 1993. Butterflies of Holarctic region III. Nymphalidae (Concl.), Libytheidae, Riodinidae & Lycaenidae. Hill House, Black Rock, pp. 336-524.
15. Ebert, G., Rennwald, E., 1991. Die Schmetterlinge Baden- Württembergs. Band 1: Tagfalter 2. Eugen Ulmer, Hohenheim.
16. Elfferich, N.W., 1998. New facts on the life history of the dusky large blue Maculinea nausithous (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) obtained by breeding with Myrmica ants in plaster nests. Deinsea, 4, 97-102.
17. Eliot, J.N., 1973. The higher classification of the Lycaenidae (Lepidoptera): a tentative arrangement. Bull. Br. Mus. Nat. Hist. (Entomology), 28, 373-505.
18. Elmes, G.W., Akino, T., Thomas, J.A., Clarke, R.T., Knapp, J.J., 2002. Intespecific differences in cuticular hydrocarbon profiles of Myrmica ants are sufficiently consistent to explain host specificity by Maculinea (large blue) butterflies. Oecologia, 130, 525-535.
19. Elmes, G.W., Thomas, J.A., 1992. Complexity of species conservation in managed habitats: interaction between Maculinea butterflies and their ant hosts. Biodivers. Conserv. 1, 155-169.
20. Elmes, G.W., Thomas, J.A., Munguira, M.L., Fiedler, K., 2001. Larvae of lycaenid butterflies that parasitize ant colonies provide exceptions to normal insect growth rules. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 73, 259-278.
21. Elmes, G.W., Thomas, J.A., Wardlaw, J.C., 1991. Larvae of Maculinea rebeli, a large-blue butterfly, and their Myrmica host ants: wild adoption and behaviour in ant-nests. J. Zool. 223, 447-460.
22. Emmet, A.M., Heath, J., 1989. The Moths and Butterflies of Great Britain and Ireland, Vol. 7, Part 1. Hesperiidae-Nymphalidae. The Butterflies. Harley Books, Colchester, UK.
23. Fiedler, K., 1990. New information on the biology of Maculinea nausithous and M. teleius. Nota Lepid. 12, 246-256.
24. Fiedler, K., 1991. Systematic, evolutionary, and ecological implications of myrmecophily within the Lycaenidae [Insecta: Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea]. Bonner Zoologische Monographien, no. 31.
25. Fiedler, K., 1994. Lycaenid butterflies and plants: is myrmecophily associated with amplified hostplant diversity? Ecol. Entomol. 19, 79-82.
26. Fiedler, K., 1995. Lycaenid butterflies and plants - is myrmecophily associated with particular hostplant preferences? Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 7, 107-132.
27. Fiedler, K., 1998. Lycaenid-ant interactions of the Maculinea type: tracing their historical roots in a comparative framework. J. Insect Conserv. 2, 3-14.
28. Freudenstein, J.V., Pickett, K., Simmons, M.P., Wenzel, J.W., 2003. From basepairs to birdsongs: phylogenetic data in the age of genomics. Cladistics, 19, 333-347.
29. Fukuda, H., Hama, E., Kuzuya, T., Takahashi, A., Takahashi, M., Tanaka, B., Tanaka, H., Wakabayashi, M., Watanabe, Y., 1985. The Life Histories of Butterflies in Japan, Vol. III. Hoikusha, Osaka, Japan.
30. Goloboff, P., 1999. NONA (NO NAME), Version 2.0. Published by the author, Tucumán, Argentina. URL: http://www.cladistics.com/aboutNona.htm.
31. Grant, T., Kluge, A.G., 2003. Data exploration in phylogenetic inference: scientific, heuristic, or neither. Cladistics, 19, 379-418.
32. Hemming, A.F., 1931. Revision of the genus Iolana, Bethune-Baker (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae). Trans. Entomol. Soc. Lond. 79, 323-333.
33. Hesselbarth, G., Van Oorschot, H., Wagener, S., 1995. Die Tagfalter der Türkei unter Berücksichtingung der angrenzenden Länder. Selbstverlag Sigbert Wagener, Bocholt.
34. Higgins, L.G., 1975. The Classification of European Butterflies. Collins, London.
35. Hochberg, M.E., Clarke, R.T., Elmes, G.W., Thomas, J.A., 1994. Population dynamic consequences of direct and indirect interactions involving a large blue butterfly and its plant and red hosts. J. Anim. Ecol. 63, 375-391.
36. Igarashi, S., Fukuda, H., 2000. The Life History of Asian Butterflies, 2. Tokai Daigaku Shuppankai, Tokyo.
37. Inomata, T., 1990. Keys to the Japanese Butterflies in Natural Color. Hokuryukan, Tokyo.
38. Jaksic, P.N., 1998. Male Genitalia of Butterflies on the Balkan Peninsula with a Checklist (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea and Papilionoidea). Slamka, Bratislava.
39. Janz, N., Nyblom, K., Nylin, S., 2001. Evolutionary dynamics of host-plant specialization: a case study of the tribe Nymphalini. Evolution, 55, 783-796.
40. Karsholt, O., Razowski, J., 1996. The Lepidoptera of Europe: a Distributional Checklist. Apollo Books, Stenstrup.
41. Kawazoe, A., Wakabayshi, M., 1976. Colored Illustrations of the Butterflies of Japan. Hoikusha Publishing, Osaka.
42. Korshunov, Y., Gorbunov, P., 1995. Dnevnye Babochki Aziatskoi Chasti Rossii: Spravochnik [Butterflies of the Asian Part of Russia: a Handbook]. Ural University Press, Ekaterinburg.
43. Kudrna, O., 2001. Miscellaneous notes on the taxonomy of four European butterflies (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera). Entomol. Gaz. 52, 253-261.
44. Kurentsov, A.I., 1970. Bulavousye Cheshuekryle Dalnego Vostoka SSSR: Opredelitel' [Rhopaloceran Butterflies of Far East of the USSR: A Key to Determination.] Nauka, Leningrad.
45. Larsson, S., Ekbom, B., 1995. Oviposition mistakes in herbivorous insects: confusion, or a step towards a new host plant? Oikos, 72, 155-160.
46. Leimar, O., Axén, A., 1993. Strategic behaviour in an interspecific mutualism: interactions between lycaenid larvae and ants. Anim. Behav. 46, 1177-1182.
47. Mattoni, R.H.T., 1977. The Scolitantidini I: Two new genera and a generic rearrangement (Lycaenidae). J. Res. Lepid. 16, 223-242.
48. Mattoni, R.H.T., [1981] 1979. The Scolitantidini II. The World's smallest butterfly? Notes on Turanana, and a new genus and species from Afghanistan. (Lycaenidae). J. Res. Lepid. 18, 256-264.
49. Mattoni, R.H.T., Fiedler, K., 1991. On the functional foreleg tarsus in Caerulea males (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae: Polyommatini). J. Res. Lepid. 30, 289-296.
50. Nijhout, H.F., 1991. The Development and Evolution of Butterfly Wing Pattern. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
51. Park, K.T., Kim, S.S., 1997. Atlas of Butterflies (Lepidoptera). Insects of Korea, Series 1. Korea. Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology and Center for Insect Systematics, Chuncheon.
52. Pierce, N.E., Braby, M.F., Heath, A., Lohman, D.J., Mathew, J., Rand, D.B., Travassos, M.A., 2002. The ecology and evolution of ant association in the Lycaenidae (Lepidoptera). Annu. Rev. Entomol. 47, 733-771.
53. Renwick, J.A.A., Chew, F.S., 1994. Oviposition behavior in Lepidoptera. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 39, 377-400.
54. Shirozu, T., 1960. Butterflies of Formosa in Color. Hoikosha, Osaka, Japan.
55. Sibatani, A., Saigusa, T., Hirowatari, T., 1994. The genus Maculinea van Eecke, 1915 (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) from East Palaearctic Region. Tyo to Ga, 44, 157-220.
56. Stankiewicz, A., Sielezniew, M., 2002. Host specificity of Maculinea teleius Bgstr. and M. nausithous Bgstr. (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae): the new insight. Ann. Zool. 52, 403-408.
57. Steiner, F.M., Sielezniew, M., Schlick-Steiner, B.C., Höttinger, H., Stankiewicz, A., Górnicki, A., 2003. Host specificity revisited: new data on Myrmica host ants of the lycaenid butterfly Maculinea rebeli. J. Insect Conserv. 7, 1-6.
58. Thomas, J.A., 1980. Why did the large blue become extinct in Britain? Oryx, 15, 243-247.
59. Thomas, J.A., 1994. The ecology and conservation of Maculinea arion and other European species of large blue. In: Pullin, A.S. (Ed.), Ecology and Conservation of Butterflies. Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 180-196.
60. Thomas, J.A., Elmes, G.W., 1998. Higher productivity at the cost of increased host-specificity when Maculinea butterfly larvae exploit ant colonies through trophallaxis rather than by predation. Ecol. Entomol. 23, 457-464.
61. Thomas, J.A., Elmes, G.W., Wardlaw, J.C., Woyciechowski, M., 1989. Host specificity among Maculinea butterflies in Myrmica ant nests. Oecologia, 79, 452-457.
62. Thomas, J.A., Munguira, M.L., Martin, J., Elmes, G.W., 1991. Basal hatching by Maculinea butterfly eggs: a consequence of advanced myrmecophily? Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 44, 175-184.
63. Tolman, T., Lewington, R., 1997. Butterflies of Britain and Europe. Harper and Collins, London.
64. Tuzov, V.K., Bogdanov, P.V., Churkin, S.V., Devyatkin, A.L., Danchenko, A.V., Murzin, V.S., Samodurov, G.D., Zhdanko, A.B., 2000. Guide to the Butterflies of Russia and Adjacent Territories (Lepidoptera, Rhopalocera), Vol. 2: Libytheidae, Danaidae, Nymphalidae, Riodinidae, and Lycaenidae. Pensoft, Sofia.
65. Van Swaay, C.A.M., Warren, M.S., 1999. Red Data Book of European Butterflies (Rhopalocera). Nature and Environment Series No. 99. Council of Europe, Strasbourg.
66. Vane-Wright, R.I., 2003. Evidence and identity in butterfly systematics. In: Boggs, C.L., Watt, W.B., Ehrlich, P.R. (Eds.), Butterflies: Ecology and Evolution Taking Flight. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 477-513.
67. Wahlberg, N., 2001. The phylogenetics and biochemistry of host-plant specialization in Melitaeine butterflies (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Evolution, 55, 522-537.
68. Wahlberg, N., Nylin, S., 2003. Morphology versus molecules: resolution of the positions of Nymphalis, Polygonia, and related genera (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Cladistics, 19, 213-223.
69. Wardlaw, J.C., Elmes, G.W., Thomas, J.A., 1998. Techniques for studying Maculinea butterflies. II. Identification guide to Myrmica ants found on Maculinea sites in Europe. J. Insect Conserv. 2, 119-127.
70. Wardlaw, J.C., Thomas, J.A., Elmes, G.W., 2000. Do Maculinea rebeli caterpillars provide vestigial mutualistic benefits to ants when living as social parasites inside Myrmica ant nests? Entomol. Exp. Appl. 95, 97-103.
71. Wynhoff, I., 1998a. Lessons from the reintroduction of Maculinea teleius and M. nausithous in the Netherlands. J. Insect Conserv. 2, 47-57.
72. Wynhoff, I., 1998b. The recent distribution of the European Maculinea species. J. Insect Conserv. 2, 15-27.