A platform to develop and to improve effectiveness of online computable guidelines

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 95, Issue , 2003, Pages 800-805

  Dufour, Jean Charles ^a   Fieschi, Marius ^a   Fieschi, Dominique ^a   Giorgi, Roch ^a   Gouvernet, Joanny ^a  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

Author keywords

Computer Assisted; Decision Making; Internet standards; Practice Guidelines; Systems Integration

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING;

COMPUTER ASSISTED; GUIDELINE INTERCHANGE FORMAT; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; QUALITY CRITERIA; SOFTWARE COMPONENT; SYSTEMS INTEGRATION; WEB ARCHITECTURE; XML SPECIFICATIONS;

SOFTWARE TESTING;

EID: 6344219610     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-939-4-800     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. Grimshaw JM, Russell IT. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: A systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet 1993; 342(8883):1317-22.
2. Johnston ME, Langton KB, Haynes RB, Mathieu A. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on clinician performance and patient outcome. A critical appraisal of research. Ann Intern Med 1994; 120(2):135-42.
3. Davis DA, Thomson MA, Oxman AD, Haynes RB. Evidence for the effectiveness of CME. A review of 50 randomized controlled trials. JAMA 1992; 268(9):1111-7.
4. Durieux P, Ravaud P, Dosquet P, Durocher A. [Effectiveness of clinical guideline implementation strategies: systematic review of systematic reviews]. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2000; 24(11):1018-25.
5. Stolte JJ, Ash J, Chin H. The dissemination of clinical practice guidelines over an intranet: An evaluation. Proc AMIA Symp 1999; 960-4.
6. Tierney WM, Overhage JM, McDonald CJ. Computerizing guidelines: factors for success. Proc AMIA Symp 1996; 459-62.
7. Johnson P, Tu S, Jones N. Achieving Reuse of Computable Guideline Systems. Medinfo 2001; 99-103.
8. Greenes RA, Peleg M, Boxwala A, Tu S, Patel V, Shortliffe EH. Sharable Computer-based Clinical Practice Guidelines: Rationale, Obstacles, Approaches, and Prospects. Medinfo 2001; 201-5.
9. Peleg M, Boxwala AA, Ogunyemi 0 et al. GLIF3: The evolution of a guideline representation format. Proc AMIA Symp 2000; 645-9.
10. Peleg M, Boxwala A, Tu S, Greenes RA, Shortliffe EH, Patel V. Handling Expressiveness and Comprehensibility Requirements in GLIF3. Medinfo 2001; 241-5.
11. Dufour JC, Giorgi R, Fieschi D et al. Guideline Development: Focus on Breast Cancer Screening in the EsPeR Project. Medinfo 2001; 439-43.