Guideline development: Focus on breast cancer screening in the EsPeR project

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 84, Issue , 2001, Pages 439-443

  Dufour, Jean Charles ^a   Giorgi, Roch ^a   Fieschi, Dominique ^a   Gouvernet, Joanny ^a   Gillois, Pierre ^b   Piana, Lucien ^c   Degoulet, Patrice ^b   Fieschi, Marius ^a  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

^b HÔPITAL BROUSSAIS   (France)

^c HÔPITAL DE LA CONCEPTION   (France)

Author keywords

Breast Cancer Screening; Computer Assisted Screening; Decision Making; Internet; Practice Guidelines; Risk

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; DISEASES; INTERNET; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISKS;

BREAST CANCER; BREAST CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES; COMPUTER ASSISTED; GENERAL METHODOLOGIES; GENERAL PRACTITIONERS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; REAL TIME;

DIAGNOSIS;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; HUMAN; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; RISK FACTOR;

ALGORITHMS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DECISION MAKING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; HUMANS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 84888036477     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-928-8-439     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, Wu AW, Wilson MH, Abboud PA, and Rubin HR. Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA 1999; 282(15): 1458-65.
2. Woolf SH. Practice guidelines, a new reality in medicine. II. Methods of developing guidelines. Arch Intern Med 1992; 152(5): 946-52.
3. Owens DK. Use of medical informatics to implement and develop clinical practice guidelines. West J Med 1998; 168(3): 166-75.
4. Duijm LE, Zaat JO, and Guit GL. [Mammographic surveillance of breast cancer patient relatives; implementation of guidelines formulated by the Netherlands College of General Practitioners]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1998; 142(14): 778-81.
5. MSnegoz F and Cherie-Challine L. Le cancer en France: incidence et mortalite. Situation en 1995. Evolution entre 1975 et 1995. Ministere de l'emploi et de la solidarite. Paris, 1999.
6. Gail MH, Brinton LA, Byar DP, Corle DK, Green SB, Schairer C, and Mulvihill J J. Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annualy. J Natl Cancer /ns/ 1989; 81(24): 1879-86.
7. Taplin S, Thompson RS, Schnitzer, Anderman C, and Immanuel V. Revisions in the risk-based breast cancer screening program at Group Health Cooperative. Cancer 1990; 66(4): 812-8.
8. Zielstorff RD. Online practice guidelines: issues, obstacles, and future prospects. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1998; 5(3): 227-36.
9. Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine (Online). Available: http: //cebm.jr2.ox.ac.uk [November 2000].
10. Ohno-Machado L, Gennari JH, Murphy SN, Jain NL, Tu SW, Oliver DE, Pattison-Gordon E, Greenes RA, Shortliffe EH, and Barnett GO. The guideline interchange format: a model for representing guidelines. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1998; 5(4): 357-72.
11. Gordon C, Herbert SI, and Johnson P. Knowledge representation and clinical practice guidelines: the DILEMMA and PRESTIGE projects. In: Brender J, Christensen JP, Scherrer JR, and McNair P, eds. Medical Informatics Europe 96. Amsterdam, The Nertherlands, 1996 511-5.
12. JILOG™ Company (Online). Available: http: //www.ilog.com [November 2000].
13. Giorgi R, Gouvernet J, Jougla E, Chatellier G, Degoulet P, and Fieschi M. The use of the personalized estimate of death probabilities for medical decision making. Comput BiomedRes 2000; 33(1): 75-83.
14. Gail MH and Benichou J. Assessing the risk of breast cancer in individuals. In: De Vita VT Jr., Hellman S and Rosenberg SA, eds. Cancer Prevention. Lippincott, Philadelphia, 1992 1-15.
15. Bondy ML, Lustbader ED, Halabi S, Ross E, and Vogel VG. Validation of a breast cancer risk assessment model in women with a positive family history. J Natl Cancer Inst 1994; 86(8): 620-25.
16. Spiegelman D, Colditz GA, Hunter D, and Hertzmark E. Validation of the Gail et al. model for predicting individual breast cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst 1994; 86(8): 600-07.
17. Feinstein AR, and Horwitz RI. Problems in the "evidence" of "evidence-based medicine". Am J Med 1997; 103(6): 529-35.
18. Tierney WM, Overhage JM, and McDonald CJ. Computerizing guidelines: factors for success. Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp 1996: 459-62.
19. Shiffman RN, Karras BT, Agrawal A, Chen R, Marenco L, and Nath S. GEM: a proposal for a more comprehensive guideline document model using XML. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2000; 7(5): 488-98.
20. Peleg M, Boxwala AA, Ogunyemi O, Zeng Q, Tu S, Lacson R, Bernstam E, Ash N, Mork P, Ohno-Machado L, Shortliffe EH, and Greenes R. GLIF3: The Evolution of a Guideline Representation Format. Proc AMIA Symp 2000: 645-9