Semantics-driven development for electronic government applications

Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages

  Crichton, Charles ^a   Davies, Jim ^a   Gibbons, Jeremy ^a   Harris, Steve ^a   Shukla, Aadya ^a   Tsui, Andrew ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION THEORY; SEMANTICS;

ELECTRONIC GOVERNMENTS; EXISTING METHODS; MODEL-DRIVEN DEVELOPMENT; PROJECTS FAILS; SEMANTIC TECHNOLOGIES; TECHNICAL CHALLENGES; TECHNOLOGY GAPS;

GOVERNMENT DATA PROCESSING;

EID: 63349110670     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2009.384     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. D. Aldrich, J.C. Berot, and C. McLure. E-government : Initiatives, developments and issues. Government Information Quaterly, 19, 2002.
2. World Bank. egovernment practice group. http://go.worldbank.org/ C81XI6R6F0.
3. Karine Barzilai-Nahon and Hans J. (Jochen) Scholl. Similarities and differences of e-commerce and e-government: Insights from a pilot study. In Proceedings of the 40th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE, 2007.
4. T. Bovaird. Public-private partnership : From contested concepts to practice. Journal of Public Administration, 70, 2004.
5. Radu Calinescu, Steve Harris, Jeremy Gibbons, Jim Davies, Igor Toujilov, and Sylvia B. Nagl. Model-driven architecture for cancer research. In The 5th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering and Formal Methods (SEFM 2007), pages 59-68, 2007.
6. S.D. Clarke. e-GIF, e-GMS and IPSV: What's In It For Us? Legal Information Management, 7(04):275-277, 2007.
7. Commission of the European Communities. The i2010 eGovernment action plan. Technical report, European Union, 2007. http://ec.europa.eu/idabc/ servlets/Doc?id=25286.
8. Wm. Arthur Conklin. Barriers to adoption of e-Government. In Proceedings of the 40th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2007.
9. Sharon S. Dawes, Meghan E. Cook, and Natalie Helbig. Challenges of treating information as a public resource: The case of parcel data. In Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2006.
10. Department of Justice and Department of Homeland Security. National Information Exchange Model. http://www.niem.gov.
11. S. Glaister. Past abuses and future uses of private finance and public private partnerships in transport. Public Money and Management, 19, 1999.
12. Steve Harris, Jim Davies, Charles Crichton, Aadya Shukla, and Jeremy Gibbons. Metadata Standards for Semantic Interoperability in Electronic Government. In ICEGOV 2008, 2008. to appear.
13. S.A. Hazlett and F. Hill. E-government: the realities of using it to transform the public sector. Managing Service Quality, 13, 2003.
14. R. Heeks. Success and failure rates of eGovernment in developing/transitional countries: Overview. www.egov4dev.org/sfoverview.htm, 2003.
15. Marijn Janssen and Anthony Cresswell. Enterprise architecture integration in e-Government. In Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2005.
16. Jacek Kopecky, Tomas Vitvar, Carine Bournez, and Joel Farrell. SAWSDL: Semantic Annotations for WSDL and XML Schema. IEEE Internet Computing, 11(6):60-67, 2007.
17. J. Langford and J. Roy. E-government and public private partnerships in canada when failure is not an option. International journal Of Electronic Business, 4, 2006.
18. M.S. Laskowaski. The impact of electronic access to government information: What users and document specialists think. Journal of Government Information, 27, 2000.
19. K. Layne and J. Lee. Developing fully functional e-government: A four-stage model. Government Information Quarterly, 18:122-136, 2001.
20. Commission of the European Communities. Role of e-government for europes future. Technical report, European Union, 2003.
21. Modinis Project Partners. Breaking Barriers to eGovernment. www.egovbarriers.org/, 2007.
22. PCIP. Pacific council working group report. http://www.pacificcouncil. org.
23. A. Salminen. Building Digital Government by XML. In Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on System Sciences, page 122b, 2005.
24. H. Jochen Scholl. E-Government: A special case of ICT-enabled business process change. In 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS36), Waikoloa, HI, 2003.
25. H.J. Scholl. Electronic government: Information management capacity, organizational capabilities, and sourcing mix. Government Information Quarterly, 23, 2006.
26. UK Cabinet Office. British Standard Address Specification, BS7666. http://www.govtalk.gov.uk/.
27. UK National Audit Office. Child Support Agency-Implementation of the Child Support Reforms, 2006.
28. UK National Audit Office. The National Programme for IT in the NHS: Progress since 2006, 2008.
29. W3C. Simple knowledge organization system. http://www.w3.org/2004/02/ skos/.
30. M. Wimmer and E. Tambouris. Online one-stop government. In Information Systems: The e-Business Challenge, pages 117-130, 2002.
31. Maria Wimmer, Cristiano Codagnone, and Marijn Janssen. Future e-Government research: 13 research themes identified in the eGovRTD2020 project. In Proceedings of the 41st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2008.