Modeling collaborative behavior: Foundations for collaboration technologies

Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages

  Poltrock, Steven ^a   Handel, Mark ^a  

^a BOEING COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHANGE MANAGEMENT PROCESS; COLLABORATION CAPABILITIES; COLLABORATION TECHNOLOGIES; COLLABORATIVE BEHAVIORS; COLLABORATIVE TECHNOLOGIES; COMPLEX SYSTEMS; REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS; USE MODELS;

LARGE SCALE SYSTEMS;

TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 63349101995     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2009.310     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Bahrami, A., Object Oriented Systems Development: Using the Unified Modeling Language. McGraw Hill College, New York, 1999.
2. th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. Vancouver, 2003, 11-20.
3. Briggs, R.O., Adkins, M., Mittleman, D., Kruse, J., Miller, S. and Nunamaker, J.F. A technology transition model derived from field investigation of GSS use aboard the U.S.S. Coronado. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15, 1998, 151-196.
4. th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, 2001.
5. Card, S.K., Moran, T.P., and Newell, A. The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1983.
6. Colombetti, M. & Verdicchio M. An analysis of agent speech acts as institutional actions. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Bologna, Italy, 2002, 1157-1164.
7. Cross, R., Parker, A. The Hidden Power of Social Networks: Understanding How Work Really Gets Done in Organizations. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, 2004.
8. Davis, F.D. User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38, 1993, 475-487.
9. Feldman, M.S.. and Pentland, B.T. Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 2003, 94-118.
10. Fisher, D., Dourish, P. Social and Temporal Structures in Everyday Collaboration. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. Vienna, 2005, 551-558.
11. Glaser, B.G. Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussions. Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA, 1998.
12. Glaser, B.G., and Strauss, A.L. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitiative research. Aldine, Chicago, 1967.
13. Grudin, J. Obstacles to participatory design in large product development organizations. In D. Schuler & A. Namioka (Eds.), Participatory Design: Principles and Practices, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1993, pp. 92-122.
14. Hudson, J, Christensen, J. Kellogg, W., Erickson, T. "I'd be overwhelmed, but it's just one more thing to do": Availability and Interruption in Research Management. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. Minneapolis, 2002, 97-104.
15. Hutchins, E. Cognition in the Wild. Bradford Books, Boston, 1995.
16. Hutchins, E., Holder, B.E. and Perez, R.A. Culture and Flight Deck Operations. Prepared for The Boeing Company, University of California, 2002.
17. Hutchins, E. and Klausen, T. Distributed cognition in an airplane cockpit. In Y. Engeström and D. Middleton (Eds.) Cognition and Communication at Work. New York: Cambridge University Press. 1996, 15-34.
18. Jones, H. and Hinds, P. Extreme work teams: Using SWAT teams as a model for coordinating distributed robots. ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW 2002), New Orleans, November 2002, 372-381.
19. Kieras, D.E. and Santoro, T.P. Computational GOMS modeling of a complex team task: Lessons learned. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2004), Vienna, Austria, 2004, 97-104.
20. Klein, M. and Petti, C. A handbook-based methodology for redesigning business processes. Knowledge and Process Management, 13, 2006, 108-119
21. Malone, T, K. Crowston, K. and Herman G. (eds). Organizing Business Knowledge: The MIT Process Handbook. MIT Press, Boston, 2003.
22. Orlikowski, W.J. Case tools as organizational change: Investigating incremental and radical changes in system development. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 17, 3, 1993, 309-340.
23. Poltrock, S., Handel, M. and Klein, M. Understanding process differences: Agreeing upon a single way to skin a cat. Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Knowledge Systems for Coalition Operations (KSCO 2007), Waltham, MA, May, 2007.
24. Schoop, M. An introduction to the language-action perspective. ACM SIGGROUP Bulletin, 22, 2, 2001, 3-8.
25. Schuler, D. and Namioka, A. Participatory Design: Principles and Practices, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1993.
26. Sonnenwald, D.H., and Pierce, L. Information behavior in dynamic group work contexts: Interwoven situational awareness, dense social networks, and contested collaboration in command and control. Information Processing & Management, 36, 3, 2000, 461-479.
27. Suchman, L.A. Office procedures as practical action: Models of work and system design. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 1, 4 (Oct. 1983), 320-328.
28. Suchman, L.A. Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication, Cambridge University Press, 1987.
29. Suchman, L. (1993). Technologies of Accountability: On Lizards and Aeroplanes. In G .Button (ed.) Technology and the Working Order. Routledge, London, 113-126.
30. Suchman, L. Do categories have politics? The Language/Action perspective reconsidered. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 2, 3, 1994, 177-190.
31. Suchman, L.A. and Wynn, E. Procedures and problems in the office. Office: Technology and People, 2, 1984, 133-154.
32. Winograd, T. A language/action perspective on the design of cooperative work. In I Greif (Ed.), Computer-Supported Cooperative Work: A Book of Readings, Morgan-Kaufman, San Mateo, 1988, 623-653.