Issues related to development of E/E product line architectures in heavy vehicles

Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages

  Wallin, Peter ^a   Johnsson, Stefan ^a   Axelsson, Jakob ^b  

^a MÄLARDALEN UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b VOLVO CAR CORPORATION   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMOBILE ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT; AUTOMOBILE PARTS AND EQUIPMENT; AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY; ELECTRONICS INDUSTRY;

ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC PRODUCTS; HEAVY VEHICLES; IN VEHICLES; PRODUCT LINE ARCHITECTURES; REAL-WORLD; SOFTWARE INTENSIVE SYSTEMS;

VEHICLES;

EID: 63349083980     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2009.276     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. ISO/IEC 9126-1:2001, Software engineering - Product quality.
2. IEEE 1471-2000, Recommended Practice for Architectural Description of Software-Intensive Systems. 2000.
3. J. Axelsson. Cost models with explicit uncertainties for elextronic architecture trade-off and risk analysis. In INCOSE 2006 Annual International Symposium on Systems Engineering, Orlando, USA, July 2006.
4. A. Birk, G. Heller, I. John, K. Schmid, T. von der Massen, and K. Muller. Product line engineering, the state of the practice. IEEE Software, 20(6):52-60, Nov.-Dec. 2003.
5. st International Conference on Software Engineering, Los Angeles, USA, pages 544-554, 1999.
6. M. E. Conway. How do committees invent? Datamation, april 1968.
7. J. M. Favaro, K. R. Favaro, and P. F. Favaro. Value based software reuse investment. Annals of Software Engineering, 5(1):5-52, January 1998.
8. T. Gorschek and C. Wohlin. Identification of improvement issues using a lightweight triangulation approach. European software process improvement conference (EuroSPI'2003), Verlag der Technischen Universität, Graz, Austria, pages VI.1-VI.14, 2003.
9. B. Graaf, M. Lormans, and H. Toetenel. Embedded software engineering: the state of the practice. IEEE Software, 20(6):61-69, Nov.-Dec. 2003.
10. M. Griss. Software reuse architecture, process, and organization for business success. Computer Systems and Software Engineering, 1997., Proceedings of the Eighth Israeli Conference on, pages 86-89, Jun 1997.
11. J. C. Henderson and N. Venkatraman. Strategic alignment: leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Syst. J., 38(2-3):472-484, 1999.
12. A. R. Hevner, R. W. Collins, and M. J. Garfield. Product and project challenges in electronic commerce software development. SIGMIS Database, 33(4):10-22, 2002.
13. R. S. Kaplan and D. P. Norton. Using the balanced score-card as a strategic management system. Harward Business Review, Jan-Feb 1996.
14. R. Kazman, J. Asundi, and M. Klein. Making architecture design decisions: An economic approach. Technical report, Carnegie Mellon Software Engineering Institute, CMU/SEI-2002-TR-035.
15. R. Kazman, M. Klein, and P. Clements. ATAM: Method for architecture evaluation. Technical report, Carnegie Mellon Software Engineering Institute, CMU/SEI-2000-TR-004.
16. O. Larses. Architecting and modeling of automotive embedded systems. PhD thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, 2005.
17. S. Larsson, A. Wall, and P. Wallin. Assessing the influence on processes when evolving the software architecture. In IWPSE '07: Ninth international workshop on Principles of software evolution, pages 59-66, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM.
18. G. Leen and D. Heffernan. Expanding automotive electronic system. In IEEE Computer, volume 35, pages 88-93, 2002.
19. F. Losavio, L. Chirinos, A. Matteo, N. Laevy, and A. Ramdane-Cherif. Iso quality standards for measuring architectures. The Journal of Systems and Software, 72(2):209-223, 2004.
20. G. Mustapic, A. Wall, C. Norström, I. Crnkovic, K. Sandström, J. Fröberg, and J. Andersson. Real world influences on software architecture - interviews with industrial experts. In IEEE, editor, IEEE Working Conferance on Software Architectures, Oslo, Norway. IEEE, June 2004.
21. C. Robson. Real World Research. Blackwell publishing, second edition, 2002.
22. C. J. Russell and P. Bobko. Moderated regression analysis and likert scales too coarse for comfort. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(3):336-342, June 1992.
23. K. Sengupta, T. K. Abdel-Hamid, and L. N. V. Wassenhove. The experience trap. Harward Business Review, 86(2):94-101, February 2008.
24. D. Steward. The design structure matrix: A method for managing the design of complex systems. IEEE transactions on engineering management, 28(3), 1981.
25. A. Sudjianto and K. Otto. Modularization to support multiple brand platforms. In Proceedings of DETC: ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Pittsburgh, USA, September 2001.
26. S. Thomke and T. Fujimoto. The effect of 'front-loading' problem-solving on product development performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 17(2):128-142, March 2000.
27. D. Tjosvold. Cooperative and Competitive Interdependence: Collaboration Between Departments To Serve Customers. Group Organization Management, 13(3):274-289, 1988.
28. F. van der Linden, J. Bosch, E. Kamsties, K. Känsälä, and H. Obbink. Software product family evaluation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3154:110-129, 2004.
29. P. Wallin and J. Axelsson. A Case Study of Issues Related to Automotive E/E System Architecture Development. In Proceedings of 15th IEEE International Conference on Computer Based Systems, pages 87-95, Belfast, Northern Ireland, March 2008.
30. C. Wohlin, P. Runeson, M. Höst, M. Ohlsson, B. Regnell, and A. Wesslén. Experimentation in Software Engineering: An Introduction. Springer, 2000.
31. R. K. Yin. Case Study Research, Design and Methods. SAGE Publications, Thousands Oak, California, 1986.