Ownership of medical information

JAMA

Volumn 301, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 1282-1284

  Hall, Mark A ^a   Schulman, Kevin A ^a  

^a WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LEGAL ASPECT; MEDICAL INFORMATION; NOTE; PATIENT RIGHT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRIVACY; ARTICLE; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; MEDICAL RECORD; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; UNITED STATES;

FINANCING, GOVERNMENT; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; OWNERSHIP; UNITED STATES;

EID: 63349083742     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: 15383598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2009.389     Document Type: Note

References (15)

1. Herszenhorn DM. A smaller, faster stimulus plan, but still with a lot of money. New York Times. February 14, 2009:A11.
2. Stearns PV. Access to and cost of reproduction of patient medical records: a comparison of state laws. J Leg Med. 2000;21(1):79-108.
3. Waller AA, Alcantara OL. Ownership of health information in the information age. J AHIMA. 1998;69(3):28-38.
4. Safran C, Bloomrosen M, Hammond WE, et al; Expert Panel. Toward a national framework for the secondary use of health data: an American Medical Informatics Association White Paper. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;14(1):1-8.
5. Bloomrosen M, Detmer D. Advancing the framework: use of health data-a report of a working conference of the American Medical Informatics Association. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008;15(6):715-722.
6. Hall MA, Schulman KA. Property, privacy and the pursuit of integrated electronic medical records. In: Elhauge E, ed. Our Fragmented Health Care System: Causes and Solutions. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. In press.
7. Suter SM. Disentangling privacy from property: toward a deeper understanding of genetic privacy. George Washington Law Rev. 2004;72(4):737-814.
8. Smith HE. Intellectual property as property: delineating entitlements in information. Yale Law J. 2007;116(8):1742-1822.
9. Haislmaier EF. Health care information technology: getting the policy right. Heritage Foundation WebMemo #1131. June 16, 2006. http://www.heritage. org/Research/HealthCare/wm1131.cfm. Accessed February 23, 2009.
10. Heller MA, Eisenberg R. Can patents deter innovation? the anticommons in biomedical research. Science. 1998;280(5364):698-701.
11. Congressional Budget Office. Evidence on the costs and benefits of health information technology. May 2008. https://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/91xx/doc9168/05- 20-HealthlT.pdf. Accessed February 23, 2009.
12. PCHRI. The Harvard Medical School meeting on personally controlled health record infrastructure, http://www.pchri.org/2006/presentations/pchri2006-track- output.pdf. 2006. Accessed February 23, 2009.
13. Hoffman S, Podgurski A. In sickness, health, and cyberspace: protecting the security of electronic private health information. Boston College Law Rev. 2007; 48(2):331-386.
14. Fried BM. Gauging the progress of the National Health Information Technology Initiative: perspectives from the field, http://www.chcf.org/topics/ view.cfm ?itemid=133553. Updated January 2008. Accessed February 23, 2009.
15. Altarum. Review of personal health record (PHR) service provider market: privacy and security: January 5, 2007. http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic/ materials/01-07/ce/PrivacyReview.pdf. Accessed February 23, 2009.