Feshbach resonance in d -wave collisions

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 79, Issue 3, 2009, Pages

  Beaufils, Q ^a   Crubellier, A ^b   Zanon, T ^a   Laburthe Tolra, B ^a   Marechal E ^a   Vernac, L ^a   Gorceix, O ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS 13   (France)

^b CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATOMS; CHROMIUM; DIPOLE MOMENT; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD EFFECTS; MAGNETIC FIELDS;

ADJUSTABLE PARAMETERS; BOUND STATE; COLLISION CHANNELS; COUPLING PARAMETERS; DIPOLE-DIPOLE INTERACTIONS; EXPERIMENTAL DATUM; FESHBACH RESONANCES; LINE SHAPES; LOSS RATES; MOLECULAR STATE; ULTRA COLDS; WAVE COLLISIONS;

RESONANCE;

EID: 63249106281     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: 10941622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.79.032706     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. M. Gustavsson, E. Haller, M. J. Mark, J. G. Danzl, G. Rojas-Kopeinig, and H. C. Nagerl, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 080404 (2008) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100. 080404
2. M. Fattori, C. D'Errico, G. Roati, M. Zaccanti, M. Jona-Lasinio, M. Modugno, M. Inguscio, and G. Modugno, Phys. Rev. Lett., 100, 080405 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.080405
3. T. Kohler, K. Goral, and P. Julienne, Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 1311 (2006). 10.1103/RevModPhys.78.1311
4. I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and W. Zwerger, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 885 (2008). 10.1103/RevModPhys.80.885
5. C. A. Regal, C. Ticknor, J. L. Bohn, and D. S. Jin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 053201 (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.053201
6. C. Buggle, J. Léonard, W. von Klitzing, and J. T. M. Walraven, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 173202 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.173202
7. A. Griesmaier, J. Werner, S. Hensler, J. Stuhler, and T. Pfau, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 160401 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.160401
8. Q. Beaufils, R. Chicireanu, T. Zanon, B. Laburthe-Tolra, E. Marechal, L. Vernac, J. C. Keller, and O. Gorceix, Phys. Rev. A 77, 061601 (R) (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevA.77.061601
9. J. Werner, A. Griesmaier, S. Hensler, J. Stuhler, T. Pfau, A. Simoni, and E. Tiesinga, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 183201 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.183201
10. Q. Beaufils, R. Chicireanu, A. Pouderous, W. de Souza Melo, B. Laburthe-Tolra, E. Marechal, L. Vernac, J. C. Keller, and O. Gorceix, Phys. Rev. A 77, 053413 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevA.77.053413
11. This is also in agreement with our estimate of the loss rate due to evaporation, which we find to be always much smaller than the measured loss rate.
12. F. H. Mies, E. Tiesinga, and P. S. Julienne, Phys. Rev. A 61, 022721 (2000). 10.1103/PhysRevA.61.022721
13. V. A. Yurovsky and A. Ben-Reuven, Phys. Rev. A 67, 050701 (R) (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevA.67.050701
14. R. Napolitano, J. Weiner, C. J. Williams, and P. S. Julienne, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 1352 (1994). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.1352
15. P. S. Julienne and F. H. Mies, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 6, 2257 (1989). 10.1364/JOSAB.6.002257
16. We thank W. D. Phillips for pointing out this physical interpretation to us.
17. J. Stuhler, A. Griesmaier, J. Werner, T. Koch, M. Fattori, and T. Pfau, J. Mod. Opt. 54, 647 (2007). 10.1080/09500340600677088
18. A. Crubellier, O. Dulieu, F. Masnou-Seeuws, M. Elbs, H. Knöckel, and E. Tiemann, Eur. Phys. J. D 6, 211 (1999). 10.1007/s100530050303
19. N. Vanhaecke, Ch. Lisdat, B. T'Jampens, D. Comparat, A. Crubellier, P. Pillet, Eur. Phys. J. D 28, 351 (2004). 10.1140/epjd/e2004-00001-y
20. A. Crubellier and E. Luc-Koenig, J. Phys. B 39, 1417 (2006). 10.1088/0953-4075/39/6/013
21. Q. Beaufils, A. Crubellier, T. Zanon, B. Laburthe-Tolra, E. Marechal, L. Vernac, and O. Gorceix, e-print arXiv:0812.4355.
22. M. Grupp, R. Walser, and W. P. Schleich, J. Phys. B 40, 2703 (2007). 10.1088/0953-4075/40/13/014