A kinematic approach to the conceptual representations of this and that

Cognition

Volumn 111, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 270-274

  Bonfiglioli, Claudia ^a   Finocchiaro, Chiara ^a   Gesierich, Benno ^a   Rositani, Francesco ^a   Vescovi, Massimo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRENTO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Kinematic analysis; Movement planning; Near and far space; Spatial demonstratives

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONCEPT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KINEMATICS; LINGUISTICS; MALE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); MOVEMENT PLANNING; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; WORD RECOGNITION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; BIOMECHANICS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MALE; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 63149190204     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.01.006     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Alonso F.J., Del Castello J.M., and Pintado P. Application of singular spectrum analysis to the smoothing of raw kinematic signals. Journal of Biomechanics 38 (2005) 1085-1092
2. Calabrese, A. (2001). I dimostrativi: Pronomi e aggettivi. In Renzi, L., Salvi, G., & Cardinaletti, A. (Eds.). Grande grammatica Italiana di consultazione (Vol. I, pp. 631-645). Bologna: Il Mulino.
3. Coventry K.R., Valdés B., Castillo A., and Guijarro-Fuentes P. Language within your reach: Near-far perceptual space and spatial demonstratives. Cognition 108 (2008) 889-895
4. Gentilucci M., Benuzzi F., Bertolani L., Daprati E., and Gangitano M. Language and motor control. Experimental Brain Research 133 (2000) 468-490
5. Gentilucci M., Castiello U., Corradini M.L., Scarpa M., Umiltà C., and Rizzolatti G. Influence of different types of grasping on the transport component of prehension movements. Neuropsychologia 5 (1991) 361-378
6. Gentilucci M., and Gangitano M. Influence of automatic word reading on motor control. European Journal of Neuroscience 10 (1998) 752-756
7. Glover S. Visual illusions affect planning but not control. Trends Cognitive Science 6 (2002) 288-292
8. Glover S. Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2004) 3-78
9. Glover S., and Dixon P. Semantics affect the planning but not control of grasping. Experimental Brain Research 146 (2002) 383-387
10. Glover S., Rosenbaum D.A., Graham J., and Dixon P. Grasping the meaning of words. Experimental Brain Research 154 (2004) 103-108
11. Kemmerer D. ''Near'' and ''far'' in language and perception. Cognition 73 (1999) 35-63
12. Kemmerer D. The semantics of space: Integrating linguistic typology and cognitive neuroscience. Neuropsychologia 44 (2006) 1607-1621
13. Schneider W., Eschmann A., and Zuccolotto A. E-Prime reference guide (2002), Psychology Software Tools, Pittsburgh, PA