Follow-up assessment of excluded oocyte donor candidates

Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 320-325

  Zweifel, Julianne E ^a   Biaggio, Brittany ^a   Schouweiler, Calissa ^b   Lindheim, Steven R ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b WHITMAN COLLEGE   (United States)

^c Fertility Specialists Medical Group   (United States)

Author keywords

Excluded; Oocyte donor; Rejection; Selection

Indexed keywords

ANGER; ARTICLE; EMOTION; FEAR; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FRUSTRATION; HUMAN; MEDICAL ETHICS; OOCYTE DONATION; POWERLESSNESS; SUICIDAL IDEATION;

ADULT; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; OOCYTE DONATION; TISSUE DONORS;

EID: 63149139697     PISSN: 13418076     EISSN: 14470756     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2008.00942.x     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2005 Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Report: Section 4 - ART cycles using donor eggs. Atlanta : 2007.
2. Khamsi F, Endman MW, Lacanna IC, Wong J. Some psychological aspects of oocyte donation from known donors on altruistic basis. Fertil Steril 1997 68 : 323 327.
3. Partrick M, Smith AL, Meyer WR, Bashford RA. Anonymous oocyte donation: A follow-up questionnaire. Fertil Steril 2001 75 : 1034 1036.
4. Weiss KA, Mangieri R, Josephs LS, Cholst IN. Outcome of a cohort of anonymous oocytes donor applicants and predictors of voluntary withdrawal. Fertil Steril 2001 76 : S25.
5. Kalfoglou AL, Geller G. A follow-up study with oocyte donors exploring their experiences, knowledge, and attitudes about the use of their oocytes and the outcome of the donation. Fertil Steril 2000 74 : 660 667.
6. Cooper S, Glazer ES. Choosing Assisted Reproduction: Social, Emotional & Ethical Considerations. Indianapolis, IN : Perspective Press 1998.
7. Fielding D, Handley S, Duqueno L, Weaver S, Lui S. Motivation, attitudes and experience of donation: A follow-up of women donating eggs in assisted conception treatment. J Community Appl Soc Psychol 1998 8 : 273 287.
8. Kalfoglou AL, Gittelsohn J. A qualitative follow-up study of women's experiences with oocyte donation. Hum Reprod 2000 15 : 798 805.
9. Schover LR, Collins RL, Quigley MM, Blankstein J, Kanoti G. Psychological follow-up of women evaluated as oocyte donors. Hum Reprod 1991 6 : 1487 1491.
10. Soderstrom-Anttila V. Follow-up study of Finnish volunteer oocyte donors concerning their attitudes to oocyte donation. Hum Reprod 1995 10 : 3073 3076.
11. Kump LJV, Baek K, Lee S, Shiffman M, Licciardi F. Extensive screening of oocyte donors is nonetheless a worthwhile process. Fertil Steril 2002 78 : S11.
12. Johnson LK, Burry KA, Patton PE, Acker PA, Gorrill MJ. Oocyte donor screening: The selection process. Fertil Steril 2000 73 (Suppl S10.
13. Guidelines for oocyte donation (Editorial). Fertil Steril 2002 77 (6 Suppl 5 S6 S8.
14. Lindheim SR, Frumovitz M, Sauer MV. Recruitment and screening policies and procedures used to establish a paid donor oocyte registry. Hum Reprod 1998 13 : 2020 2024.
15. Sauer MV, Ary BR, Paulson RJ. The demographic characterization of women participating in oocyte donation: A review of 300 consecutively performed cycles. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1994 45 : 147 151.
16. Klock SC, Elman-Stout J, Davidson M. Psychological characteristics and factors related to willingness to donate again among anonymous oocyte donors. Fertil Steril 2003 79 : 1312 1316.
17. Tracking change: The feasibility of a voluntary gamete donor registry in the United States (Conference). 2008. Retrieved March 28, 2008 from http://www.law.depaul.edu/centers-institutes/health-law/tracking-change.asp
18. Craft I. Will removal of anonymity influence the recruitment of egg donors? A survey of past donors and recipients. RBM Online 2005 10 : 325 329.
19. Purewal S, van den Akker OBA. British women's attitudes towards oocyte donation: Ethnic differences and altruism. Patient Educ Couns 2006 64 : 43 49.
20. Yee S, Hitkari JA, Greenblatt EM. A follow-up study of women who donated oocytes to known recipient couples for altruistic reasons. Hum Reprod 2007 22 : 2040 2050.
21. Murray C, Golombok S. Oocyte and semen donation: A survey of UK licensed centres. Hum Reprod 2000 15 : 2133 2139.