Recruitment and screening policies and procedures used to establish a paid donor oocyte registry

Human Reproduction

Volumn 13, Issue 7, 1998, Pages 2020-2024

  Lindheim, Steven R ^a   Frumovitz, Michael ^a   Sauer, Mark V ^a,b  

^a Center for Human Reproduction ^*  (United States)

^b New York Presbyterian Hospital Columbia University Medical Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Donor registry; Oocyte donation; Pathology; Screening

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COUNSELING; DEMOGRAPHY; EDUCATION; FEMALE; GENETIC SCREENING; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MARRIAGE; MEDICAL PSYCHOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; OCCUPATION; OOCYTE DONATION; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; REGISTER; SCREENING; SCREENING TEST;

EID: 0031856296     PISSN: 02681161     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/13.7.2020     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Abdalla, H.I., Wren, M.E., Thomas, A. and Korea, L. (1997) Age of the uterus does not affect pregnancy or implantation rates; a study of egg donation in women of different ages sharing oocytes from the same donor. Hum. Reprod., 12, 827-829.
2. Assisted Reproductive Technology in the United States and Canada (1996) 1994 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry. Fertil. Steril., 66, 697-705.
3. Buttram, V.C. and Reiter, R.C. (1981) Uterine leiomyomata: etiology, symptomatology, and management. Fertil. Steril., 36, 433-445.
4. Carmina, E., Wong, L., Chang, L. et al. (1997) Endocrine abnormalities in ovulatory women with polycystic appearing ovaries. Hum. Reprod., 12, 905-909.
5. Check, J.H., Askari, A.H., Fisher, C. and Vanaman, L. (1994) The use of a shared donor oocyte program to evaluate the effect of uterine senescence. Fertil Steril, 61, 252-255.
6. Ethical considerations of the assisted reproductive technologies (1994) Guidelines for oocyte donation. Fertil. Steril. (Suppl.), 1, 1055-1075.
7. Frydman, R., Letur-Korirsch, H. and de Ziegler, D. (1990) A protocol for satisfying the ethical issues raised by oocyte donation: the free, anonymous, and fertile donors. Fertil. Steril., 53, 666-672.
8. Greenfeld, D.A., Mazure, C.M., Olive, D.L. and Keefe, D.L. (1995) Similarities and differences between anonymous and directed candidates for oocyte donation. Clin. Assist. Reprod., 12, 118-122.
9. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (1993) Code of Practice. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, London.
10. Loi relative au don et a l'utilisation des elements et produits du corps humain, a l'assistance medicale a la procreation et au diagnostic prenatal, July 1994, Art L665-13.
11. Sauer, M.V. (1997) Exploitation or a woman's right? Br. Med. J., 314, 1403.
12. Sauer, M.V., Ary, B.R. and Paulson, R.J. (1994) The demographic characterization of women participating in oocyte donation: a review of 300 consecutively performed cycles. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet., 45, 147-151.
13. Strassmann, E.O. (1966) Fertility and unification of double uterus. Fertil. Steril., 17, 165-176.
14. Wallach, E.E. (1992) Myomectomy. In Thompson, J.D. and Rock, J.A. (eds), Telindes's Operative Gynecology, J.B. Lippincott, Philadelphia, 1992, pp. 647-662.