Finite-fault analysis of the 2004 Parkfield, California, earthquake using Pnl waveforms

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America

Volumn 98, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 2746-2755

  Mendoza, C ^a   Hartzell, S ^b  

^a CENTRO DE GEOCIENCIAS   (Mexico)

^b DENVER FEDERAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CAPILLARY FLOW; DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS; EARTHQUAKES; VELOCITY;

CALIFORNIA; COSEISMIC SLIPS; CRUSTAL STRUCTURES; DATA TYPES; EMPIRICAL GREEN'S FUNCTIONS; FAULT ANALYSIS; FIRST ORDERS; INVERSION PROCEDURES; INVERSION SCHEMES; ONE-DIMENSIONAL; PASSBAND FILTERS; RISE TIME; RUPTURE VELOCITIES; SEISMIC MOMENTS; SLIP MODELS; SOURCE MODELS; VELOCITY MODELS; WAVE FORMS; WAVEFORM INVERSIONS;

GREEN'S FUNCTION;

AFTERSHOCK; COSEISMIC PROCESS; CRUSTAL STRUCTURE; DISPLACEMENT; EARTHQUAKE HYPOCENTER; EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE; EARTHQUAKE RUPTURE; FAULT; GREEN FUNCTION; ONE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING; P-WAVE; PARKFIELD EARTHQUAKE 2004; SEISMIC DATA; SEISMIC MOMENT; SEISMIC SOURCE; SEISMIC VELOCITY; WAVEFORM ANALYSIS;

EID: 63149103189     PISSN: 00371106     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1785/0120080111     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bakun, W. H., and A. G. Lindh (1985). The Parkfield, California earthquake prediction experiment, Science 229, 619-624.
2. Bakun, W. H., B. Aagaard, B. Dost, W. L. Ellsworth, J. L. Hardebeck, R. A. Harris, C. Ji, M. J. S. Johnston, J. Langbein, J. J. Lienkaemper, A. J. Michael, J. R. Murray, R. M. Nadeau, P. A. Reasenberg, M. S. Reichle, E. A. Roeloffs, A. Shakal, R. W. Simpson, and F. Waldhauser (2005). Implications for prediction and hazard assessment from the 2004 Parkfield earthquake, Nature 437, no. 13, 969-974, doi 10.1038/nature04067.
3. w 6.0 Parkfield, California, earthquake: inversion of near-source ground motion using multiple data sets, Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L23312, doi 10.1029/2005GL024417.
4. Goldstein, P., D. Dodge, M. Firpo, and L. Minner (2003). SAC2000: signal processing and analysis tools for seismologists and engineers, invited contribution to The IASPEI International Handbook of Earthquake and Engineering Seismology, W. H. K. Lee, H. Kanamori, P. C. Jennings and C. Kisslinger (Editors), Academic Press, London.
5. Hartzell, S. (1989). Comparison of seismic waveform inversion results for the rupture history of a finite fault: application to the 1986 North Palm Springs, California, earthquake, J. Geophys. Res. 94, 7515-7534.
6. Hartzell, S. H., and T. H. Heaton (1983). Inversion of strong ground motion and teleseismic waveform data for the fault rupture history of the 1979 Imperial Valley, California, earthquake, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 73, 1553-1583.
7. Hartzell, S., P. Liu, C. Mendoza, C. Ji, and K. M. Larson (2007). Stability and uncertainty of finite-fault slip inversions: application to the 2004 Parkfield, California, earthquake, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 97, 1911-1934, doi 10.1785/0120070080.
8. Helmberger, D. V., and G. R. Engen (1980). Modeling the long-period body waves from shallow earthquakes at regional ranges, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 70, 1699-1714.
9. Jeffreys, H., and K. E. Bullen (1940). Seismological Tables, British Association for the Advancement of Science, Gray Milne Trust, London.
10. Johanson, I. A., E. J. Fielding, F. Rolandone, and R. Burgmann (2006). Coseismic and postseismic slip of the 2004 Parkfield earthquake from space-geodetic data, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 96, S269-S282, doi 10.1785/0120050818.
11. w 7.1 Hector Mine, California, earthquake, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 92, 1266-1280.
12. Langbein, J., J. R. Murray, and H. A. Snyder (2006). Coseismic and initial postseismic deformation from the 2004 Parkfield, California, earthquake observed by Global Postioning System, electronic distance meter, creepmeters, and borehole strainmeters, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 96, S304-S320, doi 10.1785/0120050823.
13. Langbein, J., R. Borcherdt, D. Dreger, J. Fletcher, J. L. Hardebeck, M. Hellweg, C. Ji, M. Johnston, J. R. Murray, R. Nadeau, M. J. Rymer, and J. A. Treiman (2005). Preliminary report on the 28 September 2004 M 6.0 Parkfield, California, earthquake, Seism. Res. Lett. 76, 10-26.
14. Liu, P., S. Custodio, and R. J. Archuleta (2006). Kinematic inversion of the 2004 M 6.0 Parkfield earthquake including an approximation to site effects, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 96, S143-S148, doi 10.1785/0120050826.
15. Mendoza, C. (1996). Rapid derivation of rupture history for large earthquakes, Seism. Res. Lett. 67, 19-26.
16. Murray, J., and J. Langbein (2006). Slip on the San Andreas Fault at Parkfield, California, over two earthquake cycles and the implications for seismic hazard, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 96, S288-S303, doi 10.1785/0120050820.
17. Oppenheimer, D., F. Klein, J. Eaton, and F. Lester (1993). The Northern California Seismic Network bulletin, January-December 1992, U.S. Geol. Surv. Open-File Rept. 93-578, 18 pp.
18. Roeloffs, E., and J. Langbein (1994). The earthquake prediction experiment at Parkfield, California, Rev. Geophys. 32, 315-336.
19. Somerville, P., K. Irikura, R. Graves, S. Sawada, D. Wald, N. Abrahamson, Y. Iwasaki, T. Kagawa, N. Smith, and A. Kowada (1999). Characterizing crustal earthquake slip models for the prediction of strong ground motion, Seism. Res. Lett. 70, 59-80.
20. Thurber, C., H. Zhang, F. Waldhauser, J. Hardebeck, A. Michael, and D. Eberhart-Phillips (2006). Three-dimensional compressional wave-speed model, earthquake relocations, and focal mechanisms for the Parkfield, California, region, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 96, S38-S49, doi 10.1785/0120050825.
21. Wallace, T. C., D. V. Helmberger, and G. R. Mellman (1981). A technique for the inversion of regional data in source parameter studies, J. Geophys. Res. 86, 1679-1685.
22. Wessel, P., and W. H. F. Smith (1998). New improved version of the Generic Mapping Tools released, Eos Trans. AGU 79, 579.
23. Zhu, L., and L. A. Rivera (2002). A note on the dynamic and static displacements from a point source in multilayered media, Geophys. J. Int. 148, 619-627.