Paying clinicians to join clinical trials: A review of guidelines and interview study of trialists

Trials

Volumn 10, Issue , 2009, Pages

  Raftery, James ^a   Kerr, Christine ^a   Hawker, Sheila ^a   Powell, John ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; MEDICAL FEE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MOTIVATION; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; PHYSICIAN; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUALITY CONTROL; REIMBURSEMENT; REVIEW; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; UNITED KINGDOM; ALTRUISM; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; ECONOMICS; ETHICS; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MEDICAL ETHICS; PATIENT SELECTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PUBLIC HEALTH;

ALTRUISM; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; ETHICS, CLINICAL; FINANCING, GOVERNMENT; GREAT BRITAIN; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MOTIVATION; NATIONAL HEALTH PROGRAMS; PATIENT SELECTION; PHYSICIANS; RESEARCH SUPPORT AS TOPIC;

EID: 63049111181     PISSN: 17456215     EISSN: 17456215     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-10-15     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. Prescott RJ Counsell CE Gillespie WJ Grant AM Russell IT Kiauka S et al Factors that limit the quality, number and progress of randomised controlled trials Health Technology Assessment 1999, 3(20):iIi-139 http://www.ncchta.org/project/htapubs.asp
2. Campbell MK Snowden C Francis D Elbourne D McDonald AM Knight R Enthwistel V Garcia J Roberts I Grant A (the STEPS group) Recruitment to randomised trials: Strategies for trial enrolment and participation study. The STEPS study Health Technology Assessment 2007, 11(48) http://www.ncchta.org/project/htapubs.asp
3. Charlson ME Horwitz RI Applying results of randomised trials to clinical practice: Impact of losses before randomisation British Medical Journal 1984, 289(6454)1281-4 1443545 6437520
4. Jack WJ Chetty U Rodger A Recruitment to a prospective breast conservation trial: Why are so few patients randomised? British Medical Journal 1990, 301:83-5 1663425 2390587
5. Peto V Coulter A Bond A Factors affecting general practitioners' recruitment of patients into a prospective study Fam Pract 1993, 10(2):207-11 10.1093/fampra/10.2.207 8359613
6. Clinical Research Report Pharmaceutical Industry Competitive Task Force Department of Health 2002 http://www.advisorybodies.doh.gov.uk/pictf/ clinicalresearch.htm
7. Fayter D McDaid C Ritchie G Stirk L Eastwood A Systematic Review of Barriers, Modifiers and Benefits Involved in Participation in Cancer Trials Centre for Reviews and Dissemination University of York; York 2006 Report No.: 31
8. Rendell JM Merrit RK Geddes JR Incentives and disincentives to participation by clinicians in randomised controlled trials Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007 2 MR000021 17443636
9. Bryant J Powell J Payment to healthcare professionals for patient recruitment to trials: A systematic review British Medical Journal 2005, 331:1377-1378 1309646 16339248 10.1136/bmj.331.7529.1377
10. Asch S Connor SE Hamilton EG Fox SA Problems in recruiting community based physicians for health services research J Gen Intern Med 2000, 15(8):591-9 1495576 10940152 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.02329.x
11. Raftery J Bryant J Powell H Kerr C Hawker S Payment to healthcare professionals for patient recruitment to trials: Systematic review and qualitative study Health Technology Assessment 2008, 12(10) http://www.ncchta.org/project/htapubs.asp 18405468
12. Current Clincal Trials http://www.controlled-trials.com/
13. Hawker S Kerr C Doing grounded theory Analysing quantitative data in psychology Sage Publications, London Lyons E, Coyle A 2007:87-97
14. Nvivo Qualitataive data analysis software Version 2.0 [computer program] 1999
15. Department of Health National Health Service income generation - Best practice: Revised guidance on income generation in the NHS. London 2006
16. Department of Health Guidance for R&D Managers in NHS Trusts and Clinical Research Departments in the Pharmaceutical Industry. London 2001 http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/ PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4007728
17. Department of Health Governance arrangements for NHS research ethics committees. London 2001 http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/ Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/ DH_4005727
18. General Medical Council Research: The Role and Responsibilities of Doctors. London 2002 http://www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/current/library/ research.asp
19. Association of British Pharmaceutical Industries Code of Practice for the Pharmaceutical Industry. London 2006 http://www.abpi.org.uk/links/ assoc/PMCPA/pmpca_code2006.pdf updated annually
20. Medical Research Council MRC Clinical Trials Series, MRC guidelines for good clinical practice in clinical trials. London 1998 http://www.mrc.ac.uk/Utilities/Documentrecord/index.htm?d=MRC002416
21. British Medical Association British Medical Association - Ethical considerations. London 2006
22. Department of Health Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care, London 2 2005
23. Department of Health Commercial sponsorship- ethical standards for the NHS. London 2000 http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/ Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4005135
24. Department of Health Best research for best health London 2006