Payment to healthcare professionals for patient recruitment to trials: A systematic review

British Medical Journal

Volumn 331, Issue 7529, 2005, Pages 1377-1378

  Bryant, J ^a   Powell, J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL TRIAL; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL PROFESSION; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; ECONOMICS; EMPIRICAL APPROACH; MOTIVATION; PATIENT SELECTION; SALARY AND FRINGE BENEFIT; STATISTICS;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; EMPIRICAL APPROACH;

CLINICAL TRIALS; HEALTH PERSONNEL; HUMANS; MOTIVATION; PATIENT SELECTION; SALARIES AND FRINGE BENEFITS;

EID: 33644688217     PISSN: 09598146     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.331.7529.1377     Document Type: Review

References (5)

1. Halpern SD, Karlawish JHT, Berlin JA. The continuing unethical conduct of underpowered clinical trials. JAMA 2002;288:358-62.
2. Prescott RJ, Counsell CE, Gillespie WJ, et al. Factors that limit the quality, number and progress of randomised controlled trials. Health Technol Assess 1999;3:1-143.
3. De Wit NJ, Quartero AO, Zuithoff AP, Numans ME. Participation and successful patient recruitment in primary care. J Fam Pract 2001;50:976-81.
4. Pearl A, Wright S, Gamble G, Doughty R, Sharpe N. Randomised trials in general practice: a New Zealand experience in recruitment. N Z Med J 2003;116:681-7.
5. Hjorth M, Holmberg E, Rodjer S, Taube A, Westin J. Physicians' attitudes toward clinical trials and their relationship to patient accrual in a Nordic multicenter study on myeloma. Control Clin Trials 1996;17:372-86.