Cardiovascular applications of phase-contrast MRI

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 192, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 662-675

  Srichai, Monvadi B ^a   Lim, Ruth P ^a   Wong, Samson ^a   Lee, Vivian S ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Acquired heart disease; Cardiac imaging; Congenital heart disease; Phase contrast mri; Vascular imaging

Indexed keywords

AMPLITUDE MODULATION; AORTA COARCTATION; AORTA DISSECTION; AORTA VALVE REGURGITATION; ATHEROSCLEROSIS; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; DISEASE SEVERITY; HEART HEMODYNAMICS; HEART OUTPUT; HUMAN; LUNG HYPOPLASIA; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULMONARY ARTERY STENOSIS; PULMONARY VALVE INSUFFICIENCY; REVIEW; TRICUSPID VALVE DISEASE;

CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 63049087863     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.3744     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. Lotz J, Meier C, Leppert A, Galanski M. Cardiovascular flow measurement with phase-contrast MR imaging: basic facts and implementation. Ra-dioGraphics 2002; 22:651-671
2. Pelc NJ. Flow quantification and analysis methods. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 1995; 3: 413-424
3. de Marchi SF, Bodenmuller M, Lai DL, Seiler C. Pulmonary venous flow velocity patterns in 404 individuals without cardiovascular disease. Heart 2001; 85:23-29
4. Ghio S, Recusani F, Sebastiani R, et al. Doppler velocimetry in superior vena cava provides useful information on the right circulatory function in patients with congestive heart failure. Echocar-diography 2001; 18:469-477
5. Mohiaddin RH, Wann SL, Underwood R, Firmin DN, Rees S, Longmore DB. Vena caval flow: assessment with cine MR velocity mapping. Radiology 1990; 177:537-541
6. Lee VS, Spritzer CE, Carroll BA, et al. Flow quantification using fast cine phase-contrast MR imaging, conventional cine phase-contrast MR imaging, and Doppler sonography: in vitro and in vivo validation. AJR 1997; 169:1125-1131
7. Hoskins PR. Accuracy of maximum velocity estimates made using Doppler ultrasound systems. Br J Radiol 1996; 69:172-177
8. Evans AJ, Iwai F, Grist TA, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of blood flow with a phase subtraction technique: in vitro and in vivo validation. Invest Radiol 1993; 28:109-115
9. Rieu R, Pelissier R, Isaaz K. Accuracy of the simplified Bernoulli relationship in measuring pressure gradients across stenosis. Int Angiol 1989;8:210-215
10. Oshinski JN, Parks WJ, Markou CP, et al. Improved measurement of pressure gradients in aortic coarctation by magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 28:1818-1826
11. Steffens JC, Bourne MW, Sakuma H, O'Sullivan M, Higgins CB. Quantification of collateral blood flow in coarctation of the aorta by velocity encoded cine magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 1994; 90:937-943
12. Deanfield J, Thaulow E, Warnes C, et al. Management of grown up congenital heart disease. Eur Heart J 2003; 24:1035-1084
13. Silverman JM, Raissi S, Tyszka JM, Trento A, Herfkens RJ. Phase-contrast cine MR angiography detection of thoracic aortic dissection. Int J Card Imaging 2000; 16:461-470
14. Othersen JB, Maize JC, Woolson RF, Budisav- ljevic MN. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis after exposure to gadolinium in patients with renal failure. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2007; 22:3179-3185
15. Kunz RP, Oberholzer K, Kuroczynski W, et al. Assessment of chronic aortic dissection: contribution of different ECG-gated breath-hold MRI techniques. AJR 2004; 182:1319-1326
16. Varaprasathan GA, Araoz PA, Higgins CB, Red- dy GP. Quantification of flow dynamics in congenital heart disease: applications of velocity-encoded cine MR imaging. RadioGraphics 2002;22:895-905
17. Vanninen RL, Manninen HI, Partanen PL, Vainio PA, Soimakallio S. Carotid artery stenosis: clinical efficacy of MR phase-contrast flow quantification as an adjunct to MR angiography. Radiology 1995; 194:459-467
18. Rutgers DR, Blankensteijn JD, van der Grond J. Preoperative MRA flow quantification in CEA patients: flow differences between patients who develop cerebral ischemia and patients who do not develop cerebral ischemia during cross-clamping of the carotid artery. Stroke 2000; 31:3021-3028
19. Kato T, Indo T, Yoshida E, Iwasaki Y, Sone M, Sobue G. Contrast-enhanced 2D cine phase MR angiography for measurement of basilar artery blood flow in posterior circulation ischemia. Am J Neuroradiol 2002; 23:1346-1351
20. Kondo C, Caputo GR, Semelka R, Foster E, Shi-makawa A, Higgins CB. Right and left ventricular stroke volume measurements with velocity-encoded cine MR imaging: in vitro and in vivo validation. AJR 1991; 157:9-16
21. Firmin DN, Nayler GL, Klipstein RH, Underwood SR, Rees RS, Longmore DB. In vivo validation of MR velocity imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1987; 11:751-756
22. Paulus WJ, Tschope C, Sanderson JE, et al. How to diagnose diastolic heart failure: a consensus statement on the diagnosis of heart failure with normal left ventricular ejection fraction by the Heart Failure and Echocardiography Associations of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2007; 28:2539-2550
23. Paelinck BP, Lamb HJ, Bax JJ, Van der Wall EE, de Roos A. Assessment of diastolic function by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Am Heart J 2002; 144:198-205
24. Paelinck BP, de Roos A, Bax JJ, et al. Feasibility of tissue magnetic resonance imaging: a pilot study in comparison with tissue Doppler imaging and invasive measurement. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45:1109-1116
25. Delfino JG, Bhasin M, Cole R, et al. Comparison of myocardial velocities obtained with magnetic resonance phase velocity mapping and tissue Doppler imaging in normal subjects and patients with left ventricular dyssynchrony. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 24:304-311
26. Westenberg JJ, Lamb HJ, van der Geest RJ, et al. Assessment of left ventricular dyssynchrony in patients with conduction delay and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy: head-to-head comparison between tissue Doppler imaging and velocity-encoded magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47:2042-2048
27. Rebergen SA, Chin JG, Ottenkamp J, van der Wall EE, de Roos A. Pulmonary regurgitation in the late postoperative follow-up of tetralogy of Fallot: volumetric quantitation by nuclear magnetic resonance velocity mapping. Circulation 1993; 88:2257-2266
28. Didier D, Ratib O, Lerch R, Friedli B. Detection and quantification of valvular heart disease with dynamic cardiac MR imaging. RadioGraphics 2000; 20:1279-1299
29. Glockner JF, Johnston DL, McGee KP. Evaluation of cardiac valvular disease with MR imaging: qualitative and quantitative techniques. Radio-Graphics 2003; 23:e9
30. Helbing WA, Niezen RA, Le Cessie S, van der Geest RJ, Ottenkamp J, de Roos A. Right ventricular diastolic function in children with pulmonary regurgitation after repair of tetralogy of Fallot: volumetric evaluation by magnetic resonance velocity mapping. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28:1827-1835
31. Baltes C, Hansen MS, Tsao J, et al. Determination of peak velocity in stenotic areas: echocardiography versus κ-t SENSE accelerated MR Fourier velocity encoding. Radiology 2008; 246:249-257
32. Komoda T, Hetzer R, Uyama C, et al. Mitral annular function assessed by 3D imaging for mitral valve surgery. J Heart Valve Dis 1994; 3:483-490
33. Kayser HW, Stoel BC, van der Wall EE, van der Geest RJ, de Roos A. MR velocity mapping of tricuspid flow: correction for through-plane motion. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997; 7:669-673
34. Westenberg JJ, Doornbos J, Versteegh MI, et al. Accurate quantitation of regurgitant volume with MRI in patients selected for mitral valve repair. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005; 27:462-466
35. Walker PG, Houlind K, Djurhuus C, Kim WY, Pedersen EM. Motion correction for the quantification of mitral regurgitation using the control volume method. Magn Reson Med 2000;43:726-733
36. Hundley WG, Li HF, Willard JE, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of the severity of mitral regurgitation. Comparison with invasive techniques. Circulation 1995; 92:1151-1158