Improved measurement of pressure gradients in aortic coarctation by magnetic resonance imaging

Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Volumn 28, Issue 7, 1997, Pages 1818-1826

  Oshinski, John N ^a   Parks, W James ^b   Markou, Christos P ^a   Bergman, Harris L ^c   Larson, Blake E ^c   Ku, David N ^c   Mukundan, Srinivasan ^a   Pettigrew, Roderic I ^a  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Children's Healthcare of Atlanta at Egleston   (United States)

^c GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AORTA COARCTATION; AORTA STENOSIS; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRESSURE GRADIENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AORTA; AORTIC COARCTATION; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INFANT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; PRESSURE; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER;

EID: 0030454430     PISSN: 07351097     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(96)00395-6     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Campbell M. Natural history of coarctation of the aorta. Br Heart J 1970;32:633-40.
2. Rao PS, Gala LO, Smith PA, Wilson AD. Five- to nine-year follow-up results of balloon angioplasty of native aortic coarctation in infants and children. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27:462-70.
3. Rees S, Somervill J, Ward C, et al. Coarctation of the aorta: MR imaging in late postoperative assessment. Radiology 1989;173:499-502.
4. Boxer RA, LaCorte MA, Singh S, Cooper R, Goldman MM, Stein HL. Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging in evaluation follow-up of children treated for coarctation of the aorta. J Am Coll Cardiol 1986;7:1095-8.
5. Pucillo AL, Schechter AG, Kay RH, Herman MV. Magnetic resonance imaging of vascular conduits in coarctation of the aorta. Am Heart J 1989;117:482-5.
6. Parks WJ, Ngo TD, Plauth WH, et al. Incidence of aneurysm formation after Dacron patch aortoplasty repair for coarctation of the aorta: long-term results and assessment utilizing magnetic resonance angiography with three-dimensional surface rendering. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;26:266-71.
7. Nyman R, Hallberg M, Sunnegardh J, Thuren J, Henze A. Magnetic resonance imaging and angiography for the assessment of coarctation of the aorta. Acta Radiol 1989;30:481-5.
8. Simpson IA, Chung KJ, Glass RF, Sahn DJ, Sherman FS, Hesselink J. Cine magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of anatomy and flow relations in infants and children with coarctation of the aorta. Circulation 1988;78:142-8.
9. Marx GR, Allen HD. Accuracy and pitfalls of Doppler evaluation of the pressure gradient in aortic coarctation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1986;7:1379-85.
10. Rijsterborgh H, Roeland J. Doppler assessment of aortic stenosis: Bernoulli revisited. Ultrasound Med Biol 1987;13:241-8.
11. Yoganathan AP, Valdes-Cruz LM, Schmidt-Dohna J, et al. Continuous-wave Doppler velocities and gradients across fixed tunnel obstructions: studies in vitro and in vivo. Circulation 1987;76:657-66.
12. Levine RA, Jimoh A, Cape EG, McMillian S, Yoganathan AP, Weyman AE. Pressure recovery distal to a stenosis: potential cause of gradient overestimation by Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989;13:706-15.
13. Young DF, Tsai FY. Flow characteristics in models of arterial stenoses - I. steady flow. J Biomech 1973;6:395-410.
14. Muligan SA, Doyle M, Matsuda T, et al. Aortoiliac disease: two-dimensional inflow angiography with lipid suppression. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993;3:829-34.
15. Kent KC, Edelman RR, Kim D, Steinman TI, Porter DH, Skillman JJ. Magnetic resonance imaging: a reliable test for the evaluation of proximal renal arterial stenosis. J Vasc Surg 1991;13:311-8.
16. Anson JA, Heiserman JE, Drayer BP, Spetzler RF. Surgical decision on the basis of magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid arteries. Neurosurgery 1993;32:335-43.
17. Stern HC, Locher D, Wallnofer K, et al. Noninvasive assessment of coarctation of the aorta: comparative measurements by two-dimensional echocardiography, magnetic resonance, and angiography. Pediatr Cardiol 1991;12:1-5.
18. Sondergaard L, Hidebrandt P, Lindvig K, et al. Valve area and cardiac output in aortic stenosis: quantification by magnet resonance velocity mapping. Am Heart J 1993;127:1156-64.
19. Kilner PJ, Manzara CC, Mohiaddin RH, et al. Magnetic resonance jet velocity mapping in mitral and aortic valve stenosis. Circulation 1993;87:1239-48.
20. Moore JE, Ku DN, Glagov S, Zarin CK. Pulsatile flow visualization in the abdominal aorta: implications for increased susceptibility to atherosclerosis. J Biomech Eng 1992;114:391-7.
21. Fung YC. Biomechanics. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1988:63-5.
22. Guyton AC. Textbook of Medical Physiology. 8th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1991.
23. Weber G, Strauss AL, Rieger H, Scheffler A, Eisenhoffer J. Validation of Doppler measurement of pressure gradient across a peripheral model arterial stenosis. J Vasc Surg 1992;16:10-6.
24. Hattle L. Noninvasive assessment and differentiation of left ventricular outflow obstruction with Doppler ultrasound. Circulation 1981;64:381-7.
25. Faccenda F, Usui Y, Spencer MP. Doppler measurement of the pressure drop caused by arterial stenosis: an experimental study. Angiology 1985;36:899-905.
26. Cape EG, Yoganathan AP, Levine RA. A new theoretical model for noninvasive quantification of mitral regurgitation. J Biomech 1990;23:27-33.
27. Kosturakis D, Allen HD, Goldberg SJ, Sahn DJ, Valdez-Cruz LM. Noninvasive quantification of stenotic semilunar valve areas by Doppler echocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 1984;3:1256-62.
28. Yeager M, Yock PG, Popp RL. Comparison of Doppler derived pressure gradient to that determined at cardiac catheterization in adults with aortic stenosis: implications for management. Am J Cardiol 1986;57:644-8.
29. Currie PJ, Seward JB, Reeder GS, et al. Continuous-wave Doppler echocardiographic assessment of severity of calcific aortic stenosis: a simultaneous Doppler-catheter correlative study in 100 adult patients. Circulation 1985;71:1162-9.
30. Zhang Y, Ihlen H, Nitter-Hauge S. Estimation of peak-to-peak pressure gradient in aortic stenosis by Doppler echocardiography. Int J Cardiol 1986;10:197-212.
31. Berger M, Berdorf RL, Galterstein PE, Goldberg E. Evaluation of aortic stenosis by continuous wave Doppler ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 1984;3:150-6.
32. Stevenson JG, Kawabori I. Noninvasive determination of pressure gradients in children: two methods employing pulsed Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1984;3:179-92.
33. de Graaf RG, Groen JP. MR angiography with pulsatile flow. Magn Reson Imaging 1992;10:25-34.
34. van Dijk P. Direct cardiac NMR imaging of heart wall and blood flow velocity. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1984;8:429-36.
35. Firmin DN, Nayler GL, Kilner PJ, Longmore DB. The application of phase shifts in NMR for flow measurement. Magn Reson Med 1990;14:230-41.
36. Oshinski JN, Ku DN, Bohning DA, Pettigrew RI. The effect of acceleration on the accuracy of phase velocity mapping in accelerating flows. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1992;2:665-70.
37. Pettigrew RI, Daniels W, Galloway JR. Quantitative phase flow MR imaging in dogs by using standard sequences: comparison with in vivo flow meter measurements. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987;148:411-4.
38. Buonocore MH, Bogren H. Factors influencing the accuracy and precision of velocity-encoded phase imaging. Magn Reson Med 1992;26:141-54.
39. Ku DN, Klafta JM, Gewertz BL, Zarins CK. The contribution of valves to saphenous vein graft resistance. J Vasc Surg 1987;6:274-9.
40. Oshinski JN, Pettigrew RI, Ku DN. Turbulent fluctuation velocity: the most significant determinate in post-stenotic signal loss. Magn Reson Med 1995;33:193-9.