Theoretical prediction of side branch compromise after main branch stenting in coronary bifurcation

Journal of Geriatric Cardiology

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 91-100

  Vassilev, Dobrin ^a,c   Gil, Robert ^a,b  

^a Central Hospital of the Internal Affairs and Administration Ministry   (Poland)

^b POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (Poland)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ALEXANDROVSKA   (Bulgaria)

Author keywords

Angioplasty; Bifurcation lesion; Blood flow; Stent

Indexed keywords

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FLUOROSCOPY; HEART HEMODYNAMICS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; STENOSIS; STENT;

EID: 63049085836     PISSN: 16715411     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Iakovou I, Ge L, Colombo A. Contemporary stent treatment of coronary bifurcations. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46: 1146-1155
2. Louvard Y, Lefèvre T, Morice MC. Percutaneous coronary intervention for bifurcation coronary disease Heart 2004;90: 713-722
3. Steigen T, Maeng MM, Wiseth R, et al. Randomized study on simple versus complex stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions (The NORDIC Bifurcation Study). Circulation 2006; 114: 1955-1961.
4. Pan M, de Lezo JS, Medina A, et al. Rapamycin-eluting stents for the treatment of bifurcated coronary lesions: a randomized comparison of a simple versus complex strategy. Am Heart J. 2004; 148: 857-864
5. Colombo A, Moses J, Morice MC, et al. Randomized study to evaluate sirolimus-eluting stents implanted in coronary bifurcation lesions. Circulation 2004; 109: 1244-1249
6. Koo BK, Kang HJ, Youn TJ, et al. Physiologic assessment of jailed side branch lesions using fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46: 633-637
7. Nissen SE, Gurley JC, Grines CL, et al. Intravascular ultrasound assessment of lumen size and wall morphology in normal subjects and patients with coronary artery disease Circulation 1991; 84: 1087-1099
8. Gai LY. No Touch is as effective as stenting and ballooning in managing compromised side branch. Am J Cardiol 2005;96 (suppl 7A): 81H. (Pubitemid 41132689)
9. Kim YS, Kwak JJ, Sir JJ, et al. Serial changes in the functional significance of jailed side branch lesions after fractional flow reserve-guided side branch intervention strategy in bifurcating lesions. Am. J. Cardiol 2006; 97(suppl S2): 78D.
10. Lefèvre T, Morice MC, Sengottuvel G, et al. Influence of technical strategies on the outcome of coronary bifurcation stenting. EuroIntervention 2005; 1: 31-37
11. Legrand V, Thomas M, Zelizko M, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions: state-of-the-art. Insights from the second meeting of the European Bifurcation Club. EuroIntervention 2007; 9: 44-49
12. Kinoshita T, Kobayashi Y, Gregorio JD, et al. Difference in security of stent jail between Palmaz-Schatz, NIR, and multilink stents: The effect of balloon inflation through stent struts Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv 1999; 48: 230-234
13. Ormiston JA, Webster MWI, el Jack S, et al. Drug-eluting stents for coronary bifurcations: Bench testing of provisional sidebranch strategies Catheter. Cardiovasc Interv 2006; 67: 49-55.
14. Ormiston JA, Webster MWI, Ruygrok PN, et al. Stent deformation following simulated side-branch dilatation: A comparison of five stent designs Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv 1999; 47: 258-264
15. Louvard Y, Lefevre T. Bifurcation lesion stenting, in: A. Colombo, G. Stankovic, Problem oriented approaches in interventional cardiology. Informa Healthcare 2007.
16. Mintz GS, Nissen SE, Anderson WD, et al. American College of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Standards for Acquisition, Measurement and Reporting of Intravascular Ultrasound Studies (IVUS): a report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 1478-1492
17. Di Mario C, Gorge G, Peters R. Clinical application and image interpretation in intracoronary ultrasound. Study Group on Intracoronary Imaging of the Working Group of Coronary Circulation and of the Subgroup on Intravascular Ultrasound of the Working Group of Echocardiography of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 1998;19:207-229
18. Baim DS. Grossman's Cardiac Catheterization, Angiography, and Intervention. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 7 edition , 2005.
19. Silber S, Albertsson P, Avilés FF, et al. Guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions: The Task Force for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2005; 26: 804-847 (Pubitemid 40547082)
20. Prasad N, Seidelin PH. Side branch compromise during percutaneous coronary interventions. J Invas Cardiol. 2001; 13: 138-146
21. Seiler RL, Kirkeeide KL. Gould Measurement from arteriograms of regional myocardial bed size distal to any point in the coronary vascular tree for assessing anatomic area at risk. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 21: 783-797 (Pubitemid 23076298)
22. Zamir M. Distributing and delivering vessels of the human heart J Gen Physiol 1988; 91: 725-735
23. Vassilev D, Gil RJ, Rzezak J, et al. Quantitative analysis allows predicting side branch compromise after main branch stenting of bifurcation lesions Am J Cardiol 2007;100 (Suppl.1): S73,