An industrial case study of architecture conformance

ESEM'08: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 80-89

  Rosik, Jacek ^a   Le Gear, Andrew ^a   Babar, Muhammad Ali ^a   Buckley, Jim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIMERICK   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Design; Human factors; Verification

Indexed keywords

ARCHITECTURE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION; CONCURRENCY CONTROL; HUMAN ENGINEERING; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

HUMAN FACTORS; INDUSTRIAL CASE STUDIES; ORIGINAL DESIGNS; SOFTWARE DESIGNERS; SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT;

DESIGN;

EID: 62949096934     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1414004.1414019     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. What is domino application portlet? http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview. wss?uid=swg21162264, September 2007.
2. Eclipse, http://www.eclipse.org, Jan. 2008.
3. jrmtool eclipse plug-in. http://jrmtool.sourceforge.net/, 2008.
4. A. Christi, R. Koschke, and M. A. Storey. Equipping the reflexion method with automated clustering. WCRE, pages 89-98, 2005.
5. S. G. Eick, T. L. Graves, A. F. Karr, J. S. Marron, and A. Mockus. Does code decay? assessing the evidence from change management data. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., 27(1):1-12, 2001.
6. P. Frenzel, R. Koschke, A. Breu, and K. Angstmann. Extending the Reflexion Method for Consolidating Software Variants into Product Lines. Reverse Engineering, 2007. WCRE 2007. 14th Working Conference on, pages 160-169, 2007.
7. R. L. Glass. We have lost our way. J. Syst. Softw., 18(2):111-112, 1992.
8. A. E. Hassan and R. C. Holt. Using development history sticky notes to understand software architecture, iwpc, 00:183, 2004.
9. L. Hochstein and M. Lindvall. Diagnosing architectural degeneration, sew, 00:137, 2003.
10. J. Knodel, D. Muthig, and M. Naab. Understanding software architectures by visualization-an experiment with graphical elements. In WCRE '06: Proceedings of the 13th Working Conference on Reverse Engineering (WCRE 2006), pages 39-50, Washington, DC, USA, 2006. IEEE Computer Society.
11. J. Knodel, D. Muthig, M. Naab, and M. Lindvall. Static evaluation of software architectures. In CSMR '06: Proceedings of the Conference on Software Maintenance, and Reengineering, pages 279-294, Washington, DC, USA, 2006. IEEE Computer Society.
12. J. Knodel and D. Popescu. A comparison of static architecture compliance checking approaches, wicsa, 00:12, 2007.
13. R. Koschke and D. Simon. Hierarchical reflexion models. In WCRE '03: Proceedings of the 10th Working Conference on Reverse Engineering, page 36, Washington, DC, USA, 2003. IEEE Computer Society.
14. P. Kruchten. Architectural blueprints - the 4+1 view model of software architecture. IEEE Software, 12(6):42-50, 1995.
15. L. Layman, L. Williams, and R. S. Amant. Toward reducing fault fix time: Understanding developer behavior for the design of automated fault detection tools, esem, 0:176-185, 2007.
16. A. Le Gear. Component Reconn-exion. PhD thesis, University of Limerick, 2006.
17. A. Le Gear, J. Buckley, J. Collins, and K. O'Dea. Software Reconn-fiexion: Understanding Software Using a Variation on Software Reconnaissance and Reflexion Modelling. 2005.
18. G. C. Murphy and D. Notkin. Reengineering with reflexion models: A case study. Computer, 30(8):29-36, 1997.
19. G. C. Murphy, D. Notkin, and K. J. Sullivan. Software reflexion models: bridging the gap between source and high-level models. In SIGSOFT '95: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGSOFT symposium on Foundations of software engineering, pages 18-28, New York, NY, USA, 1995. ACM.
20. G. C. Murphy, D. Notkin, and K. J. Sullivan. Software reflexion models: Bridging the gap between design and implementation. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., 27(4):364-380, 2001.
21. M. P. O'Brien, J. Buckley, and C. Exton. Empirically studying software practitioners: Bridging the gap between theory and practice. In ICSM '05: Proceedings of the 21st IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM'05), pages 433-442, Washington, DC, USA, 2005. IEEE Computer Society.
22. D. Perry, A. Porter, and L. Votta. A primer on empirical studies. In Tutorial Presented at the International Conference on Software Maintenance, 1997.
23. M. Sefika, A. Sane, and R. H. Campbell. Monitoring compliance of a software system with its high-level design models. In ICSE '96: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on Software engineering, pages 387-396, Washington, DC, USA, 1996. IEEE Computer Society.
24. M. Shaw and P. C. Clements. The golden age of software architecture. IEEE Softw., 23(2):31-39, 2006.
25. T. Standish. Essay on software reuse. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 10(5):494-497, 1984.
26. J. B. Tran, M. W. Godfrey, E. H. S. Lee, and R. C. Holt. Architectural repair of open source software. Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Program Comprehension, page 48, Washington, DC, USA, 2000. IEEE Computer Society.
27. R. T. Tvedt, P. Costa, and M. Lindvall. Does the code match the design? a process for architecture evaluation. ICSM, 2002.
28. R. T. Tvedt, P. Costa, and M. Lindvall. Evaluating Software Architectures. Architectural Issues, 61:2-43, 2004.
29. R. K. Yin. Case Study Research: Design and Methods, volume 5 of Applied Social Research Methods Series. Sage Publications Inc, third edition edition, 2003.