Static evaluation of software architectures

Proceedings of the European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering, CSMR

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 279-288

  Knodel, Jens ^a   Lindvall, Mikael ^b   Muthig, Dirk ^a   Naab, Matthias ^a  

^a FRAUNHOFER IESE   (Germany)

^b Fraunhofer USA Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

ADORE; Architecture; Architecture evaluation; Product line; PuLSE DSSA; Reverse engineering

Indexed keywords

ARCHITECTURE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION; MAINTENANCE; QUALITY CONTROL; REENGINEERING;

BUSINESS GOALS; CASE STUDIES; EUROPEAN; EVOLUTION (CO); LIFE CYCLE (LC); PRACTICAL EXPERIENCE; QUALITY REQUIREMENTS; SOFTWARE SYSTEMS; STATIC ARCHITECTURE;

SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE;

EID: 34548764523     PISSN: 15345351     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CSMR.2006.53     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. B.Anders, J. Fellman, M. Lindvall, I. Rus: Experimenting with Software Architecture Flexibility Using an Implementation of the Tactical Separation Assisted Flight Environment, Proceedings of IEEE/NASA SEL Workshop, 2005.
2. Apache Tomcat http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/index.html
3. C. Atkinson et al.: Component-based Product Line Engineering with UML, Addison-Wesley, 2001
4. J. Bayer et al.: PuLSE: A Methodology to Develop Software Product Lines, 5th Symposium on Software Reusability (SSR'99), 1999
5. J. Bayer et al: Definition of Reference Architectures based on Existing Systems, (IESE-Report 034.04/E), 2004
6. J. Bayer: View-Based Software Documentation, PhD, Fraunhofer IRB Verlag, 2004.
7. J. Bosch: Design & Use of Software Architectures, Addison-Wesley, 2000
8. E. Chikofsky, and J. H. Cross: Reverse Engineering and Design Recovery: a Taxonomy, IEEE Software, 7(1): 13-17, January 1990
9. P. Clements, R. Kazman., and M. Klein: Evaluating Software Architectures: Methods and Case Studies, Addison-Wesley, 2002
10. P. Clements and L. M. Northrop: Software Product Lines: Practices and Patterns, Addison-Wesley, 2001
11. Eclipse Modeling Framework, http://www.eclipse.org/emf
12. Graphical Editing Framework, http://www.eclipse.org/gef/
13. C. Hofmeister, R. Nord, R., and D. Soni: Applied Software Architecture. Addison-Wesley, 1999
14. IEEE Standard 1471 - Recommended Practice for Architectural Descriptions of Software-Intensive Systems, IEEE Computer Society, 2000
15. J. Knodel: Reconstruction of Architectural Views by Design Hypothesis, Softwaretechnik-Trends, 2003
16. J. Knodel, T. Forster, J. F. Girard: Comparing design alternatives from field-tested systems to support product line architecture design, CSMR, March 2005
17. J. Knodel, D. Muthig: Analyzing Product Line Adequacy of Existing Components, Workshop on Reengineering towards Product Lines (R2PL), November 2005
18. R. Koschke: Atomic Architectural Component Recovery for Program Understanding and Evolution, PhD, University of Stuttgart, 2000.
19. R. Koschke, D. Simon: Hierarchical Reflexion Models, Working Conference on Reverse Engineering, 2003, pages 36-45.
20. P. Kruchten: The 4+1 View Model of Architecture. IEEE Software, November 1995 12(6):42-50.
21. D. Muthig and C. Atkinson: Model-driven Product Line Architectures. Software Product Line Conference (SPLC2), San Diego, CA, 2002
22. D. Muthig, et al.: GoPhone - A Software Product Line in the Mobile Phone Domain, Kaiserslautern, 2004 (IESE-Report 025.04/E)
23. P. Miodonski, T. Forster, J. Knodel, M. Lindvall, D. Muthig: Evaluation of Software Architectures with Eclipse, Kaiserslautern, 2004, (IESE-Report 107.04/E)
24. G. C. Murphy, D. Notkin, K. Sullivan: Software reflexion models: Bridging the gap between design and implementation. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 27(4), April 2001.
25. M. Naab, T. Forster, J. Knodel, D. Muthig: Evaluation of Graphical Elements and their Adequacy for the Visualization of Software Architectures, Kaiserslautern, 2005, (IESE-Report 078.05/E)
26. A. Postma: A method for module architecture verification and its application on a large component-based system, Information & Software Technology 45(4), 2003, 171-194
27. R. Tvedt, P. Costa, M. Lindvall: Evaluating Software Architectures, Advances in Computers, Elsevier Science, 2004
28. TSAFE: Tactical Separation Assisted Flight Environment, http://sdg.lcs.mit.edu/TSAFE/