A particle rearrangement index based on the kawakita powder compression equation

Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Volumn 98, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 1053-1063

  Nordstrom J ^a   Klevan, I ^b   Alderborn, G ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TROMSØ   (Norway)

Author keywords

Kawakita parameters; Particle rearrangement; Powder compression; Powder compression classification system; Rearrangement index

Indexed keywords

BICARBONATE; LACTOSE; SODIUM CHLORIDE; SUCROSE;

ARTICLE; COMPRESSION; KAWAKITA POWDER COMPRESSION EQUATION; MATHEMATICAL PARAMETERS; PARTICLE SIZE; POROSITY;

EID: 62849083625     PISSN: 00223549     EISSN: 15206017     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jps.21488     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Hardy IJ, Cook WG. 2003. Predictive and correlative techniques for design, optimisation and manufacture of solid dosage forms. J Pharm Pharmacol 55:3-18.
2. Roberts RJ, Rowe RC. 1987. The compaction of pharmaceutical and other model materials - A pragmatic approach. Chem Eng Sci 42:903-911.
3. Roberts RJ, Rowe RC, York P. 1995. The relationship between the fracture properties, tensile strength and critical stress intensity factor of organic solids and their molecular structure. Int J Pharm 125:157-162.
4. Rowe RC, Roberts RJ. 1996. Mechanical properties. In: Alderborn G, Nyström C, editors. Pharmaceutical powder compaction technology. New York: Marcel Dekker. pp 283-323.
5. Paronon P, Ilkka J. 1996. Porosity-pressure functions. In: Alderborn G, Nyström C, editors. Pharmaceutical powder compaction technology. New York: Marcel Dekker. pp 55-77.
6. Nicklasson F, Alderborn G. 2000. Analysis of the compression mechanics of pharmaceutical agglomerates of different porosity and composition using the Adams and Kawakita equations. Pharm Res 17:949-954.
7. Sonnergaard JM. 1999. A critical evaluation of the Heckel equation. Int J Pharm 193:63-71.
8. Duberg M, Nyström C. 1986. Studies on direct compression of tablets XVII. Porosity-pressure curves for the characterization of volume reduction mechanisms in powder compression. Powder Technol 46:67-75.
9. Sun C, Grant DJW. 2001. Influence of elastic deformation of particles on Heckel analysis. Pharm Dev Technol 6:193-200.
10. Heckel RW. 1961. Density-pressure relationships in powder compaction. Trans-Metall Soc AIME 221:671-675.
11. Walker EE. 1923. The properties of powders. Part VI. The compressibility of powders. Trans Faraday Soc 19:73-82.
12. Rois M. 2006. Developments in Powder Flow Testing. http:// wwwpharmtechcom/pharmtech/article/articledetailjsp?id=301457&pageid= 1&sk=&date=.
13. Hausner HH. 1967. Friction conditions in a mass of metal powder. Int J Powder Metall 3:7-13.
14. Carr RL. 1965. Evaluating flow properties of solids. Chem Eng 72:163-168.
15. Directorate for the Quality of Medicines of the Council of Europe. 2004. European Pharmacopoeia. editors. Strasboug: Directorate for the Quality of Medicines of the Council of Europe.
16. Board of Trustees. 2004. The United States Pharmacopoeia 27/The National Formulary 22. editors. Rockville: Board of Trustees.
17. Sørensen AH, Sonnergaard JM, Hovgaard L. 2005. Bulk characterization of pharmaceutical powders by low-pressure compression. Pharm Dev Technol 10:197.
18. Kawakita K, Ludde K-H. 1971. Some considerations on powder compression equations. Powder Technol 4:61-68.
19. Nordström J, Welch K, Frenning G, Alderborn G. 2008. On the physical interpretation of the Kawakita and Adams parameters derived from confined compression of granular solids. Powder Technol 182:424-435.
20. Adams MJ, McKeown R. 1996. Micromechanical analyses of the pressure-volume relationship for powders under confined uniaxial compression. Powder Technol 88:155-163.
21. Yap SF, Adams MJ, Seville JPK, Zhang Z. 2008. Single and bulk compression of pharmaceutical excipients: Evaluation of mechanical properties. Powder Technol 185:1-10.
22. Chang CS, Misra A, Sundaram SS. 1990. Micromechanical modeling of cemented sands under low amplitude oscillations. Geotechnique 40:251-263.
23. Kaye BH. 1967. Permeability techniques for characterizing fine powders. Powder Technol 1:11-22.
24. Nicklasson F, Alderborn G. 2001. Compression shear strength and tableting behavior of microcrystalline cellulose agglomerates modulated by a solution binder (polyethylene glycol). Pharm Res 18:873-877.
25. Alderborn G, Duberg M, Nystrom C. 1985. Studies on direct compression of tablets X. Measurement of tablet surface area by permeametry. Powder Technol 41:49-56.
26. Alderborn G, Nyström C. 1982. Studies on Direct Compression of Tablets III. The effect in tablet strength of changes in particle shape and texture obtained by milling. Acta Pharm Suec 19:147-156.
27. Sonnergaard JM. 2000. Impact of particle density and initial volume on mathematical compression models. Eur J Pharm Sci 11:307-315.
28. Trentadue F. 2001. A micromechanical model for a non-linear elastic granular material based on local equilibrium conditions. Int J Solids Struct 38:7319-7342.
29. Debbas S, Rumpf H. 1966. On the randomness of beds packed with spheres or irregular shaped particles. Chem Eng Sci 21:583-608.
30. European Pharmacopoeia Supplement, 2006, 508 2.9.36:3363-3366.
31. Eriksson M, Alderborn G. 1995. The effect of original particle size and tablet porosity on the increase in tensile strength during storage of sodium chloride tablets in a dry atmosphere. Int J Pharm 113:199-207.
32. Roberts RJ, Rowe RC. 1987. Brittle/ductile behaviour in pharmaceutical materials used in tabletting. Int J Pharm 36:205-209.
33. Alderborn G, Nyström C. 1985. Studies on direct compression of tablets XIV. The effect of powder fineness on the relation between tablet permeametry surface area and compaction pressure. Powder Technol 44:37-42.
34. Nordström J, Welch K, Frenning G, Alderborn G. 2007. On the role of granule yield strength for the tableting forming ability of granular solids. J Pharm Sci. 10.1002/jps.21351.